Police Called Over 11-Year-Old's Science Project 687
garg0yle writes "Police in San Diego were called to investigate an 11-year-old's science project, consisting of 'a motion detector made out of an empty Gatorade bottle and some electronics,' after the vice-principal came to the conclusion that it was a bomb. Charges aren't being laid against the youth, but it's being recommended that he and his family 'get counseling.' Apparently, the student violated school policies — I'm assuming these are policies against having any kind of independent thought?"
Re:I recommend ... (Score:5, Informative)
Just take a look at United Nuclear [unitednuclear.com] or this book [amazon.com] to see some serious science fair projects, and imagine how some of those would of went down for the poor kid!
another misleading summary (Score:5, Informative)
If you RTFA, it looks like the cops are saying that they should get counseling because the kid and parents were upset by the incident.
Regardless of whether the search was reasonable, do you realize how misled you (and many others, including those who've responded to you) have been by the summary's "scare quotes"? The summary makes it sounds like the kid is being sent in for "reprogramming".
I'm probably wasting my time typing this, because it won't change anything anyway. Slashdotters will primarily continue to curse the way the government misleads the citizens, then turn around and fall for this kind of crap.
Re:another misleading summary (Score:5, Informative)
I agree it's sort of hard to know one way or the other, but I think the author of the article is implying the student and parents need counseling so this sort of thing doesn't happen again. The article's statement about counseling was stated right after it discussed the fire officials searching the home for explosives. And, it was in the same paragraph that said the student wasn't going to be prosecuted, but violated school policies. The article does talk about the student and parents being upset, but that's a little later in the article.
Maybe the author of the article is misleading us, but (somewhat uncharacteristically) Slashdot's summary seems to be pretty accurate.
Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook (Score:5, Informative)
Nothing like 1984 (Score:2, Informative)
That's fucked up beyond 1984.
This is nothing like 1984. 1984 was about censorship and oppression, this is just paranoia. It probably happened due to a combination of the fear of terrorism and people's fear of technology they can't understand. Not they I don't think this both sad and slightly scary, but there are other things that can be wrong with society than trying to imitate 1984
If you REALLY want to let them know what you think (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the Contact Us page for Millennial Tech Middle School.
http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/contact/?rn=8783875 [mtechmiddle.org]
Maybe if enough people ask, they'll actually tell someone why they have a complete fucking moron in a position of scholastic authority over their kids.
Re:We're on our way! (Score:5, Informative)
Reading the article (I know, but someone has to :-) ) it seems that it wasn't a Science Fair project, it was just something the kid had been playing around with at home and then brought it in to show his friends. The kid violated school policies and that is why they said he should get counselling.
So the school has a policy banning kids from being inventive and wanting to show that inventiveness off. Anyway - thats one kid the school system has scared off technology - well done San Diego Unified School District.
Re:WTF? (Score:1, Informative)
woosh...
I'm pretty sure that's what the OP was implying
Protest To The School (Score:5, Informative)
Re:We're on our way! (Score:1, Informative)
The kid violated school policies and that is why they said he should get counselling.
I would suggest that he now needs counselling to get over the stress of this incident. Not counselling for violating school policies.
Re:School policy (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Principal should be fired for stupidity (Score:1, Informative)
This is a prime example of shifting responsibility or blame. The principal had the opportunity to get an explanation from the student and react rationally. He or she choose to push the panic button to pass off any decision making that could cause questions later by other idiot politically correct over reactionary people. So what do we see after all this? We see the principal do the usual dodge that those in positions of authority always do. He successfully pushed the blame over to this poor 11 year old student for this mess of over reaction the principal actually created. This is so typical of the problems we have today where those in a position of responsibility manage to pass the blame for being stupid onto some poor sap less able to defend themselves. This poor 11yr. old student had no real chance to defend himself from this and and it seems that it was agreed the best way to protect the authority of the school was to blame the kid for everything. It would seem his parents are less than capable in taking on the establishment to right this wrong than you would hope. This would be so wrong if this was a rational world. Unfortunately once again, we see it isn't.
Re:Article missing a critical detail. (Score:4, Informative)
Sure. I'll save you the read: there is nothing relevant in there.
http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=58810&type=d&termREC_ID=&pREC_ID=87933&hideMenu=1&rn=6634111 [mtechmiddle.org]
Their About Us/Mission and Vision Statement is a gas, though.
Re:We're on our way! (Score:3, Informative)
You can read them here [mtechmiddle.org]. If you can see where the kid violated school policy, I'd appreciate it if you could explain it to me.
Re:I recommend ... (Score:4, Informative)
I am sorry to tell you this guys but, you (USA) have lost the war against terrorism.
The Terrorists have won and brought your society to their knees.
Sorry.
Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook (Score:3, Informative)
You could share your thoughts with them [mtechmiddle.org]
The Principle and all involved (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I recommend ... (Score:1, Informative)
Those who can do,
those who can't teach,
and those who can't teach administrate.
--
Don't get me started.
Re:I recommend ... (Score:5, Informative)
Those who can do,
those who can't teach,
From every good teacher you ever had:
Fuck You.
In defense of Dylan Klebold (Score:3, Informative)
They may have students a lot like Dylan Klebold in their school, and don't know how to ensure that they don't go off the deep end, so they do the best they can.
Forensic analysis of the massacre concluded that it was orchestrated by Eric Harris, who was a clinical psychopath. Dylan Klebold was just a maladjusted doofus that Harris took along for the ride.
Re:I recommend ... (Score:4, Informative)
Funny thing is; had it indeed been a bomb, they would have been too late as it was already inside the building.
Re:I recommend ... (Score:2, Informative)