Team Use Stem Cells to Restore Mobility in Paralyzed Monkey 196
interval1066 writes "From the article: 'Japanese researchers said Wednesday they had used stem cells to restore partial mobility in a small monkey that had been paralysed from the neck down by a spinal injury.' This is huge news in the world of stem cell research; restoring some muscular control to a simian is a huge step. This means that stem cell therapy is a demonstrably viable path to restoring motility for millions of accident victims, palsy and ms sufferers, the list just goes on."
Re:Embryonic or adult? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Peer-Review v. Newspaper (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Induced pluripotent stem (Score:4, Insightful)
Not really. An embryo doesn't get to save a life before it's flushed down the drain.
Re:Induced pluripotent stem (Score:5, Insightful)
The cells used in this treatment were derived from adult skin cells. No controversy here. Everyone wins.
The fact that adult stem cells are useful should lead us to believe that embryonic stem cells are useful too. In this way any work on adult stem cells is linked to (the lack of) work on embryonic stem cells. If we can save lives with adult stem cells, what if we could save even more lives with embryonic stem cells? Shouldn't we at least do the research to find out?
Re:Induced pluripotent stem (Score:4, Insightful)
What controversy is there for anyone in the least bit educated?
Who opposes fertility treatments? If you do not oppose those why would you oppose the methods used to dispose of the left over embryos?
They were going in the garbage anyway.
Re:Embryonic or adult? (Score:2, Insightful)
Why do you care?
Do you oppose fertility treatments? If not, why do you care how they dispose of the left over material?