1394559
story
FortKnox writes:
"The two Jovians on the planet Jupiter have been 'arguing' for a while, and are about to collide. The article is descriptive and explains what happened the last time something like this happened, plus pictures. Time to get out your telescopes..."
What On Earth? (Score:1)
Re:What On Earth? (Score:2, Interesting)
Jovians are similar to hurricanes, but aren't the same. Not to mention that the 'smaller' Jovian is about the size of the earth, and its colliding with an ENORMOUS one (A *lot* bigger than it).
This has happened before on Jupitor (read the article), but I dunno about earth...
I guess the closest thing to this on earth would be that 'the perfect storm' movie. Isn't that about large storms colliding (and based on a true story)?
game of life (Score:3, Insightful)
This post is mean spirited and might be considered a flame. But if the sientific community has nothing but fawning press, how is sience to advance? Breathy exclamations about perpetual motion energy sources and cloned human kidneys are not good science. They are modern day snake oil salesmen taking reaserch dollars away from real science.
If the conventional press will not place a critical eye on psuedo science, perhaps we should. Perhaps we are the only ones who can.
Re:game of life (Score:3, Insightful)
What's even weirder for me is that I don't see his "lack of objectivity." He made a prediction. No, he didn't give odds. You'd need hundreds of simulations to lay odds. I don't know that anyone has those simulations in place right now, let alone an observer. So he made a reasonable prediction based on physics (bigger storm should well be expected to swollow the smaller one, at least at first examination) and previous observations. That's fine science reporting by me.
Trying to tout Chaos theory as the be-all and end-all and claiming that no one should be allowed to make predictions about things because Choas theory exists is some of the worst sophistry. Chaos theory has its uses, but don't think it negates all other ways of looking at the universe.
Re:game of life (Score:2)
From the next story (conveniently posted after your silly retort)
College Park, MD (January 30, 2002) Predicting the size, location, and timing of natural hazards is virtually impossible, but now, earth scientists are able to forecast hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, and landslides using fractals.
Re:game of life (Score:2)
Earth models don't cut it for predicting Jovian storms.
Area Resident, "I'm Riding It Out" (Score:2, Funny)
I hate imprecise science reporting... (Score:3, Interesting)
So... in an attempt to translate the above quoted statement into something with a hint of precision, I'm going to guess that the Jovian storms are probably anticyclonic (high pressure systems, unlike terrestrial hurricanes), which would reverse the rotational direction of the storm.
Re:I hate imprecise science reporting... (Score:2)
Re:I hate imprecise science reporting... (Score:1)
As for the Jovian storms, I'm not aware of the dynamics involved. Not my specialty... but it definitely sounds QUITE interesting.
-Jellisky
Re:I hate imprecise science reporting... (Score:2)
Yes, but... (Score:1)
It's all a matter of reference frames. On Earth, it's common to use sea level or the surface as a reference state. But on Jupiter, what do you call the "surface"? So, that's why I expressed a bit of caution in calling the Jovian storms high or low pressure systems since no one has defined the reference state.
That brings me to a further point, in that the vertical structure of a vortex is also important, especially when you you can only "see" part of it. Just because a vortex is spinning one way where you can see it doesn't imply that it's spinning that way throughout its vertical structure. So, like I said, I'm not an expert in the Jovian systems (even though I'm nearly a Terran vortex expert... at least as much as one who studies them for his job can be, at least), so I can make no claims about their vertical structures or what kind of circulations occur in them.
Hopefully that clarifies my point.
-Jellisky
planetary stupidity (Score:1)
Have you any idea what a Jovian is? Let me enlighten you: it is a planet (in particular a gas giant!) not some violent weather system. Please get your facts straight.