Blow Stuff Up, Indoors 18
marmaluke writes: "Check out this story at Techtv.com. They built an explosion containment facility at Lawrence Livermore Lab that can take a punch and won't wake up the neighbors. They are going to use it for 'assessing the performance of the non-nuclear, or "primary," component in stockpiled nuclear weapons.' I just think it would be cool to have a little room to blow stuff up in! Anyone got any old PCs that you just don't know what to do with?" Also sounds like a good Dr. No / Dr. Evil unseen-extermination chamber.
It seems pretty cool, but... (Score:3, Interesting)
"Never freighten a little man, he'll kill you" -Lazarus Long
Hmmm... (Score:1)
hrm (Score:3, Funny)
I know. I'm sorry.
Re:hrm (Score:1)
Hmph. In my house it's the bedroom. *rimshot* ;)
Re:hrm (Score:1)
Please have a doctor examine your ears and your nose. We feel that something is seriously wrong with them.
Sincerely,
Your Neighbors
Why? (Score:2)
Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to rent one of those cheap hunter's-hotels out in the middle of nowhere next to some federal lands, truck out the hardware and send the researchers on a field trip every so often?
Heck, there's always the Nevada deserts where the original testing took place above-ground and the later stuff below. It's already got facilities and there's not a lot of call for the area these days.
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Re:Why? (Score:1)
That enough reasons for you?
Re:Why? (Score:2)
As to onsite, I don't want to be around the day something breaks loose. In desert there's no big need for a containment building and no big huhu if one were to fail.
Finally - for those worried about dsert ecology putting a small crater here & there isn't gonna hurt much outside the very local area (explosives in the open don't do all that much damage unless they're specialized for such.) We put holes in the desert every day in places like 29 Palms training artillery, this isn't much different. Heck the roads to/from the sites likely have more significent effect.
Actually... (Score:1, Informative)
The Lawerence Livermore Activity Center (Score:2)
The nuclear establishment is dying off. There are few, if any, young bomb designers. This is seen as a problem. And with all the restrictions on testing, it's really tough to design a new thermonuclear weapon and be sure it will work.
So there's a major effort underway to build cool stuff for wannabe bombmakers to play with. This is one of the cheaper items. The National Ignition Facility (a big laser) and the supercomputers for DoE labs are much more expensive.
linux not secure enough? (and NT is???) (Score:1)
Getting paid to break things (Score:2)
One of my college friends got a job with Detroit Edison [detroitedison.com]when he graduated, and he started out in their destructive testing lab. Basically, his job was to find out what happens to certain materials (like a 2" x 2" x 6 ft long hunk of iron) if exposed to thousands of volts at hundreds of amps.
Some things just vaporized, others would explode, and a few were able to carry the current.
We were always trying to talk him into setting up a tour for us, so we could watch him blow stuff up, but he was never able to... Damn.
Another friend was hired by Ford to do crash testing. We did manage to visit her, and see the test sled, and some of the crashed vehicles, but she couldn't set up a crash for us to watch either. Double Damn.
Oh well - at least I got to hear good stories about it.
In my job, they get mad at me if I blow things up.
Re:Getting paid to break things (Score:3, Funny)
A friend of mine works at a nearby arsenal, and every so often has to blow things up under the guise of getting rid of old stockpiles. They've actually got a few rooms like the one described in the article set up. Plenty of ordinances from the fifties or so that are past their expiration date get shoved into such a room, set off, and cleaned up.
While my friend finds his job tedious, it is a great job to impress his nephews. "Uncle Chris blows crap up all day at work!"
More info (Score:4, Informative)
Interesting that they've gone for a cheaper, more conventional construction. They used conventional reinforced concrete and a rectangular building, over the more blast-efficient spherical shape using layered concrete. They are using mild steel over armour plate to halve the cost, yet maintain 85% penetration resistance.
Also, the "of the various blast attenuation systems studied, the least expensive one, a rubber doormat-type material, proved to be the only acceptable option."
Now, do they accept on-line ordering?
just use the western US like they used to (Score:1)
I suppose this is almost a necessity when the blast would be releasing dangerous chemicals.