New model predicts explosive volcano in western US 17
Paintthemoon writes "A new study out of the UW-Madison of zircon & quartz crystals indicates that the Yellowstone 'hot spot' could erupt again in the near geologic future, with catastrophic results. Seems we're due for another round of volcanic activity which would be about a thousand times more powerful than Mt. Saint Helens. This is based on a new model of how the hot spot there recycles previously expelled molten rock, and gives new understanding of the mechanism involved.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/07/01072 3101806.htm"
Supervolcanoes (Score:3)
The documentary states that the last supervolcanic eruption, similar to what is predicted for Yellowstone, happened some 70,000 years ago. The sound was heard all the way around the world and is said to be the loudest sound ever heard by man. It also went on to say that the eruption's ash fall out and subsequent global climate changes nearly brought about the extiction of mankind.
This further supported the theory that the human genome was significantly reduced or concentrated at about this time in history. This concentration of the genome is attributed to the fact that since the supervolcanoe killed off so much of the human race, there was very little genetic diversity left to perpetuate the species. This resulted in us all having strikingly similar DNA even after tens of thousands of years of evolution.
Re:Barbequed squirrel (Score:2)
It's the same way with earthquakes, really. Sometimes people wonder aloud what possessed people to live in places with frequent earthquakes and/or volcanoes, and the answer is that the geological activity - or, rather the result of that activity - is the very reason it's a good place to live. You get a varied seafloor with lots of marine life, natural deep harbours, very fertile volcanic soil and varied terrain where it's easy to find secluded, protected sites on which to build.
/Janne
Re:Yogi (Score:2)
What abouot us metric idiots? (Score:2)
Re:Barbequed squirrel (Score:2)
The broader /. community is worrying [slashdot.org]about Hemos. Putting him on the back page is kind of like not inviting people over to the house because Grandpa's fighting the Nazis again.
or, alternatively, we had all kind of assumed that something big would happen in the next one hundred thousand, possibly one million, years, and thus this story is really only of interest to geologists and those who pretend to be able to fake it.
Re:Barbequed squirrel (Score:1)
They have evidece to show that there might be another good lightshow comming to Yellowstone
Another good lightshow!?!?! I think you're underestimating the magnitude a tad... When this thing goes, you won't have to worry about global warming for about 100 years, possibly longer. If you live in the US, or Canada, you'll have to worry about food though, because it will cover much of the north american breadbasket with a foot of ash.
Temkin (B.S. Geology)
Re:Supervolcanoes (Score:1)
And still the tourists come into Auckland, drive around for a few days, and ask
"So where's this volcano?"
Ruapehu's very pretty and all, but hardly counts compared to Taupo.
TomV
[Off topic] Articles like this (Score:1)
Re:[Off topic] Articles like this (Score:1)
Disaster Movies (Score:1)
Re:That's all good... (Score:3)
For info on local quake risk: enter your zipcode [usgs.gov].
OK,
- B
--
Oh how I lament. (Score:1)
The article really didn't offer anything new. It looks as if the confirmed some of the timescale through a seperate method. I think I may well have read about it, but I'm quite sure I saw a little hour program about this in the discovery channel. Here's what google has to say. [google.com] The program I saw may well have been this [bbc.co.uk] BBC documentary. I'm sure I saw this mid, or early 2000, and the linked slashdot article seems to add next to nothing. The beauty of this is, although the destruction would be on a scale not recorded, an ensuing ice age would certainly do a lot to assuage worries of global warming.
Now it seems I almost exclusivly watch the History channel, Discovery, PBS, and some Bravo, if at all. In my youth, it seemed like there were always three things to watch at the same time on the 5 channels we had. (Now I rarely find anything on 60.) So I lament the decline of television. When the internet came to me, I didn't lament the decline of TV so much. Then everyone got online, and so I lament the internet's decline. Now it seems I'm so jadded, I lament that I've nothing left to lament.
Re:Barbequed squirrel (Score:3)
Actually, I kind of see it as a blessing that these really good stories get stuck in the back. It keeps all of the standard idiots from reading them, and worse yet posting worthless junk that clogs up a good story. Keep them off of the main page, and we can actually have a good descusion about them, without all of the "heh heh, he said explode" comments. Sure the threshold thing is great, but it still leaves way to many dumb posts who get moded up from other idiots.
That being said, This artice seemed real light on details. They have evidece to show that there might be another good lightshow comming to Yellowstone, but the article seems a bit short on numbers and graphs. Though its nice to see that there is some work being done in the area of predicting volcainic eruptions.
Even still, if this is supportable research, I've got to wonder how the environmentalist movement is going to spin this one into being the fault of humans?
Barbequed squirrel (Score:1)
Re:Barbequed squirrel (Score:1)
Re:Barbequed squirrel (Score:1)
I agree strongly on this point, however, this article lacks anything of broad interest as far as I can tell. I had hoped that this was some sort of imminent disaster, in a timescale we could be conecerned about. My initial expectation was a government attept at releasing the pressure using high explosives, that would be of interest to all of us.
Yogi (Score:1)