4.0 Earthquake Near Concord, California 128
craighansen writes: Just felt a small earthquake, which I confirmed at USGS was a magnitude 4.0 at 2015-05-03 22:13:19 UTC, followed by a magnitude 2.7 a minute later, both located near Concord, California.
A story for those who (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
ALSO... (Score:5, Funny)
I looked out the window today in Seattle and saw what looked like water falling from the sky. It was collecting on the ground in puddle and making cars wet. I just consulted the NOAA website and confirmed that there was indeed "precipitation" in the Seattle area. Stay tuned for updates.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A story for those who don't understand orders of magnitude?
To be fair, Dice Holdings is located in Urbandale, Iowa. It's not like they get many earthquakes in that part of the US.
Re:A story for those who (Score:5, Informative)
Below are the California earthquakes of equal or greater magnitude (i.e., not much to speak of) this year...
The point is, a 4.0 earthquale is NOT NEWS! Sorry
5/3 4.01 in Concord
4/24 2 quakes at 5.5 off the coast near Eureka
4/10 4 quakes: 4.5, 4.5, 4.85, & 4.8 off the coast near Eureka
3/30 4.02 in Baker
3/27 4.2 near Fresno
2/14 4.49 near Death Valley
1/29 4.26 near Eureka
1/28 2 quakes: 5.14 & 5.6 near Eureka
1/20 2 quakes: 4.71 & 4.9 near Monterey
1/14 4.06 near Eureka
1/4 4.5 near Santa Clarita
1/1 5.3 off the coast near Eureka
Re: (Score:2)
Re:A story for those who (Score:4, Funny)
Speak for yourself. My lander was near the epicenter and I lost five crew :( I was aiming for Diablo Canyon to pick up some radioactives but I had to return to orbit to recrew.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't put it on the front page. I did follow up with a comment that this was a group of 4 quakes, the first of which, magnitude 2.5 was about 10 minutes before the largest at magnitude 4.0. Slashdot's editors must have chosen to ignore the followup. There was another smaller one about an hour later. Yes, 4.0 is a small quake and I wasn't upset about it. Perhaps it would be interesting to note that quakes do follow each other in statistical groupings, so a small quake can indicate another following quake
Re: (Score:3)
An expression of caution following a quake "predicts" many more quakes than will really occur, as the probability is still less than 50%. Knowing of increased probability merely opens considerations of what to do during a "cautionary" period - minor adjustments such as lowering speed on the Transbay tunnel, or postponing crane lifts or tower climbs might be the kinds of things to do, but people may well tire of making these adjustments when nothing happens repeatedly. Bringing all life to a screaming halt o
Re: (Score:2)
This is a pretty rough crowd.
Best to always wear your helmet.
Re:A story for those who (Score:5, Informative)
A story for those who don't understand orders of magnitude?
As a former Californian, the magnitude scale goes something like this:
3.5 - Huh, what? When did that happen?
4.0 - Ehh, something moved slightly...
4.5 - Oh, I actually felt that one there.
5.0 - Heh, that actually qualifies as an earthquake.
5.5 - Oh boy, we are starting to shake pretty good. Stay away from the glass, this one might be a little rough.
6.0 - Find a doorway quick and hang on! This one will be rough.
6.5 - Oh crap, duck and cover! 20sec of destruction, 2 weeks of "The Big One is coming! Are you prepared? Will you die?!" news stories.
7.0 - Oh $h17!!! This one is going to hurt.
8.0 - Wait, what? You mean the Big One is real?
Scale +/-0.5 depending on where you are located in California (i.e. Bay area vs. Inland empire). A 4.0 ranks as barely noticable ...
Re: (Score:2)
I'm out of mod points else would definitely give you a +1 informative. And based on the map, I was about a 1/2 mile from the epicenter of this one and didn't feel it - but I think we were in the car coming from the latest Avengers movie so really paid no attention to it. Anything under a 5 is not worth talking about unless they are foreshocks.. .
Re: (Score:2)
It was barely noticeable - that's why I went to the USGS site to see what it was. Didn't know we had to edumacate Slashdot on the Richter/Mercalli scale, particularly the editors who choose what random notes to put on the front page. Still, a magnitude 4.0 is a release of more energy than a MOAB http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G... [wikipedia.org] , so I felt it even though 100km away. Those living in Concord would've felt a little more.
Re: (Score:2)
We get earthquakes like that all the time in New Zealand. Given that it was 14.6 km (9.0 miles) deep it probably would hardly even be felt unless you were nearly right on top of it. How they are felt depends very much on their depth. After the earthquakes of 2010 and 2011 that badly damaged Christchurch, we got www.geonet.org.nz that automatically reports on the location and magnitude of any earthquakes as well as how they are actually felt on the surface. Here's a 5.8 magnitude, 4km deep one from today, 3
Re: (Score:2)
My definition of 4.0: Who farted?
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly.
And a 4.0 is on the lowest end of that scale, almost 10x less powerful than a 4.9. There are over 13,000 4.0-4.9 magnitude earthquakes around the world each year. It's a non-story, except to ask your friend if he felt that. The commuter train passing by my office building causes that much shaking several times a day.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A story for those who don't understand orders of magnitude?
Seriously. I grew up in that area. One day I was standing on a stool that was unstable, it was missing a leg. A 4.0 earthquake hit about 10 miles away and I didn't even feel it on my precarious perch. I'm guessing whoever submitted this story is either not from California, or has never actually been in an earthquake before.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Even the arabs think the apocolypse will happen somwhere around sanfransico.
Which "Arabs" are those? Conservative Wahabbis and Salafis like the folks in ISIS/ISIL/whatever believe that the apocalypse will occur when the armies of "Rome" invade northern Syria (specifically, the town of Dabiq, which happens to be the name of the Islamic State's official magazine). The defeat of Rome will lead to a chain of events resulting in the final showdown with the anti-Messiah in Jerusalem.
But yeah, no one thinks the apocalypse will be near San Francisco.
Seriously, Why is this a Story? (Score:1)
A 4.0? That's just a little strong than a freight train going by.
Re: (Score:2)
Anything rare enough becomes a story.
The question is: Why is this a story posted on Slashdot? I might get it as a local story, if all they got during the last decade is less than a 3-pointer, but for Slashdot, there should be literally hundreds of such stories every day... would it publish them all?
Re: (Score:3)
Hey, it's not raining at my house. Moreover, we're going to have dinner in a little while.
Is Slashdot trying to out-twitter Twitter?
Re: (Score:2)
Is Slashdot trying to out-twitter Twitter?
I think so. I mean sure I could see a earthquake story if it hit Ontario or Quebec, part of central/northern Michigan or something. That's in/part of the Laurentian Plateau and doesn't get anymore stable, but California? Peh.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Slackware was published in Walnut Creek, California right next door to Concord. (I live in Concord, had a chance to visit Slackware HQ and never did)
I think after WC CDrom shut down Slackware moved to Concord.
That may be why it matters.
Also building code enforcement takes bribes so even a 4.0 might fuck some buildings up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine a line between Redding and Yuma. Anything that happens West of there is "news for nerds" according to Slashdot.
Now where's the weekly Australia story?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That was John Key, the Prime Minister of New Zealand. Australia is over 3 hours away by commercial jet plane.
Re: (Score:1)
I thought the cutoff was I-5
OMG 4.0!!!1 (Score:1)
Michigan had a bigger earthquake yesterday............. Since when is a 4.0 earthquake in CA news?
Re: (Score:2)
Since when did a tiny tremor like thiscoubt as news?
Seriously, a 4.0 does no damage, ithrt than maybe knocking a few things off a wallbor table. This is about as newsworthy as celebrity gossip or political promises.
I propose the ACUSGS. We can use ACs like seismographs. If you see one typing like this, then we can safely guess there was an earthquake or they had a bit too much to drink. :)
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, in California the only destructive effect of a 4.0 is to derail all conversation into everybody recounting the worst quake they've been through.
Re: (Score:2)
Let me fix that for you:
"Yeah, in California the only destructive effect of a 4.0 is to derail all conversation into everybody recounting the worst quake they've been through this week."
Hai Guyz (Score:5, Funny)
Hai guys I just saw a bird fly past my window at 2015-05-03 22:32:45 UTC, followed by a moth seven minutes later.
Re: (Score:3)
* Dissy has liked this post.
* Dissy retweets.
* Dissy has donated $5 to your kickstarter.
Re: (Score:1)
They want you to think it's a mere bird.
Most likely cause is: (Score:2)
Nestle fracking water out of the ground to put in plastic bottles.
Seriously? (Score:4, Insightful)
Michigan had a 4.2 earthquake over the weekend and all we posted were memes like http://i.imgur.com/bExOngH.png [imgur.com]. You'd think California of all places would be less surprised.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, nor is it news by any other standard
Re: (Score:2)
What the... (Score:3)
Jesus, timothy.
I just took a shit. It was kind of average as far as shits go. Maybe it's front-page material now though?
Re: (Score:1)
Some hell of a shit to cause a 4-quake. No more chili-burgers for you.
Must be a slow news day... (Score:2)
Could not feel it here in Concord (Score:1)
Me generation: Tech Bubble == Culture Bubble too. (Score:1)
BTW, there was a 4.9 in Tomioka, Japan too today.
(and a 5.2 in New Guniea, but does anyone near SF care? Mind that /.?)
Not news, especially in California (Score:2)
There was a 4.2 earthquake in western Michigan yesterday. An earthquake that size isn't news particularly in California. It was barely news in Michigan and they don't get earthquakes that size.
Just felt a small.. (Score:2)
Not news (Score:3, Informative)
Concord gets those all the time .... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Rain would be a far bigger story.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a story but not the Michigan earthquake? (Score:1)
Earthquakes around 4.0 or less happen all the time in California, you barely feel them. Less than 24 hours ago Michigan had its strongest earthquake since 1917. And this honestly what Slashdot thinks should be better story to comment on? and the Michigan earthquake is not? Really?
so? (Score:2)
There was a 4.2 near Portage, Michigan, where people are not used to earthquakes.
There were THREE earthquakes in New Hampshire in the last couple weeks, where people are also not used to earthquakes.
How is this news?
Another slow news day at Slashdot?
Get a grip, Timothy. NOT NEWS.
Instagram? (Score:2)
4.0? That's all? (Score:4, Interesting)
Pfffft! Michigan had a 4.2 yesterday. http://www.detroitnews.com/sto... [detroitnews.com]
Hoping for a Big One (Score:1)
And Northern California Yawns (Score:4, Informative)
3.6 here (Score:2)
I just had a 3.6 here [geonet.org.nz]. Should I submit a new story for it?
Re: (Score:2)
Snicker
Manufacturing news on a slow day.... (Score:2)
A movement of 4.2 used to be called a tremor, until news organizations such as CNN and the Weather Channel got a hold of them and became earthquakes. FLASH. BREAKING NEWS. CUE GRAPHICS. CUE JINGLE followed by 48 hrs of non stop coverage.
Before that at least one structure had to topple over for a tremor to be called an earthquake.
Oh shit (Score:4, Insightful)
I take it no one on Slashdot's esteemed editorial team has every lived in an earthquake area? As a former northern CA resident, I'm here to agree with the others that anything less than a 5.0 is not news. Seriously, if I felt a 4.0 at night, I probably wouldn't even mention it to friends the next day. If they're going to start posting about every 4.0 earthquake, I'll have to leave. There are a lot of those. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ear... [usgs.gov]
Meh! NZ had a 5.8 an hour ago ... (Score:2)
http://www.geonet.org.nz/ [geonet.org.nz]
You must be new to California. (Score:2)
No Big Deal (Score:1)
Kalamazoo, MI 4.2 Saturday (Score:1)
No news here. Move along. (Score:2)
Wanaka yesterday, had a Magnatude 6 earthquake. Chile regularly gets magnitude 7 and 8 quakes.
No news here. Move along.