Pillars Underwater 149
iammichael writes "Scientists scouring the Atlantic Ocean have found huge towers of stone (the tallest ever) that they've named the "The Lost City" since they are located on a seafloor mountain named Atlantis Massif. Read about it on Yahoo news or CNN"
Later that afternoon, (Score:1)
Re:Um... (Score:1)
Altan.
I mean it's not to far of a jump from Aztlan to Atlantis and Altan....
Re:Found it (Score:1)
Phil's underwear?!? (Score:2)
Geesh.
AYBABTU (Score:5)
Intercept: 1123984 Channel: 59876
Subject: DP Base Control
Date: 01:00:32 7/11/2001 UTC
Summary: This is is an intercept from DP Base to control indicting the discovery of base 68 and imminent discovery of base 69. Partial decoded transcript follows. It is recommended that action be taken ASAP to prevent the movement from 69 to 70.
To Home Base
From Deep Piller 69
They are found our base 68. We must move our to base 70 or we will be overrun by newcomers. Deep portions of base 68 under attack by bright lights and something calling itself nnc or cnn. Server under attack by something called dot slash or slash dot or dot slash dot. Recommend move to 70 when feasible.
Re:Um... (Score:5)
Interestingly, Irish legend places one of the parent races of the Irish people, coming from the west, with advanced technology (for the time - including a prosthetic hand???) - though it must be pointed out that anyone coming by sea from africa or the mediterranean will also finally approach Ireland from the south-west. But Irish legend places the kingdom of the immortals, Tir na nOg, to the west, across the ocean. In fact, every sea-going european race extant at or a bit before plato's time talks about land to the far west of europe....
Re:Anime Rip Off (Score:1)
Re:Whoa. Revelation! (Score:1)
Whoa. Revelation! (Score:5)
Right above NT Administrators, yet only a couple rungs below
Disney (Score:1)
No... (Score:2)
It should be "The Previously Lost, But Recently Found City."
Re:Aztlan? (Score:1)
DISCLAIMER: English is not my first language, if you want to correct my grammar or orthography, you are welcome.
Re:Um... (Score:1)
--
Re:Fairly meaningless (Score:1)
--
What anthropologists say when they don't know (Score:2)
Judging by the way most anthropologists and archaeologists classify anything they can't understand as "Religious Significance", I'd say you have a very fine grasp of the subject.
In a few thousand years' time, I expect most of the freebie merchandise handed out at computer exhibitions will be classified as being of "Religious Significance". All hail the mighty Dust Puppy and praise to the Novelty Mobile Phone Holder.
One wonders what anthropologists and archaeologists would make of an entirely agnostic or aetheist society. Speaking as an agnostic myself, I really irks me that long after my death, people will be slapping "Religious Significance" labels over my property.
--
Ai! Cthulhu F'Tagn! (Score:2)
These could be the power pillars (Score:2)
Basically, the source of electrical power for the people of Atlantis was a ruby-like gem housed in a tower that emitted some laser-like beam of energy. This energy was the source of all of the Atlantian technology.
While this gem was the source of all of their power, it was also the reason for their eventual destruction due to some kind of over use or abuse.
Regardless, this is not a fantasy that I've made up, this is actually what Edgar Cayce had told in one of his many readings on Atlantis. I don't have a URL for more information, but there are books on Edgar Cayce and his readings on Atlantis if you're interested. You may also want to check out the book "The Sleeping Prophet". This man was no joke (b. late 1800's, d. 1942?)
--
Oh great ... (Score:3)
Karma karma karma karma karmeleon: it comes and goes, it comes and goes.
Aztlan? (Score:2)
And if you mean Tenochtitlan, a city built on a lake, with canals and all that, it was built when the Aztecs arrived to the lake, somewhen in the XII or XIII century. Well after Plato.
__
National Geographic has signed on, video coming (Score:1)
Very hard, compared to the side-scan sonar unit which is merely towed behind a surface ship. To get video from 800 meters down requires expensive submersibles, either robotic or manned.
Fortunately the National Geographic Society is sponsoring another expedition. We should have some answers soon.
Some FAR more interesting underwater structures... (Score:5)
And they're not merely a 2200-year-old city in shallow water like the one recently-discovered off the coast of Egypt -- these structures are 800 meters deep, and must be far older.
If this discovery is verified, it'll be huge.
Read about it on a mainstream site [google.com] (MSNBC -- quick, grab it before it disappears from Google's cache!)
or get more detail from this fringe site [earthfiles.com].
Re:Um... (Score:1)
He didn't prove it happened, he proved the journey was possible. But yes, it was impressive. There's also information at http://www.timseverin.net [timseverin.net]
He also sailed the Pacific "on a bamboo raft to test the theory that Asian sailors reached America some 2,000 years ago."
--
Re:Fairly meaningless (Score:2)
Re:Some FAR more interesting underwater structures (Score:2)
Huge? No it will be buried and forgotten like all the other evidence of an advanced prehistoric civilization. The so-called "scientists" that make up archaeology's status quo really don't want to rewrite their textbooks...
Re:Some FAR more interesting underwater structures (Score:2)
Give any engineer a tour of the great pyramids and show him the gigantic interior granite slabs fitted together with incredible precision and ask him if he could duplicate it with today's technology given an unlimited budget.
Or take him to Macchu Pichu and ask him the same question.
Black Smokers come on shore sometimes... (Score:2)
You've probably seen the videos of black smokers giving off what looks like soot on the ocean floor. Well, sometimes they get carried across the ocean floor with the plate, but instead of getting carried into the subduction zone, they get scraped off onto shore. You can find the remains of one if these in the back country of Santa Barbara, CA.
Re:Um... (Score:2)
I think Crete and Santorini are a considerably better bet if you're looking for the origins of the Atlantis myth.
They're closer to where the myth grew up, they had a flourishing civilisation at the right time and it probably was wiped out by natural disaster (volcanic explosion on Santorini, leading to a tidal wave hitting Crete). You can visit these places and look at rather ancient ruins, and wonder if these are the places which inspired the story.
Putting the Spanish arrival in America "at least a millenium" later is an underestimate, two to three millenia might be a bit closer.
Re:In other news. (Score:1)
Ah, you're pining for the fnords!
Re:Misinformation Capitalizing on the Atlantis Mov (Score:2)
You were disappointed?
Imagine thier disappointment when they realized that NOBODY saw the Atlantis movie!
Re:Later that afternoon, (Score:1)
s/Anaheim/Burback/
domc
Re:Eh? (Score:1)
Re:Misinformation Capitalizing on the Atlantis Mov (Score:1)
Re:Whoa. Revelation! (Score:1)
--
NOT man made (Score:2)
-m
Re:Um... (Score:3)
Re:That was news (Score:1)
Re:Coast to Coast AM (Score:1)
As much as I'd like to believe it... (Score:2)
--
well.. (Score:2)
--
Re:Fairly meaningless (Score:1)
Well, of course it was to the west. (Score:5)
...because they knew from first-hand experience that going to the land to the east meant you got killed by migrating Mongols, going to the lands in the south meant you got killed by expanding Greeks, Romans, Persians, or Africans, and going to the lands in the north meant you froze to death or drowned. "Hey, there's nothing to the west that we can see; it's gotta be better than what we know right now, let's invent legends about it."
Okay, so I would've made a lousy anthropologist. :-)
Re:Misinformation Capitalizing on the Atlantis Mov (Score:1)
Eh? (Score:2)
Speaking of that movie, am I the only one that gets irritated by the McDonald's commercial? "I speak Atlantian".. Not after I hit her in the face with a brick. ;)
Re:Tir na nOg (Score:1)
Re:As much as I'd like to believe it... (Score:1)
Those aren't lost towers (Score:3)
Jimmy Hoffa is buried in dem things der tuff guy
Re: Nature embargoes news until article appears (Score:1)
http://www.nature.com/nature/submit/gta/index.h
"5.1 Prepublicity. Once submitted, contributions must not be discussed with the media (including other scientific journals) until the publication date; advertising the contents of any contribution to the media may lead to rejection. The only exception is in the week before publication, during which contributions may be discussed with the media if it is clearly indicated that their contents should under no circumstances be publicised until Nature's press embargo has elapsed (1900 h local London time on the day before the publication date)."
This is typical of many major scientific journals. (E.g., medical journals) In this day of the Web, the relevance of these kinds of embargoes is debatable, but there are important reasons for them. Mainly, Nature wants to ensure that its contents are properly peer-reviewed before being released. If everyone discusses non-reviewed results in the open media before the review process can be finished, the research will tend to run ahead of the reviewers. In my experience, this is a major problem with the rising of "pre-print" servers, which show results before peer review. As far as I can tell, the results are something like doing scientific research on Slashdot. The results rarely end up being properly peer reviewed, and when they do, nobody reads the journal articles, because they've "already seen" the results on the pre-print servers, regardless of what changes had to be made to satisfy the reviewers.
A minor reason not to discuss things until the article appears is if Nature rejects the article.
Anyhow, the news media have probably talked to these scientists for the past week, to get the story as straight as they can before their own deadline. Of course, since the mainstream media (and, perhaps as importantly, their editors) aren't generally well-trained in science, they often garble things, and often will play up unrealistic future visions to impress readers. Just like slashdot.
It figures (Score:2)
What else is new?
Re:Eh? (Score:1)
found huge towers of stone (Score:1)
Sonofa! Thats were I left those things.
I really gotta stop drinking those salt water martinis
Re:Fairly meaningless (Score:1)
Coast to Coast AM (Score:1)
Re:Art Bell is a racist who hates Filipinos (Score:1)
7 months after the fact!!! (Score:1)
Re:7 months after the fact!!!-Sorry, better link (Score:1)
Re:Um... (Score:1)
I don't know that conventional wisdom kept things quiet, but the Phoenecians certainly did. This was a middle-eastern race, who had probably the most advanced navigational capapbilities of their time. I seem to recall that there is evidence which suggests that they were not only going to the Americas, but that they were getting as far away as New Zealand.
Apparently they were very secretive and would rather scuttle a ship than let someone following find out where they were going. It doesn't surprise me that none of their knowledge got passed on to us.
-- Steve
Re:Underground geysers? (Score:1)
Re:Tabloid Slashdot? (Score:2)
In other news. (Score:1)
fnord!
--Adequacy.org, Slashdot without the crap. [adequacy.org]
Movie marketing (Score:1)
What was the last movie to use hydrothermal vents as a tie-in ?
-- Dennis Hopper's "Black Smokers" in Waterworld.
So that was a success then.
Olivine (Score:1)
Minor quibble: olivine is a mineral rather than a rock. But also, isn't most of the mantle of the earth made of olivine?
It's not as common in the crust as quartz, but in terms of volume I would guess there's more olivine in the earth than anything else.
Of course, I'm not a Geologist or anything...
Re:OT: Rock? (Score:1)
But here goes:
Anime Rip Off (Score:4)
Geez, how many times is this story going to be posted?
Re:Some FAR more interesting underwater structures (Score:2)
Re:Um... (Score:1)
Regardless if a few Egyptians found their way onto shore, say, in Ft. Lauderdale, or Vikings in Newfoundland, they didn't hang around very long, and had no cultural impact, so it's like they were never here anyway. Maybe enough to make you go "hmph. Well I'll be damned" like you would if you found a puppy under your wheelbarrow after a flood. You certainly won't be telling the puppy story 30 generations from now.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
Re:Cthulu (Score:2)
Cthulu (Score:4)
Re:Um... (Score:2)
Re:Atlanta (Score:1)
Skeptic (Score:1)
The part I liked the most was the summary of the Internet's views on Atlantis... about the blue-blooded mermaids and so on.
Re:Eh? (Score:1)
note (Score:2)
the phrase "lost city" seems more interesting than this oceanographic discovery of the decade.
Re:Um... (Score:1)
More info about Archaea (Score:3)
The archaea (or archaebacteria) are an interesting group of organism. They look like bacteria, but are more closely related to plants and animals than to bacteria, even though they have the circular DNA of bacteria rather than the straight DNA of animals/plants. The can also survive in a remarkable range of hostile environments. Two interesting pages on them are:
Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose that you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.
Re:Tabloid Slashdot? (Score:1)
Re:Atlanta (Score:2)
Bender: "In case of emergency, my ass can be used as a flotation device."
---------
Milhouse: "Why don't we put it on the internet?"
Re:Misinformation Capitalizing on the Atlantis Mov (Score:2)
For all you Lovecraft fans... (Score:2)
Re:Cthulu (Score:2)
Re:come on (Score:3)
everyone should know this is just another disney promotion.
Well, of course it is. It was one of the top 3 stories [go.com] on ABCNews.com [abcnews.com] today. And, as many people know, ABCNews is owned by the Disney corporation.
Tabloid Slashdot? (Score:5)
Re:Um... (Score:5)
come on (Score:2)
watch, in a week, disney [maquilasolidarity.org] will come out with some new toys for McDonalds [disinfo.com] toys.
Re:Um... (Score:2)
It's small wonder why legends about superior people from the west of the Atlantic are so prevalent in European mythology.
Re:In other news. (Score:2)
Sensationalizism...Bad Yahoo? Bad! (Score:2)
Read CNN's review of the information (which has a pic BTW) for a better understanding of what the discovery is really about (hydrothermal vent communities...Specifically..A whole new type!!)
Yahoo?, Why didn't you just stick to search engines??
That was news (Score:2)
Nice of Yahoo and CNN to finally pick it up.
http://www.floridafossilhunters.com/newsletter/ March2001/marNews2001.htm
web and shell hosting plus more
Re:What anthropologists say when they don't know (Score:5)
Also understand that pop culture can sometimes reinforce things like "religious significance" as an explanation. For example, witness the number of people running around these days with the hazy idea that in early human history, we all worshipped some universal "mother goddess" across all cultures -- very politically correct, and very popular... Seems to give people, especially women, a real warm fuzzy. The evidence people have heard/seen? So-called "fertility figurines" from any number of cultures as seen [of course] on TV documentaries. And of course, it's all nonsense.
This view is certainly not the accepted one within the academic community, for the most part, and certainly not in the universal sense. For all we know, these figurines are the Barbie Dolls of ancient children in one culture and wig-holders in another. But you won't sell product if you spend an hour saying "we don't know" on television.
What I'm getting at is that when you say "judging by the way most anthropologists and archaeologists classify..." it appears that you're mostly looking at the wrong anthropologists and archaeologists. Read the Anthropology journals instead -- the cable channels are in it for the ratings.
Underground geysers? (Score:3)
Actually, it's probably been happening for hundreds of thousands of years....
The pictures are kind of neat though, and it's alway interesting to see what kinds of new life have turned up here on earth. (they mentioned they had reccently found some one-celled organisms living near the vents) It's hard to imagine sometimes, that even with all the technology like satellite imaging looking down on the earth, there are still places that are mysteries.
Looking at the description, they sound kinda like underwater hotsprings or geysers (like the ones out in Yellowstone) and they build a kind of dome or tower because of a build up of the minerals that are expunged from the opening. One would think that these would be larger and hotter being closer to earth's core, but apparently that's not the case.
[Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
Re:Some FAR more interesting underwater structures (Score:2)
She also refers to ' limitless, rolling, white sand plains '. Forgetting that 'rolling' suggests something quite different from 'plains', how does she tell what color the sand plains are from a sonar image ? And why haven't these rolling plains been disturbed by detritus/currents/tides ? Why hasn't the color of these plains been distorted by algae/corals/debris ?
Re:What anthropologists say when they don't know (Score:5)
My sister-in-law studied anthro and archeology for about eight years, and she had an interesting story to tell along these lines a few weeks ago -- one of those things that she picked up in college... some of the students at her University had chosen to move into a primitive pseudo-Celtic settlement, in an attempt to study the effect of so-called primitive living on health.
When the research crew came in several months later to quietly observe the "Celts," they discovered a phenomena that had been found in excavations of true Celt villages -- shallow indentations in the floor just inside and to the sides of the doorways. This had always been attributed to unknown religious tradition -- the old standby of previously unexplained phenomena. When they asked one of the "Celts" what the significance was, assuming they were offering pits, or some such, the response rather shocked the researchers:
The "Celt" said, "Oh, that's nothing... every time it rains, the chickens come into the [hut], walk a little way out of the doorway, and flap their wings against the ground for a bit to knock the water off."
Misinformation Capitalizing on the Atlantis Movie? (Score:3)
=-=-=-=-=
Re:Some FAR more interesting underwater structures (Score:2)
--
"I'm not downloaded, I'm just loaded and down"
Re:Um... (Score:2)
The Santorini/Crete is actually one of the most likely answers to the stories of Atlantis, both theese Islands once had some of the most important ports in the mediterraninan (how on earth is that spelled?). The Islands were very rich, and they had some of the most up-to-date technology of that time.
Unfortunately Santorini blew up, and killed all of the Islands inhbitants. I guess that all the sailors that were going to Santorini got kind of surprised when they realised that Santorini had dissapeared (well almost) and killed of most of Crete as well..
Santorini might also be responsible for drowning the Egyptian army that tried to catch Moses as well. Not that I am to interrested in religion, though.
Sorry about my lousy english
Atlantis was found a few weeks ago (Score:2)
Researchers found it off of the coast of cuba while looking for sunken treasure. National Geographic plans an expedition. Art Bell covered it fairly well when it happened.
Hopefully someone will be able to find the link.
Great! (Score:3)
Atlanta (Score:3)
Just be thankful that Ted Turner, Jane Fonda, that guy who invented Coke, and a magician got out before it sank.
----------------------------------------
Um... (Score:5)
It's a bit pessimistic to start right off assuming we're going to lose it.
--
Re:Um... (Score:3)
Well, doesn't that make perfect sense, since they could (and did) strut about all over the land to the South, East and North? I mean, where else was there to put a mythical land, other than West?
Re:They aren't towers of stone. (Score:2)
Yeah sure, and that's not a penis [banzai.net] on the Little Mermaid promo poster... you work for Disney, don't you!