Black Hole Spewing Energy 16
dragoness.ai points to this story at space.com about some exciting news for black hole enthusiasts, writing "The scientists had a chance for the first time in history to observe energy coming out of a black hole."
Hawking (Score:1)
Except for Hawking radiation [colorado.edu] of course.
Re:Hawking (Score:3, Informative)
Comparing Hawking radiation and this new magnetically induced energy transfer (if it exsists) is like comparing a candle light to the sun, Both create light but with different effect.
Having discovered this method of energy transfer in the space close to a black hole might also be the key to explaining the huge energy jets observed from the centers of some galaxies (This is also mentioned in the original NASA article).
Yours Yazeran
Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.
Re:Hawking (Score:3, Insightful)
Except for Hawking radiation
Actually, no. The quote was: "Never before have we seen energy extracted from a black hole". Since we have never seen the Hawking radiation emitted by any known black hole, this statement is true (we've also never seen energy extraction occur by the Penrose process); the Hawking temperature of any black hole currently observable would be lower than the cosmic background radiation temperature, and certainly orders of magnitude below the black hole's local thermal environment, that we would never have a prayer to observe the HR.
Advanced civilizations (Score:2)
Re:Advanced civilizations (Score:1)
Re:Advanced civilizations (Score:1)
Re:Advanced civilizations (Score:2)
But I thought that the real way an advanced civilization would use black holes to produce energy involved putting a matter stream into the "ergosphere," to transfer some of its rotational energy to the matter stream.
The title reminds me of Red Dwarf........ (Score:1)
Holly: What?
Re:The title reminds me of Red Dwarf........ (Score:1)
RIMMER: (All in one breath) White hole. Spewing time. Engines dead. Air supply low. Advise please.
HOLLY: Excuse me?
RIMMER: (Again, as though attempting a world record on the most words spoken in one breath) White hole. Spewing time. Engines dead.--
HOLLY: I can't understand a word you're saying.
RIMMER: White.
HOLLY: Yes.
RIMMER: Hole.
HOLLY: Right.
RIMMER: Spewing.
HOLLY: Yes.
RIMMER: Time.
HOLLY: With you.
RIMMER: Engines dead.
HOLLY: Oh.
RIMMER: Air supply low.
HOLLY: Ah.
RIMMER: Advise please.
HOLLY: Right
original NASA press release (Score:4, Informative)
Re:original NASA press release (Score:1)
There should have been some visual red-shift observed at the two sides of the accretion disk.
Having said that, the video does look cool..
Yours Yazeran
Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.
Boys from the dwarf (Score:1)
OK, what's the coupling mechanism? (Score:2)
My dilettante's knowledge of black holes says nothing comes out except some radiation whose name I forget, but which is generated by the simple expedient of having a pair of virtual particles generated near the event horizon, and one falls in while the other doesn't. Since the two can't then recombine to disappear, we get a spontaneously-generated random particle.
(This is why one commentator maintains that causality fails near the event horizon. You could just as well get a desk [or a sperm whale] show up as some alpha particles. Of course, this is very roughly of the same probability as all the air molecules in your cube all moving to the left half for a second, leaving you in a vacuum. I wouldn't worry about it myself.)
Anyway, since photons don't get out of a black hole, how is the alleged magnetism applied from within the dingus? Do space-time geodesics extend across the event horizon? (You know, all those neat graph lines in the diagrams showing how gravity warps space.) Does the spinning hole then drag them around, making it all work?
I'd appreciate it if Carl Sagan's successor would speak up on this subject; thanks.
Re:OK, what's the coupling mechanism? (Score:1)
The material around a black hole in the accretion disk, however, can have a magnetic field. In fact, odds are pretty good that it will.
Re:OK, what's the coupling mechanism? (Score:1)
And I don't think I've had my room become a vacuum for a second. But I'm glad that our bodies can withstand vacuum for much longer than that.