
KEO Time Capsule To Remain In Orbit 'Til 52001 AD 262
cascino writes: "CNN is reporting that a French organization under the direction of Jean-Marc Philippe [KEO] is planning on launching a time capsule, called the KEO, next year that will contain electronic messages inscribed on CD's from people around the world. So what, you ask? It is planned to remain in orbit until the year 52001." But wouldn't DVDs hold a lot more data? Perhaps they would like my Visa statements. The cool thing is you can send up to 6,000 characters worth of what you think should be on there.
Re:The case against digital media (Score:2)
It's not going to be that easy, but neither is trying to decipher a written language. It may be that in 50,000 years they will have no concept of a character based language, and as in Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age, they may use a language based upon glyphs, similar to Egyptian hieroglyphics.
The computer abstraction is a rather minor detail, but I think that it more accurately shows how data was transported in the year 2000. We didn't convert things into writing, we used bits.
All the specifics do not matter, as when you encrypt data, just moving it around and adding headers will not stop any decent cryptanalyst. The hardest part, no matter how the languge is preserved, will always be deciphering the language.
God *was* my co-pilot .. (Score:1)
By the way, if you're wondering how he tasted?
Sacra-licious!
Re:Wah (Score:1)
Dont' be, 'cause that's not what I said at all.
What I said is, I think there are better things to hope, dream, and experiment with using this money.
You didn't address the issue of it most probably landing in the ocean and sinking to the bottom (how would people know that it should be something retrieved?). And as to your other points, we've had GREAT difficulty deciphering things that are 5000 years old (and have no real way of judging our accuracy... at best, they are educated guesses that seem to 'fit' all available, if scant, data). 50,000 is HUGE. How much do we know about cave-man language? Nothing. And with the ever increasing pace of change, I think 50,000 years looking back to now will be EVERY bit as difficult, if not more so. After all, their references will be totally alien to us, and ours to them.
As I stated, "Godel, Escher, and Bach" has an interesting section on decoding messages (done in the context of aliens trying to decode messages we leave for them
Another poster posted a very excellent description of why digital media is totally the wrong way to go with this (too many layers of wrappers and encodings and 'frames of reference'). As I stated elsewhere, I think the only *correct* way to go with this would be titanium tablets with deep engravings, or something similar. The CDROM media and all the various encodings used are way too transient within the relm of human existance (only barely arrived here, and will be obsolete in our lifetimes). Better stick with something that has more staying power, don't you think?
- Spryguy
DeCSS (Score:1)
Shrinkwrap NDA (Score:1)
It'll get stolen... (Score:1)
I suppose you could count that under "random debris".
Re:Go visit the KEO site you froot (Score:1)
If you really read my post, you'd get that not only was I saying it was highly unlikely this project would end up serving any purpose, but that the way they're going about it seems to minimize it's success. I didn't attack the concept, but just the implementation.
Using a more 'universal' language, like mathematics and pictures... and using something more concrege like engravings in titanium plates, would make MUCH more sense, and be MUCH more valuable to any eventually finders of this time capsuel. Wouldn't you think?
What I'm interested in is exactly how the meta-data they're including in this project (for how to build a CDROM player and decoder) is being presented, and just how much of this meta-data there is. Is there enough? Is there enough meta-meta-data for them to be able to recognize and decode the meta-data, so that they can recognize and decode the data itself? Wouldn't it be easier to skip all the digital media nonsense, and just jump right into a tutorial on our society and ourselves?
- Spryguy
Always Mount A Spare Monkey (Score:1)
Note to self: When electronic copy of self gets into space in 300 years, epoxy a copy of self to that bird on my way outward. May as well put another copy of self where someone will find it.
See, /. IS relevant. (Score:1)
You just described the bulk of all the /. AC postings.
-pf
Re:The case against digital media (Score:2)
> circular nature.
Hopefully not. DAT data are written diagonally in a helical scan fashion striped across the tape. Making an assupmtion based on the form factor of the medium is not the best idea. It's possible that a future civilization will simply not think about the idea of actually mechanically spinning a storage medium, and will be looking for holographic data created by a laser striking the pits. Circular doesn't help.
> All the specifics do not matter, as when you encrypt data, just moving it around and adding
> headers will not stop any decent cryptanalyst.
Recall, though, that most cryptographic analysis is performed based on known characteristics of the output -- frequency of letters in the target language, for instance.
"Decrypting" a CD is much more analagous to trying to crack a one-time pad cipher, where you don't have any idea what the plaintext looks like, nor whether the output is even textual in nature. For all the analyzing party knows, the CD itself is just a random string of bits to be USED as a one-time pad in some ancient cryptographic system, or a sound recording of white noise (roughly the same thing, actually...).
I'm not saying it's impossible. I'm just saying that it seems to be a very short-sighted way of trying to communicate to the future, putting a lot of unnecessary obstacles in the way of archaeologists. If we're designing a project explicitly for time-capsule use, the fewest possible layers of abstraction would seem to be called for. IMHO.
--
Re:Assorted thoughts... (Score:1)
What about non text data? ... line drawings...
Use a simple vector format like metapost [bell-labs.com] which should be fairly easy to decypher. A gif would probably be dificult to figure out, and a jpg nearly impossable. For bitmaps, pnm is rather simple (asci art would probably be meaningless because they wouldn't know what a 00100101 would look like).
one issue I see.. (Score:2)
----
Decompose? WitherAway? (Score:2)
Hell some phsyco alien might seize it and hold it for randsom. Hopefully we'll have developped giant laser cannons to blow him away by then....
[I've lost it I know..
50,000 years (Score:1)
Representative? (was Re:Freenet/Gnutella?) (Score:1)
My pathetic little message (Score:1)
To the ones who will eventuly read this. Please understand us, we think to live is to make others less importent. While we do try to change many of us never acheive balance and peace, with both the world and with ourselves. If what you believe is that we are in fact savages; than I pity the world that I live in. Because in the end that is the only thing that my generation could do. Live, Breath, and try to love. Although some of those came easier than the others.
Peace be with you and may you live in boring times. D.F
There thats it
Obsolete file formats :-) (Score:1)
Re:Media longevity & players (Score:1)
It the MPAA were involved they would hope to god they got one of the early apex schematics, or the region encoding would simply thwart all attempts to view it.
52001? (Score:1)
Spaceship collisions... (Score:1)
(We might have to use those giant laser cannons to destroy all the time capsules!
-J
Re:My message for the capsule..... (Score:1)
Re:The case against digital media (Score:1)
The alien hears "we are the world, we are the peop (Score:1)
Wait till the MPAA gets a hold of this. (Score:1)
Re:Go visit the KEO site you froot (Score:1)
Let's take this by parts, shall we?
Let's assume that the CD media actually do survive 50k years in the harshness of space, and then survive re-entry. Where exactly do you think it's going to plop down? Probably in the Indian or Pacific Oceans... what if it lands in one of the deep trenches? Do actually think anyone in 50k years will NOTICE its re-entry, and be around to retrieve it? Even assuming there ARE human beings and a reasonably advanced civilization, are they going to care to spend whatever will be necessary to track, locate, and retrieve this thing?
Let's assume they do, or by some miracle, it lands on land, near a population center (without killing anyone), and all the contents are recovered intact. Fine. Not bloody likely, but fine. THEN what? They have to figure out from hieroglyphics how to build a 20th century-based CDROM player from whatever materials and technologies they have on hand, learn how to decode all the contents, rediscover ASCII and "English", and THEN figure out what to make of all the obsolete ancient babble stored on it?
Yeah right. I don't believe any of the above would be likely to happen, but that huge long string of required events? I can't think of much that is less likely...
Isn't there something better we can do with our time and energy and money that would help us NOW, or our immediate progeny? Gawd, I hope so...
- Spryguy
Not to always return to the subject... (Score:1)
The Clock of the Long Now (Score:1)
This is a bad thing. (Score:1)
"Who is this Natalie Portman, and why is she naked, and pertified?"
DMCA (Score:2)
Like the Rosetta Stone, the information will be represented in such a manner so as to facilitate the task of decryption.
YM: "Like the DVD Content Scrambling System, the information will be represented in such a manner so as to facilitate the task of decryption."
I bet the copyright laws of AD 52001 will be so harsh that even reading something in a language other than the national language of your Master State will be considered "circumvention" and actionable under whatever hyped up version of DMCA they've passed by then.
<O
( \
XGNOME vs. KDE: the game! [8m.com]
CDs? (Score:2)
My Message (Score:1)
CDs? Why not 8-track tapes? (Score:1)
They would probably be as useful.
That would be great place to put... (Score:1)
some thoughts on archival... (Score:1)
Do not open till 12/25/52001 (Score:1)
We put that up in space and eventually mankind will forget about it (probably during the next US Presidential sex scandal or Survivor III). When commuter space travel becomes reality and we're all taking weekend trips to the moon in a space age version of a minivan, some teenage kids will park the van somewhere in orbit and have at it. A clunk will be heard on the door and after a sudden bout of panic by the teenagers thinking the space police caught them in the act, they retreive the item and and sell it on eBay as a valued antique...
So how do we make sure it stays in orbit if someone happens to come across it in the future?
Re:CDs? (Score:1)
---
Re:It better be airtight, vacuum sealed... (Score:1)
The thickness difference was caused by the way the glass was originally spun. The process was refined as years went by until they had almost square windows.
As such, it won't deform in space unless some heavy particles hit it, but if it is protected well, bigger objects have a much better chance of destroying it.
Re:CDs? (Score:1)
Anyhow, given the problems they have stopping sattellites crashing into each other these days, what are the odds that the capsule would stay up there for 50,000 years in one piece. They'd have to put it at lunar type distances to have any real degree of surety that it would survive. Why not just put it on the moon?
Or how about making a load of them and sending them out into space in all directions attached to ion drives and Bussard Ram Jets so when we finally get around to colonising space we can pick them up as we go past in our FTL generation ships. Also keep a few copies down here and move them to the lastest recording medium as and when they come about.
Stephen
Re:CDs? (Score:1)
Then again, I guess they could try to include a solar powered CD player and schematics.
Refrag
Re:CD's are a bit out of date, aren't they? (Score:1)
Anyway, "That's not flying, it's falling, with style!" - Buzz Lightyear
-----
Re:CDs? (Score:1)
Refrag
C++ for spoken language? (Score:3)
Re:My 6000 Characters (Score:1)
until (succeed) try { again(); }
Re:irresponsible (Score:1)
-17028
Re:Shrinkwrap NDA (Score:1)
Yeah! (Score:2)
Re:50,000 years... Where will we be? (Score:1)
The only assumption that it's necessary to make is that there will be sentient life at the time. If there is, it's not really relevant what stage of the Enlightenment/Dark Ages cycle that they're in. If they're all just digging in the muck, they'll ignore it. If they're at a point where they are capable of initiating a decoding project, they can.
Either way, the more interesting aspect of it happens now. What does today's humanity feel is important enough or trivial or funny or insightful enough that it should last some unfathomable amount of time? What does humanity feel should be communicated? Graffiti? Threats? Religious tracts? Politics? Science? Love? Music? Art? Code?
For us, right now, what it amounts to is tossing a bottle in the sea. We have no way of knowing that it will survive, find a destination, be picked up, read or cared about by anyone. But everyone feels they have something to say. Why not say it?
What would you say?
---
"The Constitution...is not a suicide pact."
IT WON'T WORK!!! (ANYONE THINK OF THIS?) (Score:1)
Not really (Score:2)
:)
Re:It better be airtight, vacuum sealed... (Score:1)
Dye based burned CDs do, I don't know about gold burns. Regular CD data is pressed glass, so if they use those they might be fine. I say might because except at most extremely cold temperatures, glass eventually moves a little (This is why windowpanes in very old houses are thicker at the bottom. Really.). Given that in an Earth orbit the casing for this thing will get plenty of sunlight, it might be warm enough for the glass to shift a little. Over 50,000 years, that could make the disc unreadable.
Of course, at the same time, it is also likely that the plastic around the glass would hold it in place, at least if the plastic fills in the gaps between the tracks in the glass.
Perhaps someone that knows more about the materials used in a CD could comment further on this?
6000 characters? (Score:1)
Simon
One word message (Score:1)
Really. Isn't there enough space junk?
Re:And how will they read it? (Score:2)
--
Re:posted at the exact same minute (Score:1)
Re:A bit ambitious don't you think... (Score:1)
Now who or whatever finds the object has to not only figure out how to decode the CDROM itself to find its content... but now has to decode different alphabets and grammars and languages and syntaxes -- which means they first have to recognize that there ARE multiple laguages and grammars and such represented in the data! It just adds to the increasingly improbability of this thing ever meaning anything to anyone in any way.
- Spryguy
In the future... (Score:1)
----
Oh my god, Bear is driving! How can this be?
vile heretic! (Score:2)
We all know that while we don't know what computers will do then, or what the language will look like, it *will* be called Fortran . . .
Re:CDs? (Score:1)
Lets put DeCSS in space! (Score:1)
Hmm...is this too obvious? (Score:1)
Before you give me arguments about space being a vacuum and preventing decay, think about a few things. It costs a lot to launch a satellite, and keep it in the atmosphere. We haven't tested satellites staying in the atmosphere anywhere near that long. You've got serious radiation and equipment problems. If the equipment fails, then the orbit slowly decays and like fried bacon there goes your CD's of data.
I'm sure there are plenty of time-capsule projects on earth right now (didn't some tv channel do something around Y2K?). However, those do not get nearly the publicity as the coolness factor of space. Face it, it'd be easier, cheaper, and probably more reliable to get a safe location on the earth. Bury it in the ocean, in a mountain, or something. Put it at the bottom of the big crater in Arizona (right in the middle). Make it transmit a radio signal when it's ready to be opened, or make it very public knowledge where it is, put it in history books for others to read. You can store more stuff, you've basically got unlimited space. It can be airtight, in several layers, to have similar benefits to space. It can be fireproof, or perhaps taken care of by an organization for a few hundred/thousand years, which checks up on it every decade to make sure it's still intact. I dunno, space is cool, but orbit doesn't seem perfect to keep something preserved - too many problems.
On another thought, why not launch it onto the moon and embed itself there? Then it could transmit in 50,000 years, and probably be relatively untouched. It won't go away, will only be subject to radiation and not orbit problems, and faces a much better chance of staying put. Now that'd be cool.
My message... (Score:1)
#include <stdlib.h>
int main (int argc, char* argv[])
{
printf("Hello, future!\n") ;
return EXIT_SUCCESS ;
}
Re:CDs? (Score:1)
Hope they also plan to include a manual that describe the data structure of all those optical pits and valleys.
CD's are not archival and have a failure rate!!! (Score:1)
Vacume smacume, what about radiation and extreme temperature shift? I think this is a cool idea but they better be using something other than standard cd's.
Contamination (Score:1)
Re:6,000 characters (Score:1)
B: 42
A: ?
B: That's all that's there. The number 42.
Re:50,000 years... Where will we be? (Score:1)
I damn well hope so. I want to get bored and make baby universes or something. Someone get Stephen Hakwing to stop wasting time on faster than light travel and have him work on that idea!
Re:Assorted thoughts... (Score:1)
(Half OT)In 52001, what will we look like? (Score:2)
Several futurists have speculated on what the human race will look like in the future, and they have come up with:
Make sure to take this into account when designing content for the space capsule's CD-ROM collection.
<O
( \
XGNOME vs. KDE: the game! [8m.com]
Re:The case against digital media (Score:1)
language conventions will survive longer than
digital encoding conventions. I see no reason to
think so. If we found a slab of rock with charac-
ters written 50k years ago, with no relation to
any modern language, we'd never decode it. How do
you think egyptian language was decoded? They found
a slab where message was written in both greek and
egyptian (written when one of Alexander the Macedonian's heirs was a pharaoh there). Before that, nobody was even close. That's even though whole damn egypt is covered in engravings, and language is still alive (I think). And, that's something like 2500(?) years since it was widely used there to engrave. If they want them to easily learn the language, they have to leave drawings, alot of them. Every word in the dictionary with a visual illustration. Engraved on stainless steel. These guys are probably hoping that either conventions of encoding will survive (which is a bit silly, if they do, why not full archive of the internet?), or that posterity will be much smarter than us.
Yeah, 52001 too distant (Score:1)
I also think it would be more useful to *include* a playback device (rather than a manual for constructing one) as well as a suggestion that, if this message is received, *then* you try something longer term (and include this data with it, adding to it whatever you think is appropriate).
Also, I don't know what the plans are, but I sure hope they have some major electromagnetic disturbance being transmitted in conjunction with this satellite's de-orbiting; something to get the attention of the planet's inhabitants.
Just think, 1000-2000 years ago there's sure a lot of information that would be interesting to historians today. 50,000 years ago? The human race was almost unrecognizable, civilization didn't even exist (did it?), and there would be some very disappointing holes left in history in the meantime.
Think about it. Is there *anything* madmade in the world at all that has ever survived near that long. The oldest manmade things I can thing of are about 5,000 years old, and hard to find (and piece together) at that. Sure space might not weather away at an object, but the atmosphere is also protective. This satellite will be subject to super-high-speed micrometeorites and solar effects etc. for thousands of years.
Fun?? We don't know... (Score:2)
Anyone remember the old Honda motor bike commercials? Children are walking through a museum of the future, and they come across a motorbike:
Curator: And here we have a motorbike -- people used to ride them for fun!
Children: Fun?? Ffffuuuunnnn...
Child (UK accent): But why would anyone want to ride a motorbike for fun?
Curator (slow, puzzled voice): We ... don't ... know...
It was pretty funny in a bizarre way.
--
Re:We could send the entire history (Score:1)
Hell, I also miss MEEPT!!! who was probably the original of the true original ppl here. Defender of MS, writer of obscure posts, and the poster boy for /. flames. Oh well, I guess that Sengan is back (Rambus story today). We should set a pool to see when ppl start flaming him again.
The best message EVER! (Score:1)
Did you say H.G. Wells? (Score:2)
"Morlocks" is one of the two future races from H. G. Wells's The Time Machine (which I've mirrored [8m.com]). Morlocks look like orcs from Tolkien's LotR. Their main diet is people of the Eloi race, who look like those figurines [preciousmoments.com] your wife/sister/aunt collects.
But all this may be OT, as the time traveller from the story went past AD 52,001 all the way to AD 802,701.
<O
( \
XGNOME vs. KDE: the game! [8m.com]
CD useful lifespan (Score:2)
LK
Re:Spaceship collisions... (Score:2)
"Aw dammit, we have to about the mission. Damned monkeys!"
And our starships would most likely be contructed in space. But those vehicles that get you to our space station / space port might have a hard time. Might be like rush hour traffic or a futuristic version of "Frogger".
Re:The case against digital media (Score:2)
simple solution to that problem:
Oh, and while you're at it, you might get your engraver to add crucial bits of the various CD recording standards.
If you see what archaeologists can figure out with stuff just dumped around randomly, I have do doubt that the archaeologists of 50,000 years from now will be able to figure this stuff out.
I still like the idea mentioned in a past Slashdot story of engraving stuff really small onto (metallic?) discs. That way all you need is a 1800's-era microscope to get useful information.
Re:The case against digital media (Score:2)
We are in a pickle, but any method of preservation that does not encrypt the data can be thought of as essentially the same: no plain text, no sense of the output.
But it will take a long time to decipher any method we choose.
Just in case people forget the calendar (Score:2)
Then they get this time capsule that opens and says, "It's been 52,001 years since the birth of Jesus Christ!" Of course, if it gets to that, then the response will be, "Jesus who?"
--
Re:DeCSS? (Score:2)
Gerv
Re:The case against digital media (Score:2)
"damn Mac shit" he'll mutter, and toss the whole lot.
if it ain't broke, then fix it 'till it is!
Re:CD's are a bit out of date, aren't they? (Score:2)
Re: Spaceship collisions... (Score:2)
Jean Marc Philippe's Website (Score:4)
-------------------
Freenet/Gnutella? (Score:3)
sulli
Assorted thoughts... (Score:2)
The idea of free text space for all is wonderful. I'm thinking about adding something myself... and this really would be a boon to anthropologists if, say, all electronic historical records were to be wiped sometime in the future.
What is the structural composition of a CD? Would it break down in (presumably) vacuum under the influence of solar and stellar radiation? In less than 50,000 years? That could prove a problem, if it is the case.
Anyone else suddenly think of the gold disks on (I think) Voyager when they read this? Sort of the same idea, except across time instead of space...
What about non text data? Can't we get an allowance for (under 6Kb) graphics in here too? (OK, so that's a little small for photos, but I'd like to try diagrams, math in geometric form, modern physics stuff that might require line drawings...)
The last word (Score:4)
Re:CD's are a bit out of date, aren't they? (Score:5)
Even if the satellite survives, how do I know my message will?
The CD-ROMs on which the messages will be stored underwent exhaustive testing in July 1998 at the National Grand Accelerator of Heavy Ions (GANIL). The CD-ROMs were exposed to the equivalent of 50,000 years' of cosmic radiation in GANIL's particle accelerator and passed with flying colors. Despite the heavy exposure, the disks remained intact and legible.
How will our distant descendants be able to read our messages?
It's obvious that today's state-of-the-art technology in data storage, the laser reader, will be obsolete and totally forgotten by then. At any rate, it would be impossible to include one in the cargo due to its prohibitive volume and innate fragility. We are therefore currently drafting a "user manual" using simple symbolic images to explain how to construct a CD player so as to be able to access the content of the disks. Like the Rosetta Stone, the information will be represented in such a manner so as to facilitate the task of decryption.
Radiation (Score:2)
Re:I feel sorry for those future Anthropologists (Score:2)
(Don't blame me... Slashdot is screwing up my links!)
Re:Assorted thoughts... (Score:2)
Apparently, there's also going to be a 'library' of world history and current events, portraits of a diverse group of people, an astronomical clock showing when it was launched, and an artificial diamond containing samples of seawater, human blood, air, and soil.
Can anyone else tell that the initiator of the project is an artist, not an engineer?
DeCSS? (Score:3)
My message for the capsule..... (Score:5)
In 52001, the inhabitants of Earth will capture a sattelite and take it to Outpost Headquarters where paleologists will unlock it and find inside small platters of glass....
"Look," they will say, "perfectly preserved glass platters that our ancient ancestors used for record-keeping once! And they're remarkably well preserved!"
Many years are spent, graduate students (if they still exist in 52001) come and go having completed dissertations on the decoding of the Orbital Glass Platters, thousands will wonder what the ancients used to think were important. Eventually they manage to decode some of the Ancient Tounge, with a mere 50,000 words in it, barely enough to fill a single memory cell in one of the millions of cockroachbots that comprise a part of the Human galactic ecosystem.
Once the initial progress is made, it is only a matter of seconds before a fully aware translator is coded, compiled, and executed to start the drudging work of making sense of the Ancient Glass Platters. Word spreads out from Earth through the networks of spaceborne miniroaches via radio, until thousands of years later the full content of the platters spreads throughout the Human galaxy. Our decendents will wonder at the strange and quaint sense of humor of the ancients, who were just beginning the age of mass communication and intelligent robotics.
"What," they will wonder, "is 'first post' supposed to mean?"
The Tyrrany Begins.... [fearbush.com]
Re:A bit ambitious don't you think... (Score:2)
Not everthing begins and ends in the US, and not everything is written or spoken in English -- Yes, that's true, technology exists outside the Ameri-bubble!
The case against digital media (Score:2)
Consider these scenarios. 50,000 years from now, our descendants uncover a long-buried city. New York, let's say. They find many inscriptions carved into rock and marble and metal, and can recognize this as language and start to work on it. There's almost no abstraction -- visual symbols encoding meaning. A direct long-lasting representation of our words and thoughts. A difficult exercise, but one with clear and direct input data.
Up in space, space, however, another group of descendants finds an orbiting collection of CD media. What are they? There's no telling. Closer inspection reveals that the surfaces of the discs contain microscopic pits in ordered rows. Aha, the ancients have recorded something in binary on here. But the effort grinds to a halt, right there.
How do they even know what the pits represent? Is a pit a 0 and a flat space a 1? Or vice versa? Or is the disk encoded in that skip-bop format where a pit means flip-the-bit and a flat space means don't? Or vice versa? Or something altogether else? Does the bitstream start on the outside edge and read inward clockwise? Does it spiral from inside to outside edge, reading counter-clockwise? Where does it start? Where does it end?
And then, suppose they guess right and get past that part. Then they have have 0110101010010101010101001101101010101010101010... for days. What is it? Which bits of this are significant meaning, and which are meta meaning? Is there a format-specific header? How long is it and what does it mean? Are the data written into a filesystem, and if so, which parts are inodes or FAT tables or the like? How do they extract the actual significance from the housekeeping data?
And suppose again that they somehow guess correctly, or that it's all just written out as raw data, and the above questions are somehow moot. What format? ASCII? Unicode? Will the folks from the future know that we thought in terms of 8-bit bytes? Will they remember ASCII or UTF-8? Will there be endian issues? How will they know to try to read it as text, as opposed to JPG or MP3 or any of an arbitrarily huge number of other formats that may not have even been invented yet?
All of these layers of abstraction are taken care of for us by our digital toys, but people in the future will almost assuredly have no idea about the layout of the physical CDROM format and ASCII and ISO9660 and all of the layers and layers of stuff they'd have to weed through just to get to the actual LANGUAGE on the CD that we're wanting them to take the time to decode.
Somehow I'm still sold on the letters-carved-deep-into-rock encoding scheme as the best way to talk to the future.
--
Guarantee Readability (Score:2)
--
A bit ambitious don't you think... (Score:2)
Hypothetically speaking, when the craft is recovered in 52001 by whatever intelligent race occupies the Earth at that time (yet another variable, you had better hope the evolution and extinction of species is on your side and an intelligent race is present, otherwise game over...), what is potential that they could ever decipher something as complicated as the English language. We would be far better served to send something a bit more universal such as a visual media or something based on mathematics. Programming code, pick your favorite flavor, would even be more desirable considering much of the underlying principles are rooted in mathematics and the use of variables.
Only under these extreme and diverse circumstances do I believe that such an undertaking would be of any benefit and do more than simply confuse the receivers of this package.
But hey, what do I know... J
Re:I feel sorry for those future Anthropologists (Score:2)
Slashdot post, 2000 AD: CD ROM, 52001 AD:
Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
It beats its wings (Score:2)
I can't believe they're making this thing beat its wings. Surely, the time spent figuring that part out could have been better spent. Plus, won't that make the metals break down more quickly and effect the orbit and generally cause other problems?
Although, perhaps it will intrigue our target audience enough to make them take a look at it.
Re:From the CD-Recordable FAQ (Score:2)
Remember, this is going to me in a vacuum, so these CD-ROMs might survive a whole lot better than you think.