Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Displays Toys Science Technology

Bionic Contact Lens May Lead to Overlay Displays 213

pfman writes "A University of Washington researcher has developed a contact lens including circuitry and a matrix of LEDs. Although not yet a working prototype, this may be a foundation for terminator/robocop style overlay displays in which computer graphics could be superimposed on your normal vision. 'Building the lenses was a challenge because materials that are safe for use in the body, such as the flexible organic materials used in contact lenses, are delicate. Manufacturing electrical circuits, however, involves inorganic materials, scorching temperatures and toxic chemicals. Researchers built the circuits from layers of metal only a few nanometers thick, about one thousandth the width of a human hair, and constructed light-emitting diodes one third of a millimeter across.'" Kotaku notes that this has some obvious gaming implications.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bionic Contact Lens May Lead to Overlay Displays

Comments Filter:
  • Um, what? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by tgd ( 2822 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:44PM (#22084058)
    Someone needs to read a book on how the eye works.

    You only have receptor density for reading dead center in your eye. You can't put Terminator-style displays of to the side of your FOV, because you can only see motion and coarse detail off dead center.

  • Re:Um, what? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by webheaded ( 997188 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:46PM (#22084080) Homepage
    I highly doubt they planned putting the overlays anywhere but the center of the eye. If they're intelligent enough to make the thing, I'd have to assume they have someone there smart enough to tell them where it's going to work. ;)
  • by MrSteveSD ( 801820 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:47PM (#22084092)
    So how is it useful?
  • Two Questions: (Score:4, Insightful)

    by JesseL ( 107722 ) * on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:47PM (#22084106) Homepage Journal
    First: How are they envisioning powering a device like this?

    Second: It's my understanding that human vision requires continuous eye motion to maintain visual perception. Try holding your eyeball still by (gently) applying finger pressure to it through your eyelid. You'll notice after a few seconds that your field vision slowly shrinks into nothing. If an image moves in perfect sync with your eyeball, isn't your brain likely to stop seeing it after a short time?
  • by grumpyman ( 849537 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:53PM (#22084160)
    Isn't that safer? I don't want implanted chips or digital display in my body.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:56PM (#22084206)
    Hmmm.... eyeball mounted circuitry, and cops with Tasers... what could possibly go wrong?
  • Re:Um, what? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by graft ( 556969 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @03:57PM (#22084234) Homepage
    There are two orientations to consider: one is the orientation of your eyes, and the other the orientation of your face. You're right about the former, but for the latter you could easily place displays off to the side; you'd just have to look over to the left or right (eye-wise) to see 'em.
  • Out of focus (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Viadd ( 173388 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @04:22PM (#22084562)
    An LED at the surface of the eye's cornea/lens will flood the entire retina with light. It will appear as a red glare filling your field of view, and not as a little pixel of light. That is because the surface of the lens is out of focus, and so the wide angle light from the LED just spreads out.

    If it were an array of lasers with tight beams, then it could work, but you can't make small lasers produce tight beams(due to the diffraction limit) without additional optics that couldn't fit under the eyelid.
  • Re:yuck! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by brkello ( 642429 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @04:28PM (#22084648)
    Umm, you get over it like everyone else does when they have to wear contacts?
  • by jam244 ( 701505 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @04:35PM (#22084756) Homepage

    A lens containing microscopic pieces of metal next to my cornea. What could go wrong?
    They said the same thing about regular contact lenses too.
  • by TomRC ( 231027 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @04:38PM (#22084816)
    It's possible that they've thought of the issue of focusing the image.

    One possibility would be that the display would use tiny lasers, to project very narrow beams of light at just a small group of receptors on the retina.

    Different eye shapes/sizes would seem to make that difficult, but there's probably some way to do it, even if it means having to have "prescription" displays that match your eyes.
  • Re:Do the Math (Score:5, Insightful)

    by imgod2u ( 812837 ) on Thursday January 17, 2008 @04:52PM (#22085040) Homepage
    It wouldn't need to. The reason that focus is necessary is because the direction of incoming light rays are not aimed at the focal point for our light receptors. A display that is curved (and with LED's that emit light in the direction towards the natural center of the eye) would be a naturally focused image. In fact, one simply can't help *but* to focus on it.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...