Chinese Moon Rover Says an Early Goodnight 284
hackingbear writes "The Chinese moon rover, Jade Rabbit, encountered an abnormality in its control mechanism before its planned sleep during the 14-day-long lunar night. In the form of a diary, the Jade Rabbit said, "The shi-fu ('kung-fu masters,' meaning the scientists and engineers) are working around the clock trying to fix the problem and their eyes look like a rabbit's (red due to fatigue), but I may not be able to survive over this lunar night." (translated, original in Chinese.) The rover landed on the moon on Dec 14 and was designed to operate for three months."
Meanwhile, back in America (Score:4, Insightful)
Ours just keep going and going... [xkcd.com] like the Energizer bunny.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
So? What's going to get damaged, exactly speaking?
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:4, Interesting)
It's entering its second lunar night - it landed on the Moon on December 14th.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Informative)
TFS said it landed on Dec 14th. Assuming it landed at dawn, sunset would have been about the 28th and the sun would have returned about the 11th with its second night starting about the 24th. Since this is the 25th, my numbers are probably slightly off but either way this has to be the second night and it did survive the first night. Not bad for a first attempt, took a few tries for the Americans and Soviets to successfully soft land on the Moon.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Funny)
Damn those Pesky Facts!
Brief translation from Chinese (Score:5, Informative)
Mars doesn't have 2 week long nights without an atmosphere. The Mars rovers get a nice helping of solar power each 24 hr period. If there is a software glitch, you can just fix it the next day. That doesn't work on the Moon.
Greetings, everyone ! Today is the 42th earth day since I've arrived on the moon. I have several good news and one bad news. Which one do you like to hear first ?
The first good news is that after the 42 days of endeavor I've travelled more than 100 meters. the scientific equipment that I've brought with me - the radar, the panaromic camera, the x-ray scanner, the infra-red scanner, and so on, - have gathered a lot of useful data.
The second good news is that at dawn time 2 days ago I communicated directly with Ms. Chang'e 3, who is some 20 meters away from me, using the UHF antenna for the first time, without the aid of the "Shi Fu". Although Ms. Chang'e 3 couldn't reply to my message, but I know she would be extremely happy to receive my "love letter". As this was a private message between me and Ms. Chang'e 3, hope that you guys can give us some privacy ...
The third good news is Ms. Chang'e 3 already went to bed early morning yesterday, preparing for the arrival of 2nd lunar night.
Now, the bad news.
I should have gone to bed this morning, but before I went to bed, the "Shi Fu" discovered some abnormalies within my control mechanism, resulting in part of my body isn't responding to command. Right now the "Shi Fu" are cracking their heads to solve this problem, even to the stage of forgoing their beauty nap. Rumor has it that their eyes look more and more like the ones on rabbits.
Even though with the intervention of the "Shi Fu", I understand that there is a distinct possibility that I may not survive this lunar night....
....
Good night, Earth ! Good night, Earthlings !!
Re:Brief translation from Chinese (Score:5, Funny)
I guess cheap knock offs don't work well on the moon either.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Japanese tech is the high-priced stuff these days.
Because it kicks butt?
Because they don't do cheap junk anymore. That's what China is for, these days.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Is it normal in china to write news about a rover as if the rover was writing it?
Re:Brief translation from Chinese (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Brief translation from Chinese (Score:5, Interesting)
Since this is their first lunar rover, there's no precedent either way. However it is normal for Chinese to speak of themselves in 3rd-pers in some situations. This is due to their emphasis on titles instead of names. For example, a parent might say, "Daddy wants you to brush your teeth," instead of "I want you to..." This general pattern is used whenever there is a title of some sort, such as boss, uncle, doctor, mayor, etc..
That said, I have no idea whether the GP's translation is authentic. I haven't been following this news in the Chinese press. It's a bit over the top, but I wouldn't put it past them, especially as a tactic to engage children with STEM education. It strikes me as the sort of thing Western broadcasters do at Christmas, showing "Santa's sleigh" on the weather radar.
Re: (Score:2)
Silly Rabbit should have clicked on TFA... ;-)
Yes, the GP's translation is authentic.
Re:Brief translation from Chinese (Score:5, Insightful)
No idea, but probes from other [twitter.com] places [twitter.com] have a peculiar tendency to write about themselves too.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Do we have any Mars rovers close enough to the poles to not get sunlight in winter? I don't think so, which means they all get at least some sunlight in every 25 hour day, unless dust storms blot out the sun. Considering that they're basically in a cheap vacuum thermos it shouldn't take much in the way of a low-wattage heater to keep them warm. Lunar rovers get an even better thermos bottle effect, but those 709-hours days make for some long, cold nights.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:4, Interesting)
The non-roving Phoenix [wikipedia.org] Mars probe landed sufficiently far north that reduced sunlight due to an approaching winter caused its (expected) failure. It most likely got buried by carbon dioxide ice later on anyway - orbital photos showed its solar panels got crushed...
For keeping space probes warm, radioisotope heater units [wikipedia.org] are pretty common. Apparently the Chinese Moon rover has them - but it sounds like it hasn't successfully closed itself up in order to keep heat inside.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention the occasional dust-devil to clean the solar panels.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Insightful)
If their fault turns out to be more serious, or their system lacks the failsafe systems that would allow recovery from a modestly serious bug, then some snarking may be in order; but they are still within the 'scrambling for a fix' window.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Informative)
I don't know why the Chinese decided to go solar, possibly weight, possibly difficulty in sourcing RTG fuel; but certainly neither the US nor the Russians have been squeamish about nuclear power in space when the mission called for it.
more nukes now (Score:5, Interesting)
I hope this ends soon. Robert Oppenheimer and others proposed a central global authority to control the world's plutonium. Since we know we only have so much left, each interested country could take part in a new organization that starts from scratch with no historical precedents hanging over it and use the plutonium only for space exploration.
Each country could & would want to contribute because everyone wants to get back into space & nuclear power helps alot.
In general I think nuclear power's time has come. You can list all the dangers but we have the same vulnerability with anything. Just look at the recent rail cars carrying oil products that crashed and burned in Canada almost destroying a whole town & killing 30+ people.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is cost. Governments are increasingly unwilling to fund nuclear and it isn't economically viable without heavy subsidy. For example in the UK the government has to provide insurance since no commercial insurer would even consider it, and guarantee very high wholesale prices for the electricity generated.
There are too many competitive alternatives now. The only reason we are having more nuclear is because it makes friends of the politicians in power richer and helps meet our environmental targets
Re:more nukes now (Score:4, Interesting)
The problem is cost.
The problem is IMPOSED cost. We IMPOSE cost on nuclear because, despite it's amazing track record of safety normalized for Terawatt-hours produced, the one accident where fewer than 70 people actually died from the radiation (despite the fact that its primary purpose was for enriching weapons grade nuclear material, not energy and had third-world safety controls) was heavily publicized. 70 people fall of their roofs in different parts of the world for a trickle of solar power and it is as "statistic." 70 people die from radiation for the oceans of energy nuclear has produced, and it is a "disaster."
in the UK the government has to provide insurance since no commercial insurer would even consider it.
Insurance companies profit by dispersing the risk of low-frequency-high-cost events over multiple parties. For any given event, the frequency multiplied by the cost of the event must be less than the premium. Nuclear meets this requirement! But there is a second requirement called "ruin capacity" that derives from a statistical nicety in the central limit theorem: The cost of a single event must be much lower than the operating cost of the risk-aggregating party, so that the off-chance of a single event wouldn't put the company at risk of going out of business.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R... [wikipedia.org]
This is not true for any single insurer in the UK, but it is true for the government. Thus, an insurer could not profit from a nuclear power plant, but the government could.
There are too many competitive alternatives now.
There are no alternatives that are as safe and reliable as nuclear power. Fossil fuels? Not nearly as safe as nuclear. Hydro? Not nearly as safe as nuclear. Wind/Solar? Not reliable enough to generate base load electricity without energy storage. Energy storage? Not even close to becoming economically viable yet. Germany is the closest any major power has come to ditching fossil fuels for renewables, with a whopping 25% reduction in fossil fuel dependency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R... [wikipedia.org]
But renewables can't produce energy on-demand without expensive energy storage mechanisms. So Germany can't actually CONSUME that energy without the help of rate agreements from their nuclear-producing neighbors like France.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... [wikipedia.org]
France, by contrast, ditched fossil fuels for a primarily nuclear-based strategy a long time ago. The result? 90+% reduction in fossil fuel usage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... [wikipedia.org]
By all measures, nuclear is winning.
because the extremely powerful newspapers hate all the alternatives.
[Citation needed]
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is IMPOSED cost. We IMPOSE cost on nuclear because, despite it's amazing track record of safety normalized for Terawatt-hours produced
That's now how insurance works. They look at the potential risk, and as Fukushima demonstrated that potential (in monetary terms) is rather high. Sorry, but if you irradiate someone's property and make it worthless, or destroy their business and livelihood, you have to compensate them. That's not an imposed cost, that's how society works. You can't externalize the cost of an accident by saying "too bad".
Ruin theory doesn't really apply here. It is based on the potential for a large number of accidents to ca
Re: (Score:2)
That was right after it drilled into a pyramid shaped rock. I wonder if China messed with a pyramid or obelisk also.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Funny)
From that came one of the greatest Biblical space jokes ever: "The Spirit is willing but the flash it weak".
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Funny)
From that came one of the greatest Biblical space jokes ever: "The Spirit is willing but the flash it weak".
Must be really something to fight its way to the upper echelons of great bible space jokes.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Ours just keep going and going... [xkcd.com] like the Energizer bunny.
Hopefully, that little guy will get to come home one day.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5)
For some reason, that XKCD always makes me sad.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember watching a documentary about the rover years ago. The lead scientist, Squires (sp?), talked about how if the launch was successful, he would never see the rovers again. Bittersweet to think about sinking years of effort into designing and fabricating something and then hoping you would never get to touch or set eyes on it again.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Insightful)
Many of you feel bad for this rover (Score:2)
Insight from Spike Jonze and Ikea (SFW, 1:01 minutes) [youtube.com]
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:4, Interesting)
Sure... except we had our shares of total or partial failures in our unmanned space program too. The first *six* lunar probes in the 1960's Ranger program failed. We lost Mariners 3 and 8 and Mars Observer. Oh, and we cocked up Hubble's primary mirror because somebody installed a test jig backward, which shows how big missions depend on countless small things to go right.
Anyhow it's too early to count Jade Rabbit out. Glitches are a fairly regular feature of space missions, if you follow them. It's still quite possible they'll fiddle the thing back into operation.
Re: (Score:3)
The first *six* lunar probes in the 1960's Ranger program failed. We lost Mariners 3 and 8 and Mars Observer.
I don't think this is quite fair. Technology in the 1960s was downright primitive; that was a time when computers took up whole rooms, and car engines had their fuel metered by Rube Goldbergesque all-mechanical contraptions rather than electronic control systems. Space exploration was brand-new. It's not too surprising that a bunch of late 50s/early 60s-tech space probes crapped out; it was amazi
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure yours stopped working about 40 years ago.
What are you talking about? The US has never had an autonomous rover on the Moon.
Re:Meanwhile, back in America (Score:5, Insightful)
Have too! Several in fact. The first two were named Neil and Buzz. Autonomous as all hell...
Made in China (Score:4, Funny)
They just don't make rovers like they use to
Re: (Score:2)
Made in China, means that it will fail prematurely, if not, it will explode, poison or kill someone in the process.
If it manages to poison or kill someone from the moon, I'll be impressed.
Anyone know how to say "I surrender" in Mandarin?
Good luck (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know. Something like this supersede geopolitics, nationalism, etc., at least for now.
Good luck, Chinese comrades.
Re:Good luck (Score:5, Insightful)
I think I agree with this. If the big picture is having humans become space faring (in a meaningful way; not just doing a handfull of short visits to a nearby lifeless rock), then having the Chinese be successful at their space endeavours should be as important to us as it is to them. In the big picture, we are all human, and if the Chinese are successful of conquering space (in a way that the US, Russia, Europe, etc., haven't been able to do), then we all win. Also, if they fail, then so too do we.
Gook luck, Chinese comrades indeed.
Re: (Score:3)
I know an awful lot of Americans who see everything through those same eyes.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd like to believe that if we were attacked by aliens all the people of Earth would put aside our petty differences, rally together, and be on the same side for once.
Of course I'd like to believe we would do that anyway, but I really think it would take an alien invasion to make it happen. *sigh*
Re: (Score:2)
>and be on the same side for once.
Would that side happen to be as appetizers with a little lemon juice for flavor? If an alien race capable of traveling between stars ever attacks Earth, our technology will be so badly outclassed that we won't stand a chance.
Native peoples of the New World rallying together (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Enought with the nationalist crap (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
What could Jade Rabbit teach us that wasn't already learned by Kim Jung Il during his trip to the moon?
Re: (Score:3)
What could Jade Rabbit teach us that wasn't already learned by Kim Jung Il during his trip to the moon?
How we can keep him there next time!
Re:Enought with the nationalist crap (Score:5, Informative)
Just as an FYI because you may appreciate knowing, it's actually "hear hear." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H... [wikipedia.org]
Re:Enought with the nationalist crap (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe we should just use "hear here", just to cover all of our bases. That's what I do, anyway.
Re:Enought with the nationalist crap (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe we should just use "hear here", just to cover all of our bases.
Their, there, now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Enought with the nationalist crap (Score:5, Informative)
it was a visual inspection, in situ, of Lunar regolith that added weight to the theory of Lunar origin being a result of an impact event on Earth.
How does this benefit all of humanity? Well, it adds credibility to the many and repeated proposals to exploit the Lunar surface for mineral resources which are demonstrably similar to the proportions found here on Earth, with obvious exceptions being fossil fuels. There is a wealth undreamed of, of such elements as gold, silver, uranium, thorium, lithium, platinum, silicon, lead, even the much lighter and exotic elements such as helium-3 (which alone occurs in quantities enough to solve the energy demand until the sun dies), just waiting for Humanity to quit with the fighting over specific claims over resources on this planet. When (if) that ever comes to pass, then we will be one step closer to expanding our influence for good or bad across the rest of the Solar system.
Re: (Score:2)
It's Lunar regolith, bedrock that has been repeatably crushed and stirred up and never having had water to concentrate elements as on the Earth (and perhaps Mars) and the Helium 3 is so thinly dispersed (0.01 ppm to 0.05 ppm) on the surface that it would be easier to mine it from Saturns atmosphere or synthesize it here. There are probably concentrated deposits of iron and such from meteor impacts but other then that most lunar mining is going to be hard to do profitably.
BTW, the Moon does not have the same
Re: (Score:2)
That wasn't his point at all, as I hope you know. He was describing how it helped us project the specific mineral makeup of the moon, which, though falling on the same periodic table, does not necessarily have to be the same as that of the earth.
Re:Enough with the ad hominem crap (Score:3)
I don't usually respond to ACs, but you take the biscuit of one who completely fucking misses the point of the parent post.
I didn't mention anything about manifest destiny, you did. What I was alluding to was the fact that the similarities between Lunar samples and Terran samples was essentially the same, implying that they originated from the same place.
To piss all over your claim, there is no trace of heavy elements in the Sun - the heaviest element so far detected in the solar spectrum has been oxygen, t
Re: (Score:2)
Of course there are traces of heavy elements in the Sun, it was formed from the same nebula as the Earth which had been enriched by supernovas. Wiki says that 1.69% (5,600 times the Earths mass) of the Sun is heavier elements including 0.2% iron. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S... [wikipedia.org]
Re:Enought with the nationalist crap (Score:4, Insightful)
I do hope they resolve it (Score:5, Insightful)
I do hope they resolve the problem and keep going. It would be such an embarassment to China to have it fail on it's first night out.
You can make all the jokes you want about "Cheap Chinese Crap" you want, but you know as well as I do that when it comes to stuff that isn't intended for the dollar store sale bins, China can make as good a piece of hardware as anyone else. They wouldn't have made it to the moon in the first place if their rocket had been built with toy-maker electronics instead of mil-spec.
Re: (Score:3)
I do hope they resolve the problem and keep going. It would be such an embarassment to China to have it fail on it's first night out.
You can make all the jokes you want about "Cheap Chinese Crap" you want, but you know as well as I do that when it comes to stuff that isn't intended for the dollar store sale bins, China can make as good a piece of hardware as anyone else. They wouldn't have made it to the moon in the first place if their rocket had been built with toy-maker electronics instead of mil-spec.
Or if they hadn't raided the US aerospace industry with APTs.
Re: (Score:2)
Except they get their tech from the Russians (while we still are scrounging around with the stuff we stole from the Germans after WWII).
Re: (Score:2)
Except they get their tech from the Russians (while we still are scrounging around with the stuff we stole from the Germans after WWII).
Uh huh. And just where do you think the Russians got their tech from?
Shi-fu doesn't equal 'Kung-Fu Master' (Score:5, Informative)
Shi-fu/Sifu is not a term specific to a 'kung-fu master'. It is refers to someone who is skilled in a profession or of high experience. Likewise, in Japanese the term 'sensi' doesn't equate to a 'karate master', it too is used to refer to someone skilled or experienced, such as a doctor, teacher, or even mentor.
Kung-fu? (Score:2)
> The shi-fu ('kung-fu masters,' meaning the scientists and engineers)
According to Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], shifu means master craftsman [wikipedia.org]. Though that obviously also covers kung-fu masters, I don't think that is what the Chinese were alluding to!
I think somebody has been watching too many Hong Kong kung-fu movies.
Re: (Score:2)
"Shi-fu" are what Kung-fu black-belts are called. Similar to "sensei" for karate, I think. I don't think the use of 'shi-fu' was incorrect or un-intended; it's what they meant to say.
Only one page of comments (Score:3, Interesting)
and already this USA #1-bullshit. Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world, and there is nothing made in the USA today which does not build upon and directly involve talent from all over the world. You are not entitled.
The Chinese have made the whole world proud with this achievement, and you should not let your envy and superiority complex get the better of you.
Re:Only one page of comments (Score:5, Interesting)
This is a really weird feeling. I'm 90% sure you're a Chinese propagandist, but I 100% agree with your words.
I don't because he's a fucking moron (Score:5, Insightful)
I mean let's see what's in the thread right now: An energizer bunny joke about the US mars rovers, someone saying good luck to the Chinese and how this transcends politics, someone saying Jade Rabbit is awesome, someone who hopes they resolve the problem, someone correcting the use of shi-fu, and then this.
So basically, he's making shit up. The higher rated comments are nearly all encouragement, and the one referencing the US rovers is a joke. This moron wants there to be a bunch of US nationalism for him to hate on, but there's not, so he just pretends like there is anyhow. He's making up reasons for US hate/China strong.
Also there's the stupid crap of trying to make the US look bad because "Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world." As though the US is so stupid and has to import foreigners to do any work. No, quite the opposite actually: American universities are still some of the very best research institutions in the world, despite all the cuts and problems, and people come from around the world to work at them and do research. The US is a melting pot precisely because of the excellence of its research institutions, and in allowing people from all over to come, it helps to continue that excellence and enrich the world's knowledge.
The grandparent is just a jackass. He really wants this to be some kind of China hate thread so he can hate on that to try and deflect things from the rover's problem. Instead it is a thread largely of people saying "Good luck China, we hope you fix the problem and your rover continues to work."
Welcome to the Internet, Population: Unrestrained (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What's great about the US is that we welcome people from all countries and backgrounds. We should be proud of our multi-culturalism unlike the exclusionary Chinese pride that everything can be done by the Chinese.
We're proud of our pragmatism and pointing out the failures of blind nationalism trumping all else. The Mars Rover was first and foremost a nationalist chest bumping to prop up a political regime--and a scientific mission second. That's not unlike the cold war but at least in the cold war we we
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Only one page of comments (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Yes, but other than movable type printing, a calendar that was as accurate as the Gregorian but developed hundreds of years earlier, percussive cap drilling that was capable of the deepest wells in the early 19th century, paper currency, watertight compartments partitioning ships, dental fillings, dominoes, clockwork escapements, forensic entomology, multi-stage rocketry, pontoon bridges, toilet paper, electronic cigarettes, non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for Down's Syndrome, synthesis of crystall
Re: (Score:2)
Good Luck (Score:5, Insightful)
With the recent successes of the Mars rovers it's hard to remember that conditions in space are a super difficult thing to deal with. It's a huge feat all by itself to land on the moon with a functioning rover at all, as China did... so if this rover falters hopefully they'll learn from it and build another.
Better still it wakes up again and keeps going for them.
Good Luck China!
3 month warranty! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Yea, just return it in original packaging for a full replacement.
I hope they kept the receipt!
Re: (Score:2)
just like on ebay, getting the thing to you is cheap; but if you have to return it, OH BOY are you in for a shock of a shipping charge.
It''s a shame (Score:2)
Those kids that they had build that will be so disappointed. Might have to go back to building iphones.
Re: (Score:2)
I know it's wrong but I laughed anyway. No mod points so I can't help you with the guys who are too PC to appreciate a tasteless joke.
The song? (Score:2)
Didn't Audrey Hepburn in "Breakfast at Tiffany's" sing a song called "Moon Rover"?
That's the first thought I had when I saw this topic.
Lasted longer than than appliences I buy nowadays (Score:2)
Lasted longer than than the US brand name appliances I buy nowadays...
Re: (Score:2)
What is that, neocon word salad?
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's Mxedruli forcefed through Bing Translate...
Re: (Score:2)
almost, I checked - it's Peter Lilley's secretary's notes on climate change
Re:(insert bad lip sync here) (Score:5, Informative)
Rover talk like Kung-Fu Panda's dad
Only because of the bad translation. For instance, although "shi fu" can mean "kung fu master", it can also mean any master or expert, and that is clearly what it means in this context. Note to Slashdot editors: Next time, instead of using cut-and-paste from Google translate, find someone that actually understands the language.
Re:(insert bad lip sync here) (Score:5, Informative)
Rover talk like Kung-Fu Panda's dad
Only because of the bad translation. For instance, although "shi fu" can mean "kung fu master", it can also mean any master or expert, and that is clearly what it means in this context. Note to Slashdot editors: Next time, instead of using cut-and-paste from Google translate, find someone that actually understands the language.
Remember all the jokes about the silly English translations you see when traveling in China? Well, that's because when China was poor, they have to do the translation to satisfy English visitors. So it was *always* some Chinese's fault when Google Translate gave something stupid.
Now that China got richer, well, we started to see cases when the table was turned, we see translation errors just as silly. Only now, in these cases, you cannot point at some Chinese and laugh at how stupid they were.
And, yes, "shi fu" is a general term of "master" of any kind. English natives like Americans usually take it to mean "kung fu master" because that's the only kind of master from China that they can see on TV shows and movies. "Shi fu" is commonly used as a respectful title for referring and addressing to technical workers, including plumbers, electrician, drivers, and of course, programmers and other high-tech workers. Such as asking a plumber: "Shi fu, can this be fixed? how much would this cost?" Nobody in China would automatically take "Shi fu" to mean "Kung fu master", unless you are already in a kung fu school.
Re: (Score:2)
And, yes, "shi fu" is a general term of "master" of any kind. English natives like Americans usually take it to mean "kung fu master"
Actually most Americans think "shi fu" is a gray coated Red Panda. That also happens to be a Kung Fu master.
Re: (Score:2)
Note to Chinese Rovers: Next time, find a better language.
Re: Figures (Score:4, Funny)
I'm curious what made in USA piece of electronics you're using to write that comment ...
How about a Lenovo on its 3rd motherboard?
Re: (Score:2)
Yutu's failure might help calm the Chinese government's ego for a short while. China's regime scares the hell out of me.
And the one in the US doesn't?
Re: (Score:3)
China's regime doesn't scare me although I feel sad for those who suffer under it. The bad direction my own government is headed in worries me far more. I'm not under China's domain but the idiots in D.C. who are dismantling the Constitution because they're worried about some terrorists are a threat to my future freedom. While it's hardly at Tiananmen Square leve,l I resent every step in that direction. Trading liberty for security is a shitty bargain in my view.
Re:USA Media sucks (Score:4, Informative)
What newspaper do you read?
If by "US media", you are talking only about television, then I have to agree.
The only time I watch news on TV is when I'm on the treadmill at the gym. I assure you that CNN had noted the Jade Rabbit mission before the launch, during the launch, and after the landing. Nothing in-depth, but what can you say about the mission anyway?
Here's some links (below) from the Atlanta Journal. I think they did a decent job of reporting on it. It's similar to the coverage in most mainstream newspapers.
http://www.accessatlanta.com/v... [accessatlanta.com]
http://www.ajc.com/videos/news... [ajc.com]
http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/inter... [ajc.com]
http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/top-n... [ajc.com]
http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/top-n... [ajc.com]
http://www.accessatlanta.com/v... [accessatlanta.com]
http://www.accessatlanta.com/v... [accessatlanta.com]
http://www.ajc.com/videos/news... [ajc.com]
Posted on wrong article (Score:2)