Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Biotech Government Medicine United States

America's FDA Eases Restrictions on Mask-Sterilizing Technology Amid Coronavirus Shortages (usatoday.com) 67

USA Today reports: Ohio Governor Mike DeWine Sunday afternoon said federal officials have promised to ease restrictions on a technology to clean and reuse the masks deemed the safest for healthcare workers and first responders in the coronavirus outbreak....

Officials are scrambling for the N95 masks and other protective equipment for health care workers as the number of COVID-19 cases is expected to spike over the coming months. On Saturday, DeWine publicly pleaded with the FDA to approve an emergency-use permit for [Columbus-based research firm] Battelle's technology amid a shortage of personal protective equipment, including masks.... The U.S. death total has doubled in two days, climbing above 2,300 Sunday. Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has been a leading voice in the effort to curb the outbreak, said 100,000 to 200,000 Americans could die before the crisis is over.

DeWine said those numbers make it urgent for the FDA to clean as many masks as it can... The Battelle process uses "vapor phase hydrogen peroxide" to sanitize the N95 masks, allowing them to be reused up to 20 times, the company said in a statement. Each of the company's Critical Care Decontamination Systems can sterilize 80,000 masks per day, Battelle said... DeWine on Sunday said the FDA authorized Battelle to sterilize just 10,000 surgical masks a day. "They're only approved a fraction of what we can do," DeWine said during the press conference.

But DeWine said in his afternoon press conference that an FDA commissioner told him "this would be cleared up today."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

America's FDA Eases Restrictions on Mask-Sterilizing Technology Amid Coronavirus Shortages

Comments Filter:
  • Why not ramp up production of ethylene oxide sterilization units? They are just basiclly sealed cabinets. It is very effective, and works well on sensitive materials that cannot tolorate heat or harsh methods.

    • Possibly because the stuff is rather nasty, but that's a solved problem. Industrial gas suppliers sell it for a variety of uses so there should be no shortage. Airgas and Air Liquide sell it (I weld so I knew who to check).

      https://www.who.int/medical_de... [who.int]

      • by RedShoeRider ( 658314 ) on Sunday March 29, 2020 @09:11PM (#59886448)

        ....because Ethylene Oxide has a problem with something like a facemask:

        https://www.cdc.gov/infectionc... [cdc.gov]

        TL;DR: "ETO is absorbed by many materials. For this reason, following sterilization the item must undergo aeration to remove residual ETO.". There's a large part of the problem with ETO sterilization: you have to let it offgas for X period of time depending on the material sterilized. In the case of N95's, being that you have a wide, wide variety of manufacturers, and therefore different materials with different offgassing rates, to figure out X mask must be offgassed for Y time....forget it. And screwing it up has consequence, because it's a guaranteed exposure to the wearer. They will inhale the unreacted/unaerated ETO. Not good. It has an exposure limit of 1PPM.

        Now, VHP is nasty in its own right, but it's whole, whole lot safer if you don't get all of the unreacted peroxide back out of the mask. Yes, it could still cause respiratory tract problems if inhaled. In this case, though, it's the safer bet.

        • by piojo ( 995934 )

          ....because Ethylene Oxide has a problem with something like a facemask:

          https://www.cdc.gov/infectionc... [cdc.gov]

          TL;DR: "ETO is absorbed by many materials. For this reason, following sterilization the item must undergo aeration to remove residual ETO.". There's a large part of the problem with ETO sterilization: you have to let it offgas for X period of time depending on the material sterilized. In the case of N95's, being that you have a wide, wide variety of manufacturers, and therefore different materials with different offgassing rates, to figure out X mask must be offgassed for Y time....forget it. And screwing it up has consequence, because it's a guaranteed exposure to the wearer. They will inhale the unreacted/unaerated ETO. Not good. It has an exposure limit of 1PPM.

          I'm not sure it's that bad. The EtO fifteen minute exposure limit is 5 ppm. If some small fraction of a mL of gas remains in the mask and the final outgassing is into the wearer's lungs over a period of fifteen minutes, it would be well within the exposure limit. Assuming an average volume of respiration, I calculate almost 0.5 mL of ethylene oxide would be allowed, but let's say it should be 0.1 mL since it will be respired quickly, not over the whole fifteen minute timespan. The point is that residual EtO

        • I'm going to assume VPHP doesn't do this either . . .

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
    • I wonder if something as simple as baking them for a few minutes at the lowest setting of an oven (175F/80C) would work for this virus.

      I've done that with ski gloves to eliminate stinky gym sock bacteria. It worked great for that, and didn't seem to have any adverse effect on the gloves.

      • by piojo ( 995934 )

        I wonder if something as simple as baking them for a few minutes at the lowest setting of an oven (175F/80C) would work for this virus.

        According to this study 80-90C would be fine for the mask, which is as important as whether it kills the virus:
        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... [nih.gov]

        But since an oven cannot maintain a constant temperature, you would need to put the items in an insulated box or a large thermal mass like a preheated dutch oven. And measure! Your oven's 80C could easily be 100C.

        The next questions are: is wet heat (tray of water in the oven) equally harmless to the mask? It should already be known and published whether wet heat kil

    • Dunking in Alcohol works, or did work until some weasel decided dotors and nurses were drinking the stuff an bitched about alcohol excise/taxes..Oh but what if a cigarette falls in.. .classis example of groupthinking while people die or financially raped in ICU. Steam can be very effective if doctors can lean to tie cloth tape bows/slipknots. Nah - they are not that smart. Why 10K Well that is another management flaw called Incremental decision making, often hand in hand with groupthink where they loose t
    • Also, how about Cobalt sterilization, or other radiological methods?

      Just take a pile down to Radiology, crank up the juice, wait a few minutes. Nothing lives.

      Perhaps the lab where they nuke patientâ(TM)s immune systems to treat out of control autoimmune conditions might be a place to start...

      Also, if Covid-induced Multiple-Organ-Failure (MSOF) is indeed caused by a Cytokine-storm released by a personâ(TM)s out of control immune system; why canâ(TM)t steroids or other immune-suppresive treatme

    • What about strong UVC lamps?
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • That's one chinese company. How about if we judge USA based on Monsanto? Bottom line: USA wants to poison you and steal your food.
      Facebook? Bottom Line: USA wants to spy on you and sell your data.
      Exxon? Bottom Line: USA wants to cover up climate change and pay world leaders to pretend it doesn't exist.

      That last one might actually be true.
      • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
        The masks have to work.
        Social media is an internet service.
        Climate change is not mask expected to work.
        An oil company is a company that works with oil and oil products.
        • Everybody is cutting corners to meet demand right now. When Elon's ventilators aren't perfect we will say "thanks for trying", but when a chinese mask is not perfect it's because they are sneaky.
      • Yes, Eastasia is a repressive state with a reputation for shoddy QC. Nonetheless, OPs deflection to China is pretty blatant. His first example is of masks not meeting quality standards: this probably means the material is not rigid enough, or too porous, or whatever--rather than a sterility issue. His second example, re unreliable tests, lacks any discernible connection to masks or sterilization (the subject of the article).

        American hospitals shouldn't be in the position of having to sterilize disposab
  • If you live in a dense city and are lucky enough to have masks, you might consider sterilizing your own masks. What are our options? I can think of:

    - Hydrogen peroxide vapor sterilization, as in this article. Requires a dehumidifier, an ultrasonic humidifier, and an outlet timer.
    - Wet pasteurization using a dutch oven/thermal ballast inside an oven (85-90C) (possibly harmful to the mask).
    - Dry pasteurization using a dutch oven/thermal ballast inside an oven (85-90C) (okay for the mask but possibly not effec

    • by piojo ( 995934 )

      It's come to my attention that while vapor H2O2 is okay, liquid H2O2 may not be. Alcohol solutions can degrade the electrostatic filtering employed by better masks. The current best recommendation is to heat at 70C for half an hour, but it's unclear how many times this can be done with no impact on mask effectiveness.

  • A research paper [box.com] from Stanford Medicine's AIM Lab shows that an N95 mask exposed to 70C (158F) of hot air for 30 minutes in an oven (not your home oven) can be disinfected enough for reuse.

    In summary bleach and microwaves were failures at point of care because the bleach gases (skin and respiratory irritants) remained after multiple strategies were used to remove them, the microwave melted the masks and soaking them first led to reduced filtration. EtO, UVGI, and hydrogen peroxide decontamination were s
    • Can one get enough UV from sunlight, say over 48 hours?

      • My thought also, what about intense UV exposure?? Not sunlight but using a UV bulb such as found in my whole house disinfectant unit for my well water?
      • I am not sure.

        I've been reading a lot about uv-c (band) and how its good for breaking down viruses ('deactivating').

        if you go to amazon, you'll see tons of uv-c lamps in glass/mercury and also LED. you can buy bare bulbs (I got some) and I'm looking to DIY some black boxes to disinfect masks and even received shipped items from mailorder.

        do not look at the uv-c and do not expose to skin! this is why they often come with timers or remote on/off switches.

        hack-a-day had an article on the uv sensor modules (a

  • Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has had enough of the FDA's dithering over approval of an innovative process that could get millions of N95 masks to hospitals and other healthcare facilities, where they are in critically short supply as the Chinese coronavirus continues to stretch their resources. "If this isn't cleared up by morning, I'm ready to sue the FDA," Yost wrote on his Facebook page on Sunday afternoon.

    "Here's the thing," Yost said, "if the technology is safe and works, there is no rational basis

    • I don't know why Ohio doesn't just tell the FDA to go pound sand and start doing what they need to do. It's always better to ask for forgiveness than permission, and I can't imagine the FDA could politically bring an enforcement action later given the circumstances.
  • A local company built a machine that is basically a conveyor belt with UV lamps on it, to be used for mask disinfection [kitchenertoday.com].

    It is the same lamp that is used in some HVAC systems.

    Seems to be much better than using chemicals, which may leave residues that are inhaled by those who reuse the mask.

    But is it effective? Does it have to be used on both sides? What about particles caught inside the material, and so on ...

What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey

Working...