Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space NASA Robotics

NASA Targets Venus, Asteroids With Potential Missions 47

coondoggie writes: NASA this week picked five possible contenders for a relatively low-cost robotic mission to space. The five candidates from a batch of 27 –include Venus, near-Earth object and asteroid operations – will ultimately be whittled down to one or two that will cost approximately $500 million, not including launch vehicle or post-launch operations, NASA stated. The DAVINCI probe would "study the chemical composition of Venus' atmosphere during a 63-minute descent. It would answer scientific questions that have been considered high priorities for many years, such as whether there are volcanoes active today on the surface of Venus and how the surface interacts with the atmosphere of the planet." A longer-range spacecraft called Lucy would "perform the first reconnaissance of the Jupiter Trojan asteroids, objects thought to hold vital clues to deciphering the history of the solar system."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NASA Targets Venus, Asteroids With Potential Missions

Comments Filter:
  • miss a lot of interesting rocks that way.
  • PASA surprassed this last week by proposing a mamission to the sun. They're going at night.

  • by bigpat ( 158134 ) on Friday October 02, 2015 @10:30AM (#50644927)
    The one mission I think could be really excellent would be an atmospheric probe of Venus that could float around the upper atmosphere where it is at a pressure nearly equivalent to earth. So far most probes haven't lasted very long, so it would be an engineering challenge with the potential to send back some really amazing images from the cloud layer. And forget mars, venus is the most promising place in the Solar System for its terraforming and habitability potential, *all you need to do* is remove enough Carbon from the atmosphere and you end up with plenty of oxygen. An airship could explore, take samples and test a CO2 converter. Heck just throw a plant on there and see if you can keep it alive.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      Creating habitable space on Venus would be fairly easy. As you say, the upper atmosphere isn't that bad, so all you need is a balloon, and fortunately a breathable atmosphere doubles as a lifting gas when set among the denser CO2 of the atmosphere outside. You can live among the support structures of your mega-zeppelin.

      Terraforming is a much bleaker prospect though.

      The heat is bad. If you were somehow able to stop all incoming sunlight, completely shut down the radioactive decay feeding Venus' core heat, an

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Venus could be the most Earthlike planet from size and gravity perspective, but it would also be the most difficult to terraform. As you noted you would have to remove massive amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere and somehow neutralize the less pleasant compounds. Then there is the problem with the fact that it is tidally locked to the sun so one side always faces the sun (or at least it rotates very slowly). So you would either have to somehow engineer the environment to help equalize the temperature betw

      • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

        If we use the progressive-domino-slingshot effect, perhaps we can smash a big icy asteroid into Venus at a angle that gives it a faster rotation, and knocks the carbon out of the atmosphere.

    • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

      *all you need to do* is remove enough Carbon from the atmosphere...

      We are having trouble removing it from Earth's, and we have far less.

      • by bigpat ( 158134 )

        *all you need to do* is remove enough Carbon from the atmosphere...

        We are having trouble removing it from Earth's, and we have far less.

        The Earth used to have a lot more carbon in the atmosphere until all these pesky living things started photosynthesizing.

        • by dryeo ( 100693 )

          Those pesky living things depend on hydrogen, in the form of H2O, of which there is a severe lack of on Venus.

    • by dryeo ( 100693 )

      There's a severe lack of hydrogen on Venus, so no water and much too much oxygen if it is possible to remove the carbon.

  • by GuB-42 ( 2483988 ) on Friday October 02, 2015 @10:41AM (#50645015)

    https://xkcd.com/1456/ [xkcd.com] (title text)

    • Some years ago, Jerry Pournelle pointed out that we are farther away from being able to land a man on the moon than we were in 1960. And since he said that, the respect-for-science problem has gotten even worse.

  • While the surface is hell, I remember reading somewhere that the upper atmosphere of Venus is actually quite balmy. With its thick atmosphere, Venus would be the perfect place to launch an airship or other lighter than air vehicle. Maybe it can support not just balloons but even a floating "air" station that seems like the better alternative to a Martian space colony.
    • A manned mission to Venus was on the drawing boards in the early 1970's, including a Russian flyby of Venus on the way to Mars.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manned_Venus_Flyby [wikipedia.org]

    • by dryeo ( 100693 )

      A breathable atmosphere is a lifting gas on Venus and the temperature is good at the height where the Venus atmosphere is 1 bar. The big problem is the amount of corrosive acid in the atmosphere. I believe there are pretty good winds at that altitude as well.

  • Hey, IAU... (Score:2, Funny)

    by pla ( 258480 )
    "Jupiter trojan asteroids"???

    Wait, you mean the formerly-known-as-a-planet "Jupiter" has failed to clear its orbit?

    Quick, someone let the IAU know! This error in nomenclature simply cannot stand!
  • Including landers, returning pics from the surface. http://mentallandscape.com/V_V... [mentallandscape.com]

Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.

Working...