Tales of the Dying Earth 55
Tales of the Dying Earth | |
author | Jack Vance |
pages | 752 |
publisher | St. Martin's Press |
rating | 8.5 |
reviewer | Duncan Lawie |
ISBN | 0312874561 |
summary | One of the ur-books of SF and of fantasy, and a delight to read. |
Jack Vance, like most of his generation, is a veteran of the second world war, during which he started to write. He has continued to be published for over half a century, garnering a worthy collection of awards along the way, including one for his detective fiction. However, his most significant contribution has been to science fiction concepts of the far future and its tropes of planetary romance. In fact, his Tales of the Dying Earth largely defined a subgenre of the distant future. Even Gene Wolfe's Book of the New Sun, produced over 30 years later, has an apparent debt to Vance.
Tales of the Dying Earth is a recently released omnibus which begins with Vance's first published book -- The Dying Earth from 1950 -- and runs through to his last collection of stories from that setting, published in 1984. Over the extensive period in which the stories were produced, the definition of science fiction has changed, so that this omnibus is published in the UK as a "Fantasy Masterwork". However, it is apparent from the American cover that his work is still marketed within the SF mainstream there.
With the weight of opinion supporting Vance and the age of the early parts of this tome, it might seem that actually reading it would be a duty rather than a delight. Thankfully, this is not the case -- Vance has a light but sure touch. To an extent, he is making a virtue of his early inability to produce a complex plot, but the collection of vignettes and episodic stories allows a truly broad canvas.
In any case, the Dying Earth is not a place for great epics. When the bloated red sun may go out at any moment, heroics or malevolence each seem destined to go without reward. The world is a palimpsest and the rich breadth of history, whilst mostly lost or jumbled, is sufficient to ensure that few people of the last days expect to rank with the figures of the past. Nevertheless, the follies and foibles of human nature are inescapable and much of the verbiage is concerned with its wry investigation. Verbiage is used advisedly, as Vance clearly enjoys the richness of the English language and takes pleasure in the opportunity to add to what he finds. Some of his artful extensions have reached out of the book and into our usage -- the dying Earth is the native home of the grue , for example.
The first book, The Dying Earth, is a series of short stories, laying the foundations of a vast and ancient world. The next two, The Eyes of the Overworld and Cugel's Saga make up the bulk of the volume, describing Cugel's accidental journeys across the face of the planet. The final book, Rhialto the Marvellous, focuses on a coterie of magicians. The protagonists are flawed yet have a high opinion of themselves. Cugel often appears unlikely to get away with more than his life but faces both riches and poverty with equanimity. He is almost an archetypal trickster/thief and yet he is a very distinct individual. Rhialto also shows how influential Vance was in defining the idea of the magician, being both intelligent and cunning.
The magic within the book is vast and vague, allowing a reasoned approach to come to any conclusion it chooses -- perhaps deciding that the daemons have an extraterrestrial rather than a supernatural origin. Some of the stories offer the picaresque of a travelogue. Many offer a puzzle of some sort. On occasion, the narration reveals the solution before the character -- usually Cugel -- even notices the problem, allowing the reader to join in the amusement at the players' expense.
In other stories, mostly in the last book, only close reading will uncover something which the central figure considers almost too obvious to even mention. The Dying Earth has such depth and variety that both writer and reader are happy to return time and again to settings old and new. This compleat Tales of the Dying Earth is the essence of reading for pleasure.
You can purchase this book at FatBrain.
Utah Phillips (Score:1)
empty post not permitted
Re:A flawed classic (Score:2)
Live and don't learn, that's my motto
Too right! (Score:2)
Vance: recommended (Score:3)
Jack Vance is a riot (Score:3)
Yes, indeed. The dialogs that go on between characters in Vance's books are extraordinarily entertaining. Not only does he have a great sense of humor and wit, his use of English is in itself entertaining and enlightening. His work, more than anyone else, gave me a renewed appreciation of English and it's wild variety of words and subtle meanings.
I recommend his books even to Literature majors who would normally dismiss it as sci-fi pulp.
Great review Duncan, it's rare to find fiction reviews as insightful as this one on Slashdot.
FatBrain. (Score:1)
The premiere American writer of genre fiction (Score:1)
Much of Vance is out of print, sadly, although there is a project to reprint all of his books in a limited-run collector's edition -- check out http://www.vanceintegral.com
A pleasant surprise, to see a Vance review on Slashdot.
Peace,
(jfb)
Re:A flawed classic (Score:1)
A flawed classic (Score:2)
That said, there's a certain thin quality to the stories in Dying Earth that's kept me from wanting to read them again, even though the book has a permanent place on my shelf. Vance's characters are original and individual, but still strangely flat. They seem to lack not just emotional depth, but self-awareness, so that they wander through life uncaringly, completely unaffected by their adventures; with the result that in the end the reader, too, finds it hard to care what happens to them, and walks away equally unaffected.
So after you've read Dying Earth, do yourself a favor and pick up something like Gene Wolfe's Book of the New Sun or Fritz Lieber's Fafhrd & Grey Mouser stories -- very different works, but each in their own way showing how the same material could have been more rewarding in the hands of a writer less afraid to get his hands dirty.
Re:Richness in language (Score:2)
Re:Richness in language (Score:1)
I did. In fact it has the position of honor on my bookshelf.
There's no accounting for taste, eh?
--
Re:This should never have been out of print (Score:3)
Orb put the 5 Demon Princes novels out in a two-volume trade-sized paperback edition in the late '90s, and I happened to notice them on the shelf in my local bookstore earlier this week.
Ditto for Planet of Adventure, new Orb edition in the early '90s, four short novels in a single trade-sized volume. I've spotted it fairly recently as well.
All these are somewhat old fashioned SciFi, but whacking good fun, and I highly recommend them.
For heroic fantasy, track down his Lyonesse trilogy, which is more recent than the originals of the above, but has not been reprinted AFAIK.
Another pseudo-SciFi that you might be able to find in a used book store is his Maske:Thaery [sp?], which also provides a great good time.
While almost anything Vance ever wrote is worth reading, the above are, IMO, the cream of the cream.
--
Re:Gene Wolfe and Dan Simmons on Jack Vance (Score:1)
"It was her idea to title the book The Dying Earth (a records search showed a novel by that name five hundred years earlier, but the copyright had lapsed and the book was out of print)."
--
Full Time Idiot and Miserable Sod
Wonderful use of language (Score:1)
On the other hand, inventing words can have it's problems, as anyone in the UK will realise when shown a copy of Vance's "Servants of the Wankh"...
Re:Wonderful use of language (Score:1)
Oh yes! They're one of the best things about the books, somehow more honest than trying to sneak an explanation into the dialogue.
Reminds me of Pratchett's stuff, and now that I come to think of it the first two Discworld novels bear more than a passing resemblance to the Dying Earth stories. Rincewind has definite echoes of Cugel in his character, at least in the early stories.
Dying Earth and Talislanta 4th edition -- woo hoo! (Score:1)
How appropriate that both that and the Dying Earth Tales are back out in the world.
Re:Confidence builder (Score:1)
--
Re:Confidence builder (Score:1)
Now, in response, nowhere did I say that people "suffered." I only stated that people were "affected," which could be in good or bad ways. You have some grudge against "suffering" veterans? Maybe you shouldn't read so much of your own biases into my comment.
All I was saying was that the people of that era can be considered "vererans" of the war. I include everyone who was affected, including the military, including the women, including the children, including the migrant farm workers who got better jobs. They're all veterans and that makes the statement, "like most of his generation, is a veteran of the second world war," not flat out wrong. Yes, it's a bit broader definition than we might be used to. Live with it.
--
Re:My favorite parts (Score:2)
Using palimpsest here is accurate, economical and I daresay even elegant. It is a good choice; why are you criticising him just because you had to look it up?
-konstant
Yes! We are all individuals! I'm not!
damnit why couldn't it be (Score:2)
Tales of the Dying Redmond Corporation
Tales of the Dying Silly Patent Lawsuits
Tales of the Dying Anti 2600 Lawsuits
This guy wasn't as innovative as you think he was.
FBI mole almost captured [antioffline.com]
Re:The premiere American writer of genre fiction (Score:2)
> the one true master prose stylist that the
> genres of science fiction and fantasy have
> produced;; only Dick comes within spitting
> distance.
R.A. Lafferty was an even greater stylist (still alive last I heard, but too infirm to write). If you think it's hard to find Vance's books
Re:The premiere American writer of genre fiction (Score:2)
> safe to say that Lafferty dropped way more acid
> than Vance. (Although perhaps not as much as
> Dick
Curiously enough, no acid. Plenty of beer, however.
Lafferty was a conservative Catholic mechanical engineer with no "literary" background (other than being a voracious reader. Definitely no counter-cultural tendencies, despite his very unique style (and subject matter). I suspect his neglect arose from the fact that there was no pigeon-hole in the literary establishment for eccentric literary stylists who were also "cranky right-wingers".
Back in my youth, my family lived in Tulsa, and my little brother had a friend who lived next door to RAL. Consequently, my wife and I got to visit him in his tiny, book-stuffed house.
Jack Vance must die. (Score:3)
Jack Vance is personally responsible for the death of uncountable first-level mages who could only memorize one spell a day and just happened to pick the wrong one, not to mention all the adventuring parties wiped out by orcish hordes due to the accidental choice of a Lightning Bolt over an extra Fireball.
The death toll caused by Vance's books is only comparable to the massive damage inflicted by that most terrible hacker weapon, DeCSS. He must be stopped, and stopped now.
Vance kicks ass (Score:1)
Richness in language (Score:4)
Vance is amazing - and still AVAILABLE - pls mod! (Score:1)
The fantastic "Demon Princes" reprint compilations are available at Amazon. I bought the hardcovers, and love them. A couple of other compilations, and his two most recent books are also available there.
To purchase his complete works (for a considerable price - I would prefer a CD/DVD myself) check out the Vance Integral Edition, as mentioned by another poster (but missed by moderators):
www.vanceintegral.com [vanceintegral.com]
Also, many of his books can be picked up at second hand stores in towns all over the world. I've done this from London (UK) to Manhattan (Kansas)!
It's such a pleasure to read 'soft' sci-fi that occasionally requires a dictionary at hand for complete understanding - and enjoyment. Most of all, his vivid imagery and witty, dry (though sometimes slightly formulaic) dialogue makes me cherish his works like old friends.
Spread the word!
[Antispam] Kill the x in my email address to reply
Gene Wolfe and Dan Simmons on Jack Vance (Score:1)
Gene Wolfe has a published article examining all of the stories that make up the first Dying Earth collection in Jack Vance: Critical Appreciations and a Bibliography (published 2000 by The British Library, ISBN 0-7123-1102-5). The book also has an article by Dan Simmons, author of Hyperion et al., acknowledging his immense debt to Vance.
Re:Richness in language (Score:1)
I find some of Vance's series just tail off: the first Lyonesse book (Suldrun's Garden) was better than either of its sequels; the Durdane novels started well with The Anome but kinda lost it by the time of The Asutra.
The exceptions -- The Demon Princes, Tschai (Planet of Adventure), and of course the Dying Earth books themselves -- only make this more painful for the reader.
Vance's standalone books (other than the lamentable Slaves of the Klau) are by and large excellent. It's just when he's finishing off a long series you sometimes get a feeling he got bored before the end and wanted to move on...
Re:The premiere American writer of genre fiction (Score:1)
Maybe so. But if you want a true master prose stylist from pre-genre fantasy, check out James Branch Cabell.
His most notorious novel, Jurgen, was prosecuted for obscenity in the 1920s; I mention this in case it tempts any goatse.cx-fanciers to give it a go. (Though, for my money, Something About Eve is far ruder).
Re:Wonderful use of language (Score:1)
There's a third, The Quest for Simbilis, but it's not by Vance. It's an alternate sequel to Eyes of the Overworld, written by Michael Shea (whose Nifft the Lean stories are well worth a look, if you like Vance or Leiber), and I suppose was rendered obsolete when Cugel's Saga came out.
Rumour has it that Vance didn't like Shea's book one little bit. (Though I did).
Shea's most recent book is The A'Rak, and The Incomplete Nifft collects his other Nifft stories, AFAIK. (Please advise me if I'm wrong!).
Dying Earth role-playing game (Score:1)
There are various PDF downloads on Pelgrane's site if you want to check out the quality before you buy.
Re:This should never have been out of print (Score:1)
Re:Solaris 8 and OpenWin (Score:1)
Re:This should never have been out of print (Score:1)
Re:A flawed classic (Score:1)
Generally, what I take away from a Vance book (and I think I've read most of them, having scavenged used-bookstore shelves for quite a while now) is the sense that our own customs and lifestyles are arbitrary and more than a little ridiculous.
Re:Wonderful use of language (Score:1)
Re:The premiere American writer of genre fiction (Score:1)
Re:This should never have been out of print (Score:1)
I think literary quality declines in inverse proportion to the number of titles in a particular series. Which is not to say that it's not entertaining, just that it's formula fiction. (Remember "Doc Savage"? Now that was pulp with no redeeming literary value whatsoever. Man, I used to love reading that crap.)
Re:Wonderful use of language (Score:1)
There's only two Cugel books, right? They're definitely the funniest things I've read from Vance.
As for the footnotes, I remember being very impressed by one from "The Last Castle" where Vance explains that what the character said in the main text and what he literally said were different. It reinforced the notion that the story itself was an interpretation of something really quite alien.
"Were power-wagons at hand, I'd volith riding forth with a whip to send the raudlebogs skirkling home."
It's amazing what you can find on google.
Re:This should never have been out of print (Score:1)
And usually the style is horribly reminiscent of fan-fiction. (This blithe over-generalization is based on reading a fair number of the old trek books, plus a truly unfortunate handful of X-files books.)
It's escapist reading with no intention of making you think. Not really bad, but it's the SF equivalent of bodice-ripper romance novels.
Re:Vance's influence -- D&D (Score:1)
But don't forget other major influences: DeCamp and Pratt's "Incomplete Enchanter," Leiber's Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser tales, and of course Robert Howard's Conan tales.
I was Disappointed with This Book (Score:1)
Re:This should never have been out of print (Score:1)
Re:FatBrain. (Score:1)
This should never have been out of print (Score:2)
-----------------
Re:My favorite parts (Score:1)
Verbiage is used advisedly is an extremely awkward phrase.
--Kara
--Kara
My favorite parts (Score:2)
Indeed it is.
Verbiage is used advisedly.
In the book perhaps, but not in the review. Here's a tip, don't use words that you aren't comfortable with in a desperate attempt to appear smart. Just say no.
I understand that pastiche and pretense are par for the course here on slashdot, but you go too far. We can handle 30,000 helpdesk monkeys claiming to be hotshot unix admins - after all, there's a shortage of qualified unix admins. What we do not need is another Jon Katz. One is more than enough.
--Kara
Re:Sci-Fi is for kiddies. (Score:1)
Oh, please!
You're fantastically open-minded, so I won't spend a whole lot of time replying. Suffice it to say that purveyors of childish sci-fi stories absolutely fill the ranks of the scientific community -- and yes, punkass, I'm a real-life scientist, not some pretender who'll bullshit his way through a posting. My work in a pharmaceutical firm puts me in contact daily with molecular biologists, biochemists, bioinformaticists, programmers, physicians, statisticians, engineers
When I climb into my BMW this afternoon and drive home, I'll listen to my Lord of the Rings CD and think of your posting, Anonymous Coward. And I'll just laugh.... You remind me so much of the kids who made fun of me in primary school. Two of them are groundskeepers in my community now.
But please, keep spreading your message about sci-fi. I want my children to have an even greater advantage in their future careers. If you just turn one young mind away from creativity, imagination, or even just learning how to read, my children will have even more room to grow. Keep up the good work.
And for those of you who sense some unapologetic elitism in my reply, you're quite right.
What an odd notion. Wolfe's a useless hack. (Score:1)
they wander through life uncaringly, completely unaffected by their adventures . . . [much snipped] . . . the same material could have been more rewarding in the hands of a writer less afraid to get his hands dirty.
By chance, I've been re-reading a log of old Vance recently (this week: The Faceless Man novels, Night Lamp, and a couple of the Alastor ones), and I'd have to say that you've missed a few important things here.
Vance didn't write the same book over and over. The Dying Earth stories are like what "demo coders" do: Brief exercises in virtuosity for its own sake, just for the sheer joy of it. Vance's other forty-odd books go in different directions. Generalizing about Vance from just one or a few of his books is a silly business. Even if you say "Vance writes lovely prose", you'd still be wrong in a few cases -- and that's just about as close as you can get to a meaningful generalization about Vance. You might also say he's not often very interested in plotting. But is he interested in character development? Yes. Obsessively so, at times.
As for Wolfe, he's a drab fake, entirely beneath contempt. I waded through half of one of the "Long Sun" things and I have, literally, no recollection of any of it. There was nothing interesting, compelling, or memorable in that book.
Wolfe's a hack in the Guy Gavriel Kay mode: He goes through some of the motions of pretendint to be a real writer like Vance, but he'll never fool anybody who knows the difference. Orson Scott Card's a big Wolfe fan, if I recall correctly, and that says it all -- except Card makes up for his inadequate technique by telling compelling stories about memorable characters. Wolfe is just a blank.
Fritz Leiber, now: There's a real writer. He's in Vance's league, and that's rarefied company indeed. Lord Dunsany, anybody?
Re:My favorite parts (Score:2)
Is the use of unusal words to be frowned upon? Should we all refrain from using interesting words lest we be accused of trying to appear "smart"?
What makes you think he was uncomfortable with the words he used?
Re:clarafication: exactly how is this new? (Score:2)
Vance's influence (Score:4)
no, dat's wat's funny about dem (Score:1)
Get the joke?
Check out John Crowley (Score:1)
Fifth Head, Icehenge, etc. (Score:1)
- Icehenge
and- The Fifth Head of Cerberus
, but didn't realize that they were conscious. That said, I think Icehenge is a very politically important book, though it may be difficult for those who might benefit most from it.Often, Wolfe's stories can be likened to one segment of Kurosawa's
- Rashomon
, or one viewpoint of Faulkner's- As I Lay Dying
. The puzzles are more difficult because we must usually tweak out the "truth" from internal inconsistencies, rather than having extra help of external inconsistencies to rely on.While we all bring something to the table as interpreters when we read, Wolfe insists that his readers bring much more than usual.