Green Meteorite Found In Morocco May Be From Mercury 89
An anonymous reader writes in with news that a meteorite found in Morocco might be from Mercury. "The green rock found in Morocco last year may be the first known visitor from the solar system's innermost planet, according to meteorite scientist Anthony Irving, who unveiled the new findings this month at the 44th annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas. The study suggests that a space rock called NWA 7325 came from Mercury, and not an asteroid or Mars."
Don't tell Superman (Score:2, Funny)
Obviously it's Kryptonite
With a name like NWA 7325... (Score:5, Funny)
I'd guess it was "Straight Outta Compton"
Re: (Score:3)
I'd guess it was "Straight Outta Compton"
or "Straight Outta Krypton", in this case.
Oh, wait, that was Addis Ababa, not Morocco.
Re: (Score:2)
dammit, you beat me.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Green Meteorite Found In Morocco May Be From M (Score:1)
It's an Easter present. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Would an omnipotent being have or need boogers?
Re:It's an Easter present. (Score:5, Informative)
A fan of H2G2 you are not.
Creator of the universe as claimed by adherents of the faith on planet Viltvodle VI. Their legend has it that the universe was sneezed out of the nose of the Great Green Arkleseizure, and they thus live in perpetual fear of the time they call "The Coming of the Great White Handkerchief."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
"Need"? Who doesn't need a green radioactive space booger.
If I was an omnipotent deity, radioactive space boogers would be like the first thing on my list.
What do you think caused the extinction of the dinosaurs for chrissake?
Re: (Score:3)
*that* was Baldrick's underwear.
Don't you keep up with BBC News?
Dumb Question: (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Dumb Question: (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
A rock which melts during atmospheric entry likely has its magnetism all messed up because of the high temperatures. Or maybe my physics knowledge is abysmal?
Re:Dumb Question: (Score:4, Informative)
Only the surface heats up during the short trip through the atmosphere with the inside still being very cold.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the info. Now I'm a bit less stupid :)
Re: (Score:1)
OK... so the rock is anemic... I suggest a little folic acid
Re:Dumb Question: (Score:4, Funny)
We just compare with the samples we've already taken from Mercury, Duh!
Re: (Score:2)
We just compare with the samples we've already taken from Mercury, Duh!
Those non-existent ones you mean? We have not retreived any samples from Mercury.
Re: (Score:2)
Careful, that whoooosh was actually an asteroid... maybe from Mercury.
Re: (Score:2)
Parties where they discuss meteorites? Be a shame if aristotle-dude brought THAT party down a peg on the fun-meter.
Re: (Score:2)
we got plenty of samples from freddie.. he was a real star!
Re: (Score:2)
two main methods: magnetic properties, and chemical composition.
For instance, we know that rocks have fallen to Earth from Lunar impacts, but we didn't know until Apollo returned with samples, exactly what we were looking at. Turns out that Lunar rock is pretty much identical to Terran rock, with some minor differences in magnetic striation (the Moon doesn't have a magnetic field so rocks formed after the formation of the Moon, and lava fields in particular, have no discernible magnetic field, however a clu
Re: (Score:1)
You and me, both. I reckon this mostly amounts to sensationalistic crap. The guess is they're 4.5 billion years old.
In theory, that's about how old the earth is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_evolutionary_history_of_life [wikipedia.org]
which is also about the age of Mercury.
So the meteorite is about the age of the planets.
Who the hell knows where it's really from? What does origination mean if there weren't distinct planets, yet? What the hell do we know about material that old - how much of it have we studied
Smart question, actually. (Score:4, Interesting)
Well, there's only one way, really. You go to that planet or moon, pick up a rock, and bring it home. We can prove beyond a doubt that the moon rocks the astronauts brought home did, in fact, come from Earth's moon. At least, that's where they most recently came from before coming to Earth.
However, in "Science Journalism" which is something loosely inspired by sloppy research and egregious overstatements made by scientists while pumping for grants and attention, if a rock has characteristics that resemble the characteristics of rocks found on some other planet or moon, we confidently state that it came from there. It's called "leaping to conclusions", and misrepresenting hypotheses in this way is a big industry that forms the basis of Science Journalism.
Take the Big Bang theory for an example. We have a working theory, based on a real observation (that all matter we can detect appears to be expanding outwards from a point) and nobody has come up with a better explanation (yet) so in the world of Science Journalism it's an incontrovertible fact that all matter was once contained in a single point. See how that works? You just jump straight from "this is an idea that represents a possibility, which we can work with" to "this is absolute truth that only heretics and savages don't worship".
It's this kind of abandonment of logic and reason, and the substitution of pseudo-scientific dogma for true skepticism or conditional belief, that allows stuff like global warming denialism to prosper. You deflect the conversation from what's reasonable and logically provable to a discussion of the relative stature of the priests, er, I meant scientists, and their religious, er, I meant political affiliations. Evidence be damned, I have magazines.
Re: (Score:2)
Your brilliant explanation of the shortcomings of my brief gloss on modern cosmology fills me with admiration. Your fantastic powers of critical exposition must be admired by all your cowardly peers! Surely nothing further need ever be written in English, since your terse yet fantastically informative post has forever exhausted the possibilities of that language.
Re: (Score:1)
The title of the article indicates that the rock might be from mercury, so there is no one claiming to have proved it's origin. However, there is the possibility of being pretty certain. (the main question being how did it get from Mercury to Earth?)
Spectroscopy lets us know what Mercury is made of and comparing this rock to what we know of mercury will allow scientists to determine the likelihood of a rock coming from that planet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy/ [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Science is not about proving things beyond a doubt, only ruling out possibilities and discussing the most likely candidates, reaching a consensus until new evidence is found.
Mercury is not green, so how did (Score:1)
it get green? Left in the fridge too long?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the rock oxidized once in our atmosphere and thus changed color?
Mercurous Chromate is green (Score:4, Funny)
Apparently there are very few green-colored mercury compounds*; most of them tend to be reddish or white. So if the mercury you left in the fridge is turning green, because you've got a bunch of chromate ions floating around inside, you've got at least two problems in your fridge... and you don't usually see that kind of behaviour in a major appliance.
(* That's based on Google/Wikipedia searches; it's been a while since I've done real chemistry, and it's possible there's also some green organometallic mercury compound, but most of the ones I could find were reds or whites. It's also possible that you've got some mercury-tolerant molds growing on the organic debris floating on top of your bowl of mercury, but I'm still not gonna eat anything from your fridge.)
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, are we talking about the planet or the element now?
ObTOS (Score:4, Funny)
"It's life, Jim, but not as we know it."
"Green life? Ok, Bones, leave the ... diplomacy to me!"
Re:ObTNG (Score:2)
"Ugly bag of mostly water"
Analyzed by Scotty (Score:2)
"It's ... it's green."
Re:Another dumb question.... (Score:5, Insightful)
The tricky part of this scenario is getting the rock enough kinetic energy to boost it from Mercury's orbit out to Earth. I'd guess a slingshot around the sun was probably needed.
Re:Another dumb question.... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'd guess a slingshot around the sun was probably needed.
It's got to be something massive moving relative to the Sun, probably Mercury and/or Venus.
Re: (Score:2)
The tricky part of this scenario is getting the rock enough kinetic energy to boost it from Mercury's orbit out to Earth. I'd guess a slingshot around the sun was probably needed.
How does something slingshot around the sun? I am aware of planetary slingshots, but they depend upon the planet's orbital speed around the sun. I could see how the sun will change the direction of the object, but not how it could impart more kinetic energy to the object.
Re:Another dumb question.... (Score:4, Informative)
any high speed impact in which the ejecta achieves escape velocity. Fairly easy to do, if you have either a large enough impactor or one moving fast enough (28,000mph is fairly slow yet fast enough to achieve escape velocity even in Earth's gravity influence).
BTW, there are other bodies in the solar system, other than Earth, with active volcanoes. Two examples: Venus and Io. In fact, Io is the most geologically active body in the entire solar system, due solely to its proximity to Jupiter and the fact that there is a thirty Terawatt polar torus connecting the two. Io's volcanoes regularly throw debris into orbit.
Re: (Score:3)
The most likely scenario is that an impact knocks a rock off the surface of a planet or moon (Mercury, for example) with enough energy that the rock starts orbiting the sun instead of the planet. It would most likely be on a fairly eccentric orbit in that case and that orbit might cross the orbit of another planet (like the Earth). When the second planet happens to be in the same place as the rock, it falls as a meteor.
The Moon? (Score:3)
Are they sure it's not green cheese from the Moon?
Re: (Score:1)
Or.. (Score:2)
Picture? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
its a real article! (Score:1)
Seriously its a real article, thought the april fools had kicked in
Meanwhile, in Kansas (Score:2)
Meanwhile, in Kansas, a farmer and his wife are happy to announce the birth of their son. According to friends and family, Martha never appeared pregnant, not for a day.
Re:Meanwhile, in Kansas (Score:5, Funny)
You're obviously not from a rural town. Whenever an older woman who never appeared pregnant magically shows up with a baby, that means her 16 year-old daughter who went to "California" for a year got knocked up. "Krypton" ain't nothing but the back seat of Jed's Camaro; coincidentally on his "hey y'all watch this" night down at that abandoned nuclear silo.
Re: (Score:2)
...and at the end of it all, he wakes up and finds Bobby in the shower.
Wouldn't that be a big middle finger to the audience? >:]
Re: (Score:2)
...and at the end of it all, he wakes up and finds Bobby in the shower.
Wouldn't that be a big middle finger to the audience? >:]
Not sure if it could be as big a middle finger to the audience as 'The New 52'.
Re: (Score:2)
nah, that's the bit immediately prior to the waking-up-from-three-year-coma-in-your-own-bed bit.
Re: (Score:2)
...and at the end of it all, he wakes up and finds Bobby in the shower.
Wouldn't that be a big middle finger to the audience? >:]
Not sure if it could be as big a middle finger to the audience as 'The New 52'.
I wish I had mod points.
Green is the color of Islam! (Score:1)
I'm sure some superstitious Islamists will take it a green rock as a sign from Allah. The crazy stories/claims that emerge should be amusing.
ps. for those that don't know, green is the color of Islam (and in other cultures in ages past, of demons and Satan himself; although its all anti-scientific and conrtadictory superstitious nonsense; just letting ya know the trivia).
Re: (Score:3)
Hmmm (Score:2)
Do they have April 1st in Morocco, or do they run on an Islamic calendar
Frivolous science - again (Score:2)
This sounds like the frivolous science from the past decades. Before this meteorite from 'Mercury' there was a meteorite allegedly from 'Mars'. They even fooled poor president Clinton to utter upon it. http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/clinton.html [nasa.gov]
It is April 1st today, but these mercurian reports from a dude called Irving came yesterday.
Don't the scientists at NASA and elsewhere have anything better to do than identify earthlings rocks as extraterrestrial. Self-deception is indeed a strong force, but this is ge
Re: (Score:2)
Your link refers to a particular Mars meteorite that some people thought might contain evidence of life.
You've misunderstood that. The meteorite is from Mars. The "life" part was questionable, but the "Mars" part was real. Nobody was "fooled" into thinking it's from Mars; it's really from Mars, and scientists haven't changed their mind about that.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, the life argument was bad, but so were the arguments supporting a Martian origin.
You have been misled in how well supported they are.
"While the claim remains highly controversial" http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8004 [newscientist.com]
"At first ALH84001 was misclassified, so it wasn't until 1993 that researchers even realized the rock came from Mars. That was interesting enough, because at the time fewer than a dozen Martian meteorites were known to science. But ALH84001 also turned out to be much more ancient than
Re: (Score:2)
You are taking that sentence out of context. That article absolutely does not say that it is controversial that the meteorite came from Mars. The only part that is controversial is the part about the life. It's right there in the article:
Furthermore, the article is actually about locating where on Mars the meteorite comes from. At no point does it ever say that th
Re: (Score:2)
[I've been on vacation]
Ok, the other one.
Why was it 'misclassified'? What on Earth could have led them to have it 'misclassified'?
In other words, how many minerals on Earth are sufficiently similar to have it misidentified?
Without knowing the answer, I would guess many.
NWA 7325 (Score:1)
Mercury rock rich in Ca and Mg but low in Fe (Score:1)