Phrogman writes:
"The most detailed images of the surface of Saturn's mysterious moon Titan have now been made public. There is more information in an article on Spaceref located here." Interestingly, the photos show three distinct bright areas around Titan's equator.
Gattaca? (Score:1)
.
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:3)
---
Resolution? (Score:1)
They look like first generation 3D cards did, with
a texture slapped on something that resembles a
circle.
Methinks they could use a wee bit of FSAA around the edges there!
Re:It's not "the most detailed". (Score:2)
HST has a 2 micron filter. The filter is used with NICMOS which is currently not working. NICMOS is scheduled to be fixed for the next servicing mission, assuming it ever flies.
Adaptive optics is quite promising for planetary science. Soon we will be getting HST quality images from the ground with these techniques. Just don't ask me how soon soon is....
For propaganda about Adaptive Optics, check out the CfAO homepage [ucolick.org]
Floating 'for a few minutes' (Score:1)
To answer my own question, perhaps the low temperature of the 'water' will eventually reduce the effectiveness of whatever the probe uses for boyancy?
Then again, maybe its waterwings will freeze and shatter :)
What's so mysterious about it? (Score:3)
Re:Low Cost? - Not at all. (Score:2)
I guess the Cassini/huygens mission is the most expensive planetary project of the last 15 (and the next 5) years - Cassini's weight is 5.6 metric tons when fueled and the mission will last over 11 years. (What`s interesting: Most parts of the flight software have not been written yet and will be uploaded before Cassini reaches it's destination.)
Check out Cassini's or Huygen's web pages for more information:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/cassini/
http://sci.esa.int/huygens/
Life? (Score:1)
On a related topic ( kind of), the moon Europa is also supposed to have life.
Re:What resolution. (Score:1)
Re: Cassini gets software upgrade! (Score:2)
the new sofware will allow steadier pointing of imagers during capture etc. and therefore sharper pictures to be taken by the probe. uploading the last of the software upgrades will be completed in just over two weeks.
You don't have to hate America (Score:4)
Why do you think we call them English units anyway, when the English, like the rest of the civilized world, switched to metric decades ago? Because if we called them "American units" we couldn't stand the shame.
"My car gets 17 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!"
Vonnegut Nonsense (Score:1)
Message ends.
Re:What's so mysterious about it? (Score:1)
Click Dough's anti-spam policy [clickdough.com]
--
Re:Resolution? (Score:2)
Well sure, that's because that's what it is. Space is all a hoax and the back of the moon is cardboard and plywood.
"Methinks they could use a wee bit of FSAA around the edges there!"
FSAA == full screen anti aliasing. How would you apply that to the edges of the moon in that image exactly? And if it's already pixelated, anti aliasing it will just cover up (badly) the jagged edges and make for one fuzzy photo. What you want is more pixels.
^-- Mod parent up & More ground telescopes. (Score:1)
I was just about to write about this..
Thank you.
//Frisco
--
"No se rinde el gallo rojo, sólo cuando ya está muerto."
Poor resolution caused by laws of physics (Score:5)
Classically, the blurring is caused by scattering of light by the edges of the telecope. The narrower a "slit" you pass light through, the greater the scattering. If you mount a pair of razor blades a hair's breadth apart and shine a laser through, you'll see bands of light on a wall on the other side from the diffraction. As you move the blades apart (make the opening bigger), the bands get smaller.
A telescope is like a really big diffraction slit. The problem here also is that the amount of diffraction is determined by the wavelength of light, so that an image taken in the infrared will always have poorer resolution than the same object taken in visible light. There is also atmospheric distortion to contend with.
Radio waves have very long wavelengths, so a single dish telescope resolves very poorly (like a degree or so). But because the frequency is manageably low you can record the phase on tape and later digitize the signals and combine them from more than one dish you can do interferometry with radio telescopes in a practical way - even interferometry using the whole width of the earth as a baseline. In principle you could have dishes orbiting in different places around the sun and get enormous resolution.
There is a limited amount of optical interferometry going on too, combining the beam of two or more telescopes, as with the 10 meter on mauna kea - they're building a second to use as an interferometer.
Quantum mechanically, you cannot know the product of the location of a particle and its momentum better than about Planck's constant h/2 PI. Putting a particle through a slit determines its position with some certainty and so its momentum across the slit becomes undetermined by a corresponding amount.
With a very narrow slit and a laser beam the uncertainty is large so the photons are scattered as much as a foot or two to either side passing across a room. But passing through the aperture of a 3.6 meter mirror the uncertainty introduced is actually fairly low, so the resolution of a big telescope is high.
One thing you gotta realize is the apparant diameter as viewed from earth is really miniscule. Look up the actual diameter of Titan in an ephemeris and the distance of both Saturn and the Eart from the Sun (earth is 93 million miles) and you can figure out the solid angle it takes up in the sky at closest approach. It's really tiny!
For comparison, the usual resolution of most earth-based telescopes is limited to about a quarter of an arc-second on a really good night.
Up until recently the biggest telescope in the world was the 200" at Palomar Mountain, and it couldn't get nearly the quality of photos of Jupiter and Saturn that the space probes sent by NASA did.
Re: Cassini gets software upgrade! (Score:1)
Well according to their website here [nasa.gov] it is indeed radio based and you should be thinking in terms of giving commands to your TV with a remote control rather than expecting a SYN ACK-type scenario. It also seems that to press the buttons on your remote control, requires 6 or more teams. Madness.
These are high resolution ? (Score:2)
until (succeed) try { again(); }
Re:You don't have to hate America (Score:1)
But even using metric units, during my astrophysics degree, you had to face the problem of SI vs CGS units (Joules vs ergs, etc.).
Nothing's ever easy!
Re:Obi-Wan Kenobi is dead. (Score:1)
Not surprising really. It was a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away. He was in a fight with the bloke with the big black helmet - then he gave himself to the force. He may not be dead, merely in another form.
--Liam.
Re:Life? (Score:1)
Spaceref.com server (Score:1)
Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0
Ahh, that explains it!
Re:You don't have to hate America (Score:1)
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:1)
If you are using hydrogen for fusion, you don't need very much, and can actually collect enough from the `vacuum' of space. The faster you go, the more you can collect. I think the retarding force due to `air resistance' in space equals the propulsive force that can be obtained from the hydrogen at around 0.25*c. This kind of puts a limit on how fast a space ship can conventionally go. I forget where I read that, and I may not remember exactly, but the idea is the same.
I know what's in TWO of the bright spots... (Score:1)
The first bright spot is the former Kree base where several Eternals now live [sigma.net].
The second one is the colony of telepaths where Imra Ardeen will come from [proudrobot.com] in the 29th century.
But I'm not sure about the third one...life = chemical inequilibrium (Score:3)
These are just the best GROUND images of Titan. (Score:2)
I think those are much higher resolution...
it's different wavlengths (Score:1)
Is this news? (Score:2)
Oh, you're talking about the moon Titan. Sorry :-)
- Joe
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:1)
For those, by the way, who hate America, and all of it's systems, that's 111.7 K.
Amazing (Score:1)
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:3)
Melting Point: -182.5 C
And that's probably at 1 atmosphere. I doubt there's anywhere near that kind of pressure on Titan. I would think that would mean that it would have to be colder than that there.
http://www2.ke ck.hawaii.edu:3636/realpublic/gen_info/news/titan. html [hawaii.edu] says it has "a surface temperature of minus 180 degrees Celsius (- 290 F)"
Don't lick any flagpoles, doorknobs, or train tracks on your next trip there.
Re:Low Cost? - Not at all. (Score:1)
Of course, if the arrive date is only 4 years away, common sense says that it's already been launched.
smack(this);
-------------------
Most parts of the flight software have not been written yet and will be uploaded before Cassini reaches it's destination
Sign me up!
--
Ice ice baby (Score:1)
Interestingly, it's probably ice!
Re:Life? (Score:1)
Mauna Kea (Score:1)
Me and my buddy once tried to take a rental car to this place. 1st off, rental cars are banned from the saddle road that eventually leads to the Mauna Kea access road. F*ck this. So off we went. Then as we went up towards Mauna Kea we eventually reached the end of the paved road at 9000 ft. The top of Mauna Kea is greater than 13000 ft. So up we went. After we passed the sign that said 11,000 ft our rental car died due to lack of air.
At this altitiude the view was spectacular. Another volcano (Mauna Loa) was visible above the clouds. The unpaved road up there is basically cinder. So we turned the car around, and coasted down hill.
I saw a great picture of one of my Profs who was up there with a hangover. It showed him lying flat down in some snow. Altitude and hangovers do not mix. BTW, it does snow in Hawaii. You just have to be really high to see this. Really high in Hawaii doesn't necessarily mean pakalolo.:)
Re:Poor resolution caused by laws of physics (Score:1)
Re: Cassini gets software upgrade! (Score:1)
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:2)
Re: Cassini gets software upgrade! (Score:1)
Two weeks?? And I thought ftping the RedHat source over a 28.8 connection took a long time.
I wonder what protocol they're using to upgrade their software. It's gotta be some kind of stateless connection (imagine it: SYN ACK ...). Maybe just a radio broadcast, with something like a FIN containing the checksum of the received data. Anyone have any clues?
I'll throw in the obligatory M$ slam by saying "Imagine having to reboot a computer 1.3 billion miles from home after a software upgrade."
Re:You don't have to hate America (Score:1)
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:1)
I triple dog-dare you to lick a flagpole on Titan
---CONFLICT!!---
Re:Life? (Score:1)
Re:Obi-Wan Kenobi is dead. (Score:1)
:(
It still isn't offtopic. Sir Alec is dead and I am
Oceans of methane? (Score:2)
Anybody know what the boiling point of methane is? Titan must be pretty damn cold...
Resolution (Score:1)
Low Cost? (Score:3)
I hope this won't be another 'Low Cost' mission, or else it'll never get all the way to Saturn.
But seriously, it's good to know that NASA's got funding to be doing far-reaching stuff like that. It'll be interesting to see when that actually gets off the ground, though.
--
Big fucking deal. (Score:5)
I had lunch a Las Margaritas today. There is an identical atmosphere around my cubicle.
--Shoeboy
obligatory mirror (Score:4)
http://dotslash.dynodns.net/00/08/06/215241/titan_ pueo.html [dynodns.net]
Naturally, if anyone of any authority wants it down, mail me and let me know.
What resolution. (Score:1)
It's not "the most detailed". (Score:5)
Now, HST (as several posters have pointed out) has "higher resolution" pictures. But that's at 0.9 microns, which is a factor of 2 smaller than 2 microns. HST does not have a 2 microns filter (methinks), so they can't see Titan from there.
So the phrase "most detailed" has a lot of qualification to it.
The interesting result is that they found bright spots, but the statement in their report of mountaineous regions corresponding to albedo (i.e. reflected light) peaks is flaky and almost careless given their scientific pedigree. Bright spots does not correspond to high areas.
The point is that a liquid sea of methane usually is low in albedo, since methane absorbs light even at low wavelength. SO bright spots means that there might actually be "dry" land on the surface.
Re:Oceans of methane? (Score:1)
Anybody know what the boiling point of methane is? Titan must be pretty damn cold...
Methane (CH4)
Boiling Point: -161.5 C
Melting Point: -182.5 C
Cold, anyway.
more info... (Score:2)
Not a very slick, but a very informative site.
Re:Fuel (Score:2)
Once this is done, exploriation would be cake, so long as we know which fuel sources are available on the destination.
Ground Based ? Fsck that! (Score:3)
Check these out:
Hubble Space Telescope Images of Titan's Surface [arizona.edu]
Other Titan Info/Statistics [solarviews.com]
nf
Re:Fuel (Score:1)