Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Transportation Science Technology

Cryogenic Truck Services Remote Telescopes 38

coondoggie writes "Moving a 115-ton telescope down a mountain and 40 miles on the back of a humongous truck to a servicing facility is no task for the timid. It's a job the caretakers of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), an international astronomy facility, no longer have to worry about thanks to a new custom designed truck that can transport and service ALMA's temperature-sensitive astronomical equipment without removing a telescope from the working array at 16,500 feet in the Chilean mountains."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cryogenic Truck Services Remote Telescopes

Comments Filter:
  • More on ALMA (Score:5, Informative)

    by Dusty101 ( 765661 ) on Sunday September 04, 2011 @06:39PM (#37304596)

    For anyone who wants to know more about the ALMA project as a whole, here's the project's main page:

    http://www.almaobservatory.org/ [almaobservatory.org]

    (Disclaimer: I work for the project as a staff astronomer).

  • by ALecs ( 118703 ) on Sunday September 04, 2011 @06:41PM (#37304606) Homepage

    Disclaimer: I work for the National Radio Astronomy Observatory [nrao.edu] (the US partner for ALMA).

    There's lots more info on the transporters available on the ALMA web site. The two antenna transporters, named "Otto" and "Lore", have their own page at http://almaobservatory.org/en/technology/transporters. [almaobservatory.org] Each transporter actually has 2 500kW power plants (for redundancy) and cooling them at 5km altitude is a major challenge (actually, the datacenter has the same problem -- there's just not enough air up there to remove the heat).

    There's lots more pictures of them carrying antennas [almaobservatory.org] there, too.

    Finally, a video of the transporter taking the first ALMA antenna to the high site [almaobservatory.org] .

  • Misleading summary (Score:5, Informative)

    by wolvesofthenight ( 991664 ) on Sunday September 04, 2011 @07:01PM (#37304674)
    Despite what the summary says, we will still have to take antennas down the mountain to service them. We just won't have to take them down specifically to service the receiver.

    For those of you wondering: Alma has 2 major work sites. The Array Operations Site (AOS) at 5000 meters elevation. This is a great spot for scientific observations, but also harsh work environment. So there is also an Operations Support Facility (OSF) at 3000m where the antennas are assembled and tested. The antenna transporters, of which are far more impressive than the Front End Service Vehicle, easily move the antennas to the high site. They will also move them around at the high site, much like the different configurations of the VLA (well, now the EVLA).

    Actually, moving those antennas gets boring fast - and we want to keep it that way (yes, I am currently working there). The transporter goes at a few KPH - around a fast walk. Or 1st gear, if you insist on car analogies. Moving them around is only a big deal because of the cost in time, manpower, and down time of the antenna. It is about a 1/2 day trip to take an antenna 1-way, so the time adds up fast.

    You can find more on the project at our webpage here: http://www.almaobservatory.org/ [almaobservatory.org]
  • by dierdorf ( 37660 ) on Monday September 05, 2011 @01:12AM (#37306324) Homepage

    Well, mainly because human beings cannot survive at 5000m without oxygen masks, while 3000m is bearable. The residence halls, laboratories, control rooms, and servicing facilities are at the lower altitude. Even at Mauna Kea (4100m), the telescope control rooms are further down the mountain where out-of-shape astronomers and technicians are less likely to drop dead.

    They didn't mention in the article that, in the interest of keeping the drivers alive, those trucks (Transporter and servicer) have pressurized cabins just like an airplane.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 05, 2011 @04:01AM (#37306798)

    This is wrong, human beings can survive just fine at 5000m. I have been at the high site as a visitor, and nobody working there sports an oxygen mask (although oxygen bottles are available in the minivans should the need arise). All you need is a quick test, then you are good to go.

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...