Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Gene Editing Makes Bacteria-killing Viruses Even More Deadly (arstechnica.com) 20

An anonymous reader shares a report: Broad-spectrum antibiotics are akin to nuclear bombs, obliterating every prokaryote they meet. They're effective at eliminating pathogens, sure, but they're not so great for maintaining a healthy microbiome. Ideally, we need precision antimicrobials that can target only the harmful bacteria while ignoring the other species we need in our bodies, leaving them to thrive. Enter SNIPR BIOME, a Danish company founded to do just that. Its first drug -- SNIPR001 -- is currently in clinical trials. The drug is designed for people with cancers involving blood cells. The chemotherapy these patients need can cause immunosuppression along with increased intestinal permeability, so they can't fight off any infections they may get from bacteria that escape from their guts into their bloodstream.

The mortality rate from such infections in these patients is around 15-20 percent. Many of the infections are caused by E. coli, and much of this E. coli is already resistant to fluoroquinolones, the antibiotics commonly used to treat these types of infections. The team at SNIPR BIOME engineers bacteriophages, viruses that target bacteria, to make them hyper-selective. They started by screening 162 phages to find those that would infect a broad range of E. coli strains taken from people with bloodstream or urinary tract infections, as well as from the guts of healthy people. They settled on a set of eight different phages. They then engineered these phages to carry the genes that encode the CRISPR DNA-editing system, along with the RNAs needed to target editing to a number of essential genes in the E. coli genome. This approach has been shown to prevent the evolution of resistance. After testing the ability of these eight engineered phages to kill the E. coli panel alone and in combination, they decided that a group of four of them was the most effective, naming the mixture SNIPR001. But four engineered phages do not make a drug; the team confirmed that SNIPR001 remains stable for five months in storage and that it does not affect any other gut bacteria.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gene Editing Makes Bacteria-killing Viruses Even More Deadly

Comments Filter:
  • Gene exchange (Score:1, Flamebait)

    by sinij ( 911942 )
    Why is this a good idea? We know that gene exchange and jumping genes is a thing. What stops these genes going from a virus that eliminates pathogens to virus that eliminates us?
  • Phage therapy (Score:4, Informative)

    by Viol8 ( 599362 ) on Monday May 08, 2023 @03:38PM (#63507221) Homepage

    Is as old as antibiotics. Problem is it's rather slow to work and phages might not pass into the blood to attack any bacteria there and even if they do the immune system will attack them stressing sick patients even more. In the meantime the patient could die.

    • Re:Phage therapy (Score:4, Insightful)

      by njvack ( 646524 ) <njvack@wisc.edu> on Monday May 08, 2023 @05:33PM (#63507471)

      In this case, the bacteria are already in the bloodstream and the patient's immune system is suppressed.

      Anyhow, phages will not replace antibiotics, but having a targeted way to treat bacteremia in chemo patients seems like a nice tool for the toolbox.

      Here's hoping the trials work out!

  • Not clear from headline or summary.
  • Seems like we've been waiting ages for people to notice nature's alternative to antibiotics. With all the talk of MRSA and superbugs, it's sad to see money being thrown at new antibiotics year after year only to be rendered largely ineffective in short order.
    • Re:About time (Score:5, Informative)

      by zeeky boogy doog ( 8381659 ) on Monday May 08, 2023 @04:44PM (#63507375)
      They would remain effective much longer, but it's not legal for doctors to cunt/dick-punt people who come in with a viral illness and persist in demanding antibiotics after it's explained why they are not called for.

      Meanwhile it IS, however, legal to mix them at low concentrations into farm feed.

      Both of which are basically the answer to "how can I make bacteria evolve resistance to this ASAP?"
      • by Hodr ( 219920 )

        Overprescription for people isn't a big issue. Giving someone who doesn't have a bacterial based illness is not likely to cause that non-existent bacteria to mutate into a super bug.

        Not finishing your prescription is a much bigger issue.

        Feeding antibiotics en-masse to animals is also an issue, though again not likely to result in superbugs for humans.

        How often do you read about antibiotic-resistant baceria. They are usually found in medical facilities, often coming from chronically ill immuno compromised p

  • >The team at SNIPR BIOME engineers bacteriophages, viruses that target bacteria, to make them hyper-selective.

    Like, seriously, can we cut it out with the "engineered" viruses already! As reported by NPR, the NY Times, Washington Post, etc, these viruses came from a natural spillover in a wet market in Copenhagen. Luckily Twitter and Facebook have banned this obvious conspiracy theory and misinformation! Maybe Slashdot should follow suit.

"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.

Working...