The New Canadarm 8
p3d0 writes: "MacDonald Dettwiler, the company who built the
new robotic arm for the International Space Station,
has a detailed description of how the new arm works."
To communicate is the beginning of understanding. -- AT&T
Re:New Candadarm? (Score:2)
But what's wrong with giving credit where it's due?
--
Re:New Canadarm (Score:2)
--
What is the purpose? (Score:1)
Re:More details on workstation? (Score:1)
(oh, one cool thing is that they can do software updates remotely. I wonder how long until the arm gets hacked, anyone care to start a pool?)
Re:New Candadarm? (Score:1)
America just has put more money in it and it's based on an old scrapped plan for a space station from the Reagan era (which just looked like Mir) and the US politicans don't want any foreigners in charge of it. That is why the US runs it, not because of experience.
New Canadarm (Score:1)
The space station is an international project, and it'll help us all in the end. So what is the US has contributed so much so far? I suppose it doesn't matter that they are perhaps the most experience and richest country in the world. I see this as not only a great learning experience, but a greater step towards international freedom and peace. It'll take time... and it will never be perfect, but when have humans been accused of being perfect? It's the work and effort that counts, not necessarily the end project.
More details on workstation? (Score:1)
You get a lot more detail in the PDFs at the end of the SPDM page [mdrobotics.ca], in particular, this one [mdrobotics.ca]. It gives you a better sense of scale, as some of the diagrams actually show an astronaut working on installing the device. There's also an interesting closeup of the control panel for the workstation. It appears that the three monitors on the workstation can show input from any of ten cameras. A central knob selects which joint of the SPDM the joystick on the right of the console is controlling. Looks kludgy, but pretty functional. They've also got a series of computer renderings that show the SPDM servicing itself (err... replacing a failed component).
Apparently MDA [www.mda.ca] will be providing the Operations Control Software, but I can't find any details about it. EMS [ems-t.com] is responsible for the workstation hardware. Also skimpy on details.
There's some more information on MD Robotics' site about the actual STS-100 mission [mdrobotics.ca].
Not MS (Score:1)