Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Submission + - More troubles for authors of controversial acid-bath stem cell articles. (nature.com)

bmahersciwriter writes: Reports early this year about a strikingly simple method for deriving pluripotent stem cells were met with amazement and deep scepticism, then claims that the experiments were not reproducible, then accusations of copied and manipulated figures. Now, the first author of one of the papers is being lambasted for having copied the first 20 pages of her doctoral thesis from an NIH primer on stem cells. And an adviser on her thesis committee says he was never asked to review it. Could this get any stranger? Probably!
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

More troubles for authors of controversial acid-bath stem cell articles.

Comments Filter:

Once it hits the fan, the only rational choice is to sweep it up, package it, and sell it as fertilizer.

Working...