Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Say Goodnight to NEAR 14

Posted by michael from the paperweight dept.
FortKnox writes "Space.com reports that NEAR is running out of light, and isn't expected on receiving any until November, and not having 'full light' until August 2002. They don't believe the innards will live that long. It's tough to see something that wonderful just die a slow death. It would have been grand to see them launch it and return it to put it in a museum. But, then again, some satellites live longer than expected..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Say Goodnight to NEAR More

Say Goodnight to NEAR

Comments Filter:
  • If some highschool kids can get can sats [stanford.edu] up and some college kids can get piocosats [slashdot.org] up and communicate with them, why couldn't NASA find a way to get NEAR back down. Ok Ok, maybe I expect to much.
  • I am not even going to mension the first post aspect of the previous posting. BTW they were actually college and junior high students.... God, I have wasted my life, and I'm OK with that.
  • Maybe it will last and even if it doesn't maybe when people visit such places they'll find something man-made there, so cheer up!
  • Has anyone ever thought that even though we call it an "Economy" satellite that other countries that I will not mention (Russia) might want this. Since it a sophisticated piece of United States Space Technology floating in hibernation in space. Do you think that it will come back? Or will other people (the British with ideas of moving asteroids) try to take the poor piece of US Space Junk, floating helplessly through space. So, Does anyone want to place a bet? Just a thought.
  • What do you want to do? Launch a Lego probe to grab NEAR, bring it safely back to sea level, and sell it on eBay? I'd be tempted to, if I had a cheap launch platform. But it's always about effort and its common representation, money.
  • The San Diego company, Orbital Development, OrbDev [orbdev.com], has owned Eros since 03 Mar 2000 when the company filed a claim at the Archimedes Institute [permanent.com]

    OrbDev's founder, Gregory Nemitz, states that Orbital Development has sent an invoice to Dan Goldin, Head Administrator of NASA, in the amount of $20 for the next century's parking/storage fees for the NEAR spacecraft, now resting on OrbDev's property Eros.

    Nemitz says, "It is not about the money. The invoice was sent to stimulate serious discussion about Property Rights in Space. Twenty cents a year, for a century, is a bargain. Nobody can rightfully say that OrbDev is ripping-off the US Government."

    He also maintains that any agreement on Space Property Rights by the world's Nations could take more than a decade to enact.

    Nemitz goes on to postulate that if OrbDev's claim was recognized by the United Nations as a one-time only experiment in "equity-based space resource development", OrbDev could use that recognized equity in Eros' 80 trillion tons of material to raise the funds to develop all of the Space infrastructure pieces that can also enable Lunar and Martian development.

    Eros development will require new heavy-lift launch vehicles, micro-gee mining equipment, long-term habitation systems, deep space power systems, fuel extraction and storage equipment.

    "The Space Resources Development Industry could be born, while the UN debates the fate of the rest of the Solar System." Nemitz states.

  • So NEAR...

    ...and yet so far.

  • sadly... (Score:3)

    by _anonymity_ ( 320492 ) on Thursday March 01, 2001 @07:43AM (#393542) Homepage
    The importance of the NEAR mission was not its longevity, but its intial accomplishment. NASA was able to plan, launch, and navigate a satellite to a distant and fast-moving body. While this may not seem any different than landing on a planet, one must consider that an asteroid's course is less certain and less predicatble. More impressive than the intial navigation to the asteriod was the feat of landing on a rotating body of rock with unknown surface features. So while this may be the end of NEAR's mission, don't be glum about about the end. Rater, try to admire its accomplishments.
  • This is true, but it would be nice to have in the smithsonian for my children to come and admire the piece of machinery that did something no one imagined before.
    That, or make an idol for a false god outta it... ;-)

    --
  • Even if NEAR never transmits another signal to Earth, it is doing more good on Eros than it would in a terrestrial museum. We can always put replicas in museums if we want something to look at, but I'd get more satisfaction knowing that an Earth probe is still there at this very moment. It's scientific missions completed, NEAR now remains as a symbol of human achievement. When we send another visitor to Eros, NEAR will be there to greet it.
  • While I don't mean to take anything away from the NEAR team, IIRC, the first mission to do something like that was Galieo, which swung by an asteriod on its way to Jupiter...

  • Re:Come On! (Score:4)

    by joto ( 134244 ) on Friday March 02, 2001 @12:35AM (#393546)
    Because:
    • It wasn't decided to land in the first place
    • NASA didn't want to. They decided it would be better to keep it there and gather as much data as they could rather than try flying again which would do nothing for science (although a lot for publicity).
    I am proud NASA made the right decision for once. Gathering data is much more valuable than putting junk into space.
  • Well, if you had the resources to launch a spacecraft, fly up to Eros, pick the right landing spot, grab the sattelite, take off again and bring it safely back to orbit around earth where it can be inspected by astronauts (or taken back down to earth), I really don't think you would learn much from studying NEAR.
  • swung by, yes. but landed on? no.

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Close