Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Moon Space Technology

Private Russian Company Proposes Lunar Base 81

MarkWhittington writes According to an article in Sputnik, a private Russian company called Lin Industrial has announced that it is capable of building a lunar base. However, according to information contained to a recent post in Parabolic Arc, this announcement may be more the result of idle boasting than an objective assessment of actual ability. Nevertheless, Lin seems to be one of the few entrepreneurial startups in Russia in the style of much more robust enterprises in the West such as SpaceX and Blue Origin.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Private Russian Company Proposes Lunar Base

Comments Filter:
  • by Frosty Piss ( 770223 ) * on Thursday January 01, 2015 @07:11PM (#48713541)

    Random boasting from people unable to carry them out... Well, they better not build it where all those time-share lots have been sold...

    • then they are capable of bankruptcy and the modern gulag. Russian business is ebb and flow like that.

    • There are two kinds of people who announce they can do something like that - the ones who don't have a clue how hard it is, and the ones who don't care because their objective is to scam investors. (Seasteading's a lot easier, but most of the proposals I've seen for that have been the scammer types.)

      Yes, getting enough equipment up to the moon to build a moon base is something you can do if you've got enough cash. Doing it as a private industry (rather than a government doing it) means you also need a re

      • There are two kinds of people who announce they can do something like that - the ones who don't have a clue how hard it is, and the ones who don't care because their objective is to scam investors.

        So which one is Elon Musk? (I'm voting for Type I myself.)

        But building an ecosystem that can sustain your moon colony is really hard; we don't know how to keep small pilot projects like Biosphere II running for very long without cheating and restocking the atmosphere, or how to build dirt without a ready

        • by itzly ( 3699663 )

          don't use Biosphere II as an example. It never was a serious scientific experiment

          That has always made me wonder why nobody followed up on these projects with a rigorous scientific version. It seems we can learn plenty from it.

          • by Anonymous Coward

            The system was not capable of generating enough oxygen for the inhabitants, one of the people inside stated in an interview that it was painful to breath because there was so much CO2 in the atmosphere

            It was taken over by Columbia University in 1995, and they changed from an air tight system to a flow through system in 1996
            They continued to make studies on CO2 levels etc for a few years and it has recently been turned over to the University of Arizona who will continue to perform similar studies

            Any long ter

          • don't use Biosphere II as an example. It never was a serious scientific experiment

            That has always made me wonder why nobody followed up on these projects with a rigorous scientific version.

            There's been a variety of related and rigorous work - but unlike Biosphere II, they haven't been large and gaudy and thus haven't captured the media and the public's attention. That the more rigorous research has only lead to the conclusion that we don't currently actually know all that much rather than making sexy headl

      • by Optali ( 809880 )

        You forget that there is a third type of people doing such announcements:

        A bunch of Russian oligarchs during a Vodka orgy.

    • I'll bet there a bunch of companies capable of building a lunar base [as in, a facility capable of supporting life for a non-trivial amount of time on the surface of the moon]. Of course, none of them have any chance of actually getting the base to the moon.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I propose a private base on Venus!

    Look how easy that was!?

    • One you wont hear : I propose a private mission to Uranus !
      Well, maybe in San Francisco.

  • by K. S. Kyosuke ( 729550 ) on Thursday January 01, 2015 @07:20PM (#48713581)
    Ridiculous.
  • Call us back when you've at least orbited a space station or two...

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Call us back when you've at least orbited a space station or two...

      ...says the person who forgot what country put the first human in space.

  • me, too!1! (Score:5, Funny)

    by waynemcdougall ( 631415 ) <slashdot@codeworks.gen.nz> on Thursday January 01, 2015 @07:36PM (#48713643) Homepage

    I, too, am capable of building a lunar base.

    I just need some funding. And a rocket. And a team of trained engineers/astronauts (both, not either or).

    Rocket fuel, I guess. And plans. Plans would be good.

    But I am totally capable.

  • Whoever sets up the lunar base, do you mind also putting a Pirate Bay server up there, too? I never finished downloading the second season of Hannibal.

  • They couldn't even build a heavy booster back when the USSR was at the peak of its military and economic might. They sure as hell aren't capable of it now, with thieves and crooks running the country.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energia

      Launched two times, booster performed flawlessly each time (payload failed on first launch).

      • by melted ( 227442 )

        Still smaller than Saturn-V, with less payload capacity to both LEO and the Moon. Never flown with human payload. Never flown beyond LEO. Better luck next time.

    • by qpqp ( 1969898 )

      now, with thieves and crooks running the country.

      Wow, what a remarkably naive thing to think. Pray tell, when was Ru^H^Hany country not run by "thieves and crooks?"

  • In the style of SpaceX? So I suppose they're undercutting other traditional space launch companies and are on track to developing a a heavy lifter and other technologies they hope could get them to Mars?

    Wait, you're telling me they don't even have one rocket yet [community.sk.ru], never mind having actually achieved orbit, any sort of revenue, or even the beginnings of the capability of building, launching, landing, and assembling a moon base? Slashdot, why?

  • Russians had the most expensive olympic games in the history $50 Billion, while the living standard of the average russian, if measured by GDP per capita is probably 50% lower than average western country.

    Clearly, those who were part of it, liked the taste of the money and want more "projects". In US they would start a new war, or would bring another entitlement program aka "Obamacare". In EU they are playing with the LHC. Russians want to colonize the moon now that Ukrainians kicked their teeth in East Ukr

  • Why do we not have a moonbase yet, I want to know? I mean the Earth collectively.

    Robert Heinlein provided much of the philosophical legwork for how to make it work: Don't worry about building large reinforced airtight structures above ground, but instead bore into the ground and/or use caves that can be sealed up and fortified.

    i.e., live IN the moon not ON the moon

    So first you send up rockets with tunnel-boring moon machines, then you build hatches over the holes, then you seal up the leaks in th

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...