Friendly Fungus Protects Our Mouths From Invaders 63
sciencehabit writes "When we talk about the human microbiome, bacteria usually get all the press. But microscopic fungi live in and on us, too. New research shows that a little-known fungus called Pichia lives in healthy mouths and may play an important role in protecting us from an infection caused by the harmful fungus Candida. The friendly fungus makes a substance that may even lead to a new anti-fungal drug."
Re:TMI (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes.
It's stuff that matters. In fact health matters a lot.
Re:Invented by homosexuals (Score:5, Informative)
In summary, you'd have to be some kind of idiot to think this is agenda-driven science.
Re: Invented by homosexuals (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah lets go sterilize everyone's mouth of the Pichia they've carried for generations of humans, so Candidas doesn't develop immunity to its byproducts.
Mod it down but Monsanto.... (Score:3)
...once the drug industry synthesizes the fungus Monsanto will kill off the moths.... and by out the rights holder.
Colony Life Forms (Score:5, Interesting)
We already knew ourselves to be essentially colony life forms riddled with remnant retroviruses and ancient symbionts such as mitochondria, but it's damn interesting to see just how deeply integrated we are into the extremely complex biosphere all around us. It's a little depressing, perhaps, but eventually the boffins will accumulate a body of knowledge that may finally sort out all the ridiculous little things that can and will go wrong with human bodies in the murk of general ignorance. Obesity, cancer and all manner of weird and supposedly unexplained ailments -- they could simply be unknown quirks of how our innumerable symbionts and parasites interact with our basic DNA programming. -_-
Mouthwash (Score:2, Interesting)
I wonder what effect if any mouthwash (with and without alcohol in it) has on this type of fungus.
There's a fungus among us (Score:2)
All eukaryotes are symbiotic systems. (Score:3, Informative)
For some of the bee colonies, the workers and the queen have genetic relatedness of 0.75, our body cells have r=1 between blood cells and gonads. Thus the insect colony is a looser agglomeration and our bodies are tighter agglomerations. Between parent and children the relatedness factor r=0.5, between cousins r= 0.125. uncles/aunts to nephews/nieces r= 0.25. In societies where first cousin marriage is encouraged, the general relatedness of the population could be much higher. Though it was not unknown in Europe (Einestein, Darwin married their first cousins) it is more common in the East. Even then most of them allow only children of a brother and sister to marry, not children of two brothers or children of two sisters. The only exception is the Ottoman empire which made marriage between children of brothers legal/halal/kosher. (Since Ottoman empire was Islamic many people confuse this practice with Islam. But in Muslim countries that were never ruled by the Ottomans this practice is very rare). Places that were once ruled by the Ottoman empire you could have whole villages or clans where all males have exactly the same y chromosome and have very high degree of relatedness. Such populations would pledge allegiance to the clan and take great personal sacrifices for the sake of their clans or tribes or villages or their shieks.
You could see the level of personal sacrifice made by individual animals or cells as a continuum plotted on genetic relatedness factor r. Our cells pledge very tight allegiance to the germline cells, ants/bees somewhat looser, human societies with very high relatedness have high patriotic feelings and personal sacrifices for the sake of community.
Trying to impose a western style democracy of a society with a mean value r on to other societies with an order of magnitude different r would not work easily. Giving autonomy and self governance for people/tribes/clans with high degree of relatedness, but subject to collective punishments and rewards would be considered sacrilege in the West. But such practices are more likely to succeed, pacify the population and lead to peace.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Places that were once ruled by the Ottoman empire you could have whole villages or clans where all males have exactly the same y chromosome and have very high degree of relatedness. Such populations would pledge allegiance to the clan and take great personal sacrifices for the sake of their clans or tribes or villages or their shieks.
Trying to impose a western style democracy of a society with a mean value r on to other societies with an order of magnitude different r would not work easily. Giving autonomy and self governance for people/tribes/clans with high degree of relatedness, but subject to collective punishments and rewards would be considered sacrilege in the West. But such practices are more likely to succeed, pacify the population and lead to peace.
There's an old Bedouin (who were part of the Ottoman empire for a while) saying: "I against my brother, my brothers and I against my cousins, then my cousins and I against strangers"
Tribalism/clannism doesn't bring peace, it just structures violence and corruption differently while removing many of the checks and balances.
Re: (Score:2)
Which isn't all bad... after all, the Bedouins didn't invent nuclear weapons.
Antiseptic Mouthwash Raises Heart Attack Risk (Score:5, Interesting)
Probiotics and alternative medicine people have said things like this for decades. Modern life, with antibiotics for non-life threatening illnesses, and things to kill bacteria at every turn, is one big living experiment. Little things that have big consequences that are really unknown:
Antiseptic Mouthwash Raises Heart Attack Risk
http://www.medicaldaily.com/an... [medicaldaily.com]
antibiotic soap (Score:5, Insightful)
Same goes for skin, as well. Wash your hands, but you don't have to "nuke bacteria from orbit." A lot of it is good for you and is there for a reason.
Scientists Discover That Antimicrobial Wipes and Soaps May Be Making You (and Society) Sick
http://blogs.scientificamerica... [scientificamerican.com]
Re: (Score:1)
What about antiseptics? I thought just alcohol and similar such germ killers (vs antibiotics), were the big breakthrough over a century ago in reducing all kinds of contact-borne infections that used to kill so many. Is there some optimal middle ground here?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Funny. Years ago I thought I remember research that said the reverse. Can't find it though - Google seems crappier nowadays (you just get zillions of hits for the 2014 item).
Even reduce premature births: http://www.dentistrytoday.com/... [dentistrytoday.com]
Generally periodontal disease seemed linked to higher heart disease: http://www.webmd.com/heart-dis... [webmd.com]
So maybe the particular mouthwash used was bad?
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Antiseptic Mouthwash Raises Heart Attack Risk (Score:5, Insightful)
You have to appreciate the irony that they find a new symbiotic fungus with clear health benefits and immediately try and use it to develop a novel way to kill fungus.
And the health benefit is that it puts out a substance that, err, umm, kills other fungus species, so "[killing] fungus" - or, to state it in a more accurate fashion, "killing other fungus species - is the clear health benefit.
So this is not any more ironic than, say, introducing a predatory mammal species to an ecosystem to cut down on the population of another mammal species.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, probiotics and alternative medicine people have said all kinds of ridiculous things for decades as well. I remember all too well the "ruby infused sun water" that was said to be a sure cure for my ear infections as a kid. That's just one of many similarly silly claims, as by recent protests against scam medical practices [randi.org] by actual doctors purposely trying to "overdose" on homeopathics...
The value isn't in having the "right answer" - it's in knowing which answers are are, in fact, right. "Alterna
Don't use mouthwash (Score:5, Interesting)
The dentist told me not to use mouthwash recently, and here's a good scientific reason apparently. I told them I used it about once a month but they said please use it only when we prescribe it to you.
I also learned you can mess with them by drinking red wine before going to the appointment, they're like "wtf is that on your tongue?".
Blown immune systems (Score:2, Informative)
This discovery could prove marvelous for people whose cancer treatments means their immune system has been blown away. Antibiotics to treat their infections often destroy friendly flora, resulting in runaway Candida infections. Using a friendly fungus to fight an destructive one could make a big difference.
In other news (Score:3, Funny)
Old egg salad sandwiches make you super intelligent and strong as an ox.
As someone currently dealing with athlete's foot.. (Score:2)
All fungi can fuck off. Seriously.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:As someone currently dealing with athlete's foo (Score:4, Interesting)
Terbinafine (Lamisil) is the most effective compound against that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... [wikipedia.org]
1 week of exposure is enough to eradicate all traces of the fungi that cause athlete's foot. Lamisil Once is very effective if you're lazy or forgetful.
If you prefer 'natural' methods, you can apply (or soak in) a sufficiently acidic solution of citric acid or vinegar for two weeks. Skip a day and the two-week counter resets, as the method relies on the fungi not reproducing until they all die naturally. The same goes for most anti-fungal treatments, by the way (which is why Lamisil Once is so effective).
While we're on the subject of fungi: dandruff is often caused by the fungus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M... [wikipedia.org] (globosa), which feeds on the lipids on your scalp.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z... [wikipedia.org] is quite effective in dealing with the fuckers, without requiring a prescription from your doctor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My allergist isn't a big fan of zinc pyrithione.
Because? I'm genuinely interested.
Selenium sulfide shampoos [...] have worked far better for my seborrheic dermatitis of the scalp
Mm, I had not yet encountered that one. After a bit of googling, I found this good overview: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm... [nih.gov] (the substance specific appreciation is at the end).
Hmmm (Score:1)
The friendly fungus makes a substance that may even lead to a new anti-fungal drug."
Leading to overuse, abuse and a reduction in effectiveness, I also wonder how much mouthwash really helps over the long term as some bacteria adapts to the conditions and these "friendly fungi" may not.
fido already knew (Score:2)
Re:fido already knew (Score:4, Informative)
We already knew why people/dogs do that: saliva contains blood clotting agents [nih.gov].
Develop a simple test for this fungus (Score:2)
A movie? (Score:2)
...a little-known fungus called Pichia lives in healthy mouths and may play an important role in protecting us from an infection caused by the harmful fungus Candida.
I really can't help it but when I read this, it sounded to me like someone is already writing a script for the next Hollywood summer action blockbuster. :-)
And the long term consequences? (Score:2)
Sometimes I'm grateful that I probably won't be around to see the worst consequences of our foolish use of technology!
Re: (Score:2)
Candidas is regularly exposed to "this chemical" everyday and has been for thousands of years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course.
Books (Score:2)
What does this have to do with the books I had at school?
http://www.candida.co.nz/ [candida.co.nz]
Re: (Score:1)
Pichia... but what Pichia (Score:1)