Climate Scientists Ask For Help Fighting Somali Pirates 300
thebchuckster writes "Scientists are seeking the help of the Australian and US navies to repel Somali pirates who are threatening one of the world's key climate monitoring programs. They hope to deploy about 20 robotic instruments in a no-go area north of Mauritius. The instruments, which record ocean heat and salinity patterns, are programmed to submerge and eventually resurface to upload their data to satellites."
Correlation (Score:5, Funny)
But global warming is caused by a lack of pirates!
Re: (Score:3)
But global warming is caused by a lack of pirates!
Ergo we need to deploy sensors near an area of high pirate activity.
.. best solution to Indian Sea piracy (Score:2, Insightful)
Now that the USA is winding down ops in Iraq and Afghanistan there'll be available drone operators who'll need to keep their skills sharp. What better use for Global Hawk and Predator drones and a few Hellfire missiles? Instead of blowing up wedding parties and funerals they could be doing something useful and take out Somali pirates. The unmanned drone optics are more than adequate quality to easily avoid mis-identifying their targets.
Re:Correlation (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmm... when looking at the governments around the world, I'd say it's due to an overpopulation of zombies.
Easy solution (Score:2)
House the probes in old WW2 mines - armed of course...
Then just give the big shipping boats GPS coordinates, and let the pirates "find" them if they wish.
Seems to solve multiple problems as the pirates find more and more of them...
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Easy solution (Score:5, Insightful)
Given that the pirates are using any old junk to mount their attacks, I'm guessing that there would be no economic incentive to hunt them down under the historical mechanism of condemnation and sale. Some sort of bounty-based alternative, in addition to the cost, would amount to offering to pay anybody who can come up with a few rusty Kalashnikovs and a boat full of dead Somalis. What could possibly go wrong?
Re: (Score:2)
Given that the pirates are using any old junk to mount their attacks
This assumption is wrong; under their current business model, they (the warlords) reinvest the ransom into better hardware and manpower- what they lack in style they make up with fast boats, many hands, and *lots* of ammo.
This piracy thing is in no way a one-time-only gig; look how it goes on and on.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Easy solution (Score:5, Funny)
You've got the wrong idea entirely, frankly. Mercenaries are expensive. Tourism, however, is profitable. So, you make it like a safari. You know, for the chance to go send some pirates to Davy Jones' locker. The 'fishing license' just absolves prospective pirate hunters from prosecution.
So, you restore and or build a few PT style boats, strap a few twin-fifties, miniguns and grenade launchers on pintle mounts, and let any sociopath with ten thousand bucks to spare have some fun. You'd have a waiting list a mile long.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, with those selection criteria for pirate hunters, I think that I might want the pirates to win. The people at the intersection of "sociopathic thrill-killers" and "substantial disposable income" are not exactly the ones you want making it back from vacation alive.
Dead pirates, dead rich sociopaths, win-win.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget the torpedoes. Tune them to follow the arrrrrgh's!
Re: (Score:2)
Pirates will just spot the things and stay away, going after easier targets. Meanwhile anybody who's not a pirate gets murdered by your safari freaks, turning the freaks into the actual pirates.
Besides, massive human rights violations aren't going to make you popular with developed nations, they might just use their military escort troops in the area to kill your freaks.
Re: (Score:2)
Letters of Mark are what you issue to create pirates. The recipient then goes and harasses the shipping of your enemies, and you hope(*) that they'll be treated as prisoners of war if captured, rather than summarily executed or whatever your enemy does to criminals and spies.
(*) you probably don't care, but you pretend to, to bolster the number of ships willing to take the deal.
Re: (Score:2)
How about these techies use tech to save the day? (Score:2)
Seriously, throw an active sonar pinger on it, before it surfaces to send radio data, have it do a few active pings and make sure no one else is around before surfacing, sending the data, and re-submerging.
You'd probably want to put a little effort into having multiple sensor units pinging at the same time to make it hard for them (the pirates without a lot of tech) to triangulate based on the pulse source.
You're talking a 5 pound sonar module and a few lines of code, a few thousand dollars, far far less th
Re: (Score:2)
The real issue (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
They didn't generally make pirates walk the plank...
What they used to do is hang them in a public place off the shore (or just their head). So other pirates will see a bunch of bodies and get scared.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because then you can't LEAVE them hanging there at the entrance to the port as a warning to all the other pirates.
Re:The real issue (Score:5, Interesting)
The Royal Navy used to sail back into port with the pirates still swinging from the yardarm. Icky.
But seriously, given that we're talking about a handful of people, the expense is trifling for any Western government - the problem is jurisdictional issues. Essentially, many of the European countries doubt that their constitutions would allow them to exercise jurisdiction; others doubt that a case could be proven beyond reasonable doubt; Kenya is fed up of being a dumping ground for sufficient numbers of pirates as actually do make them a financial burden and Somalia has no functioning government to do anything.
Re: (Score:2)
It's also a rather large area of ocean that needs to be covered which requires quite a few ships. Maybe one aircraft carrier could do it but that's still a big commitment. Something like a modernized PT boat would be pretty effective I imagine.
Re: (Score:2)
death penalty for vadnalism? (Score:5, Insightful)
any pirates who would attack scientific intstruments are committing property crime. the death penalty seems a little harsh.
as for the pirates that attack people, well, somalia doesn't really have a government to speak of.
and if you think you can 'solve the problem' by intimidating a few of them, you might want to read about what motivates them in the first place. i.e. there is a massive drought in the region right now, millions of people are starving... as i write this.
if i were in their shoes, and you asked me if i wanted to be a pirate, and maybe eat, i dont know what i would say. you see, i've never been starving to death and watched my whole family die.
in my humble opinion, instead of starting a nother never ending 'war on piracy', we could instead try to stop the corruption and malfeasance that prevent the somalis from engaging in ordinary business activity. i.e. start enforcing international laws regarding the fisheries off of their coasts.
Re: (Score:3)
So I guess boarding a boat and pillaging it is simply the 'confiscation of non-legal goods in their territory', and as such people shouldn't be put to death for it. Yeah the Russians have a good idea to deal with pirates, kill them at sea. Of course the rest of the western world has a 'catch and release' program. Where the pirates are caught, and dumped back ashore. There's a real reason why that trade land became safer when the Russians got there.
Political Correctness (Score:3)
Asshats like you are the problem today. i wish there was a law to kill stupidity.
So you would like a law to silence people whose ideas you find offensive?
Wow, talk about loving big huge government. Where do you nutcases come from?
Re: (Score:3)
Good job changing the subject.
When you said, "I wish there was a law to kill stupidity," you were talking about the parent poster. He said something that offended you and you wanted a law to silence him.
Why do you feel such a sense of entitlement? Why do you want big daddy government to solve all your problems?
Re: (Score:2)
It was an idiotic suggestion. There is no good solution. Killing them is not really going to help a lot but it cuts down on repeat offenders. There is no other solution at all. Somalia is broken beyond any fixing. You'd have to kill everyone there to save them, it's that screwed up. If you go in and try to feed people you wind up fighting for your life because the warlords will be all over you. It's their territory and you are encroaching. You give the food to them and they distribute it...it's been
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The proper way to deal with pirates is to kill them on the spot. No other method works. Jurisdictional issues are a nightmare, so criminal trial is out of the question. No need for needless brutality by sending home their body parts or anything like that; just shoot them and feed them to the sharks. If there are any legal inquiries after the fact, just remember they fired first and the victim ship was doing what was necessary to save the lives of the crew. Nobody needs to hear any differently.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The real issue is that once upon a time people in Somali could make a living fishing off their shores. Boats passing through the Suez canal dump their waste in international waters, which is roughly defined as "not the red sea or the mediterranean", which the end result of most of the ships dumping their pollutants into the Somali waters. The country has complained to the UN, who won't do anything about the issue unless oil rights are transferred from the Chinese to America as protection money. This has
Re: (Score:2)
Stop "catching" them.
We don't "catch" the enemies we hit with airstrikes or artillery nor is there an expectation that we should.
Blow them out of the water, don't strafe them with small arms.
Re: (Score:2)
The Russians have a fine solution -- just release them immediately, in the middle of the sea, with no fuel. After all, you certainly don't need a trial not to hold someone.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/piracy/7713375/Somali-pirates-captured-and-released-by-Russian-navy-have-died.html [telegraph.co.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
And as they are walking the plank, they remind you of the fact that their compatriots have several hundred other hostages. Some of whom will be killed if they aren't returned in one piece. I don't know about you, but if I were some little third world country, I wouldn't want the Russians blaming me for getting one of their freighter crews killed in retribution.
If you can't blow the pirates out of the water right there, before they radio their situation back to their base, you risk hostage deaths. If they j
But these are bots! How do you threaten them? (Score:2)
"Oooh, a Somali pirate! I'm scared now! Oh sure, the scientists will pay whatever you ask them! Here, take my leg! Please! So I can be a peg leg like you! Let's see what your Mom has to say about that!"
Why not pay off the pirates. (Score:2)
Or just get a Navy vessel to drop off the gear. Get in some target practice on
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Because it gives them money from a non-piracy endeavour...
Such as what? It would certainly give them more money to fun piracy-based endeavors, though.
Replace buoys with trained sharks (Score:2)
Two problems solved.
(Three if the sharks have lasers.)
Re: (Score:2)
Two problems solved.
(Three if the sharks have lasers.)
What could possibly go wrong?
Do not pay that randsom... (Score:2)
I wonder if there are any roving spy blimps that could be tasked to spend some time tracking all boats in the area around somalia. Its a big ocean but if you can watch the coast , catch them leaving and track it might work?
The information could be used to warn others where the pirates are or for the more hawkish amoung us allow nations who have had enough to intercept them.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Insightful)
Because they learned a long time ago they could take the money ... then act immorally anyway and win on both sides.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, until the Vikings sue them over the patent violation on their business method. It's Danegeld, after all, not Somaligeld.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, with their pockets full of money they'd be too permanently drunk to bother with hard work like piracy.
OTOH there's a lot of Somalians, paying all of them might cost a lot of money.
OTOH ... it's only bits of paper. Give them enough and the inflation it causes will ruin the Somalian economy. Maybe their own government will shoot them for us if we do that.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
Give it to whom precisely? Somalia has been in a civil war for the last 20 years, there isn't anybody that can take the money and make it happen. Most folks there are more concerned with starving or being killed to do anything about this.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
The "civil war" is largely a creation of foreign and now AFRICOM interference.
http://webarchive.ssrc.org/Somalia_Hoehne_v10.pdf [ssrc.org]
"Thanks to half a century of pouring US arms stockpiles into Africa, the price of an assault rifle in Africa has for some time been cheaper than anyplace else on the planet."
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/africom-americas-military-foot-africas-doorway [blackagendareport.com]
Somali "piracy" is the outcome of the illegal, exhaustive, industrialised over-fishing of Somali waters, by foreign fleets - leaving the coastal towns without any livelihood.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/you-are-being-lied-to-abo_b_155147.html [huffingtonpost.com]
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/4/14/analysis_somalia_piracy_began_in_response [democracynow.org]
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1892376,00.html [time.com]
The US manufactures foreign wars and "terrorists" the same way it used to lead in the creation of Automobiles and heavy manufacturing. But remember your Gibbon: The decline of Rome was seeded from its very rise on world's stage.
Re: (Score:2)
And your point is? Regardless of how the nation came to be in the state that it's in, there isn't any functioning government there at the moment.
Re: (Score:2)
It's being kept that way.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh. And the whole "climate science" angle is just there to recruit the liberal/progressive sentiment into supporting more neo-colonial imperial adventure.
"Hey, no time or money to create jobs, you guys. We have to invade AFRICA and save THE PLANET!"
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Insightful)
And your point is? Regardless of how the nation came to be in the state that it's in, there isn't any functioning government there at the moment.
It makes me laugh when I hear neo-cons say "government isn't the solution, it IS the problem". If you want to see what not having a functioning government looks like, go to Somalia. It even has religious extremism.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
Thats great and everything, but the US, French, British, South Africans aren't the only destabilizing influence, following decolonization in Africa the Soviets dumped thousands of tanks, thousands of aircraft, tens of thousands of large caliber weapons and millions of guns into Africa from 1960 through 1989.
For the region
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etheopia#Mengistu_Era [wikipedia.org]
"In 1977, there was the Ogaden War, when Somalia captured the part of the Ogaden region, but Ethiopia was able to recapture the Ogaden after receiving military aid from the USSR, Cuba, South Yemen, East Germany and North Korea, including around 15,000 Cuban combat troops."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somalia#Communist_rule [wikipedia.org]
"By 1978, the Somali troops were ultimately pushed out of the Ogaden. This shift in support by the Soviet Union motivated the Barre government to seek allies elsewhere. It eventually settled on Russia's Cold War arch-rival, the United States, which had been courting the Somali government for some time. All in all, Somalia's initial friendship with the Soviet Union and later partnership with the United States enabled it to build the largest army in Africa."
So the Soviets backed Somalia and loaded them with weapons, then Somalia starts to lose, the Soviets dump weapons into Ethiopia and the US back the Somalis, but all you care to cite are sources blaming it on the US.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
Uh, no. The primary rifle used by militias in Africa is going to be the Kalashnikov because it's cheap, rugged, any idiot can use it, and it's light enough for a child to carry. Which is useful, of course, if you want to arm children. As you might guess from the name, the Kalashnikov is a Russian assault rifle that was sold off in vast quantities by Warsaw Pact countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:4, Interesting)
Why doesn't the govt give Somalis money for acting morally?
Which government? The Somali government? It sounds like calling that a government is being charitable. Warlords might even be charitable. They just started allowing aid into the country [metro.co.uk] for the worst drought in 60 years with 11 million people starving. [globalpost.com]
The US? We're not really big on spending money overseas except if it's Israel or bombing someone. And, truth be told, we have a terrible record of giving money and aid to bad people only to have to kill them later on after they've killed a lot of innocent people. Though again, the situation is pretty bad already. If there were a way to make the situation worse, the US would be hard-pressed to find it.
Anyone else? Not interested in Somalia or incapable of doing anything. Somalia has been a failed state for a while now.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
The US? We're not really big on spending money overseas except if it's Israel or bombing someone.
I'm guessing you're young. The US (under President Clinton) sent its military into Somalia in the early 1990s with the goal of stabilizing the situation enough to allow aid (both goverment-sponsored and that of private relief agencies) to help ameliorate an ongoing famine. Given the way it ended, I doubt the US government has much motivation to attempt helping Somalia again.
If you don't trust the slant of a military-published document, dig up some old newspaper archives. I think you'll learn why so many governments appear to be ignoring Somalia.
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
Bah - forgot the link [army.mil].
Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, it was Bush I who sent the military to Somalia to provide security so aid could be distributed. It was Clinton who decided to try "regime change"...........and that resulted in Black Hawk Down.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mogadishu_(1993) [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
That was then, in a relatively stable post-USSR world. This is now, in the age of instant digital fearmongering, rampant invisible terrorist threats, and overwhelming governmental corruption and outright bribery. Expecting anything to get done even 1/10th as efficiently as a 1990s government is just pointless.
Can we have Bill back, please?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt the US government has much motivation to attempt helping Somalia again... I think you'll learn why so many governments appear to be ignoring Somalia.
On the contrary, the US is very interested in Somalia for the very same reasons the pirates are - it's lack of government and infrastructure means whoever has the most money/guns in their own patch is the law. This makes it an ideal location for the CIA to set up secret prisons [salon.com], as well as pirates to set up their base of operations.
Re: (Score:2)
"Somalia has been a failed state for a while now."
By your definition of government, maybe.
Just because Somalia has a different government structure then most countries (I consider no government "different", and nothing more) does not mean we should preclude them from discussion venues such as the United Nations or even more personal dialogs with individual nations.
Most of these "pirates" are regular people forced into this role by outside influences. Most coastal communities in Somalia have been devastated
Re: (Score:2)
So now we can get paid for acting nicely? And here I've been doing it for free!
Dependence (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
As opposed to Bush II raising the debt ceiling (7 times in 8 years), lowering taxes, and increasing spending like a drunken sailor. Choose your poison.
(Most) Republicans only care about the debt ceiling when there's a Democrat in the White House.
Re: (Score:2)
Obama already offered the Reps a deal: Raise the debt ceiling and taxes, cut spendings drastically. Instead the Reps don't want to hear anything about tax raises.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Cutting taxes will only boost the economy if the economy is being choked by the taxes. That's not even close to what's happening in the western world so tax cuts won't boost the economy, only empty the govt's coffers. Maybe in an extreme case it can turn you into a tax haven but that's not a terribly good idea either as Ireland's troubles show.
Re: (Score:3)
Missed it by that much.
Re: (Score:2)
*checks the time stamps*
Sorry, you were one minute late. Those damned dirty Pastafarians apparently have invented time travel. Does his noodliness's gifts know any bounds?
FAITH
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps he meant queue?
Re: (Score:2)
Ah ha, so there _is_ a correlation between pirates and global warming!
Hockey stick indeed; its scimitar shaped.
Avast, you'll no be needing that gold now.
Re: (Score:2)
The point is, the scientists need to drop the sensors into the pirate infested waters, and no commercial ship dares to go there. So they are hoping a military ship will take them to drop the sensors. Hope it works out.
Re: (Score:2)
US and other naval warships patrol the area. All you have to do is ask to tag along behind one and drop the sensors.
No extra cost, no big deal.
Re: (Score:2)
That's kind of the whole point. They need to place them in specific locations, so they're asking to tag along behind one after it goes where they need it to.
Head in sand. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Having a tough life ?
The problem isn't the instruments, the problem is pirates attacking the scientists as they go to place them. The area of interest is a no-go area of the Indian Ocean.
But with piracy in the western Indian Ocean making it too dangerous for commercial or research vessels to deploy the robotic devices, Australia's government research department, the CSIRO, hope naval forces will help them out.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem isn't the instruments, the problem is pirates attacking the scientists as they go to place them.
Deploy them with parachutes from a C-17 or something similar. Armed with a couple of electric Gatling guns, they could have some fun with the pirates while doing noble science.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you seriously saying that you never heard of Somalia before a few days ago? You never heard about the brutality of the warlords, the civil war, the pirates, the international naval effort to patrol the piracy-infested waters, and the kidnappings that the pirates have engaged in? I'm kind of hoping that's not what you meant, but it's difficult to construe it in any other way. Even Slashdot has reported off-and-on about the situation, though nowhere near as much as the constant barrage of Facebook, Twi
Re: (Score:2)
Point taken though, this was probably the wrong story to comment on this
Re: (Score:2)
Super intelligent (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is indeed an inverse relationship between someone's competence, and their own belief in their competence.
<pedant>Wait.. so what does that say about your competence?</pedant>
Re: (Score:2)
It is a waste of time arguing yesterdays argument with those of such limited intelligence as you. Ironicall they same losers who doubt the honesty of climate scientists, usually are pro nuke, and in an astonishing display of cognitive dissonance are happy to believe known employees of the nuclear industry as unbiased sources.
The sceptics are living in the past ignore them and move on to action.
Not worth wasting any more time on these idiots.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Name me one Presidential candidate recently who hasn't exaggerated to make a point. Maybe Ron Paul but I doubt it.
It's damn near impossible to find an "anti-AGW" statement that has not been proven false or at least ridiculously exaggerated.
Re: (Score:3)
You need to look into things a bit more deeply than you apparently do. Please give me a quote from Phil Jones where he admits manipulating data for other than valid scientific reasons. Does one mistake (Himalayan glaciers) in the IPCC AR4 report invalidate the thousands of other points in the report? That's like getting a F on a final exam because you missed one question out of 100. The IPCC had nothing to do with the climate refugees statement. That was a think tank associated with the UN. And I beli
Re: (Score:2)
Climate scientists have moved beyond whether CO2 in the atmosphere causes warming. You can read the signature of CO2 capturing radiant energy in the spectrum of the planet. I have read the IPCC AR4 Working Group I Summary for Policy Makers. What's your point? You don't like the way they're simplifying the uncertainty for non-scientists? If they can't be virtually certain about something but only consider it very likely we can ignore the risk? Science doesn't work in absolutes (except zero).
The WG1 rep
Re: (Score:2)
You know most of these pirates simply want to have food medical care and a way to support their families. People who have food, and a means to support themselves and their families are usually very enthusiastic about science and learning.
This is true, but their behaviour is caused by systemic violence and corruption in their society. Either you go into their country and tame the savages (we all know how that turns out), or you let them sort out their own problems. If you choose the later, then shooting pirates is just applying the golden rule. If I engaged in piracy myself, I would expect violence to be a natural consequence of my actions. They have to learn how to take care of themselves without leeching off of others.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh please. Globalization has been around for a couple of centuries, the only thing that has changed is the scope of operations. By encompassing more of the globe, more people have better lives than they ever had before. (btw how's that computer you're using working out for you?)
You should apologize to the people in Dresden who went through that - to compare inner cities in the US to that is ridiculous hyperbole.
I'm very grateful that if things ever became as bad here in North America as they are in Somalia
Re: (Score:2)
It is a fact.
As societies become more mature and are education and technology based, people tremendously reduce their population and growth and consumption rates for food, energy housing etc.
From Europe, to Japan, to USA populations are contracting.
As for the idea of globalism being around forever, in some aspects that is true if we are talking about Imperialism.
But Globalism in the context I am speaking of is far far worse than imperialism and is quite new.
This Globalism seeks to destroy the concept of sov
Re: (Score:2)
All the money they've made will be worthless.
Re: (Score:2)
Facts are not something I associate with climatedepot.
Re: (Score:2)
The costs are already covered if they can sail their research vessel in those waters. Because it's too dangerous for them to go in there on their own they're asking for some help getting the buoys distributed. I guess someone will have to step up and eat the additional costs but I imagine it could be considered training time for some naval vessel.
Re: (Score:2)
Too small. Don't approach with a ship because that creates an expectation of taking prisoners.
Use drones and kill the target with a missile.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Asshole poster is asshole, what a surprise. What part of the US are you from? (The attitude of use violence first is most typically a US approach).
As Churchill said the Americans always do the right thing eventually. Your crap is an example of trying everything else first.
Grow the fuck up.
Re: (Score:2)