Vote To Eliminate Leap Seconds 531
Mortimer.CA writes "As discussed on Slashdot previously, there is a proposal to remove leap seconds from UTC (nee 'Greenwich' time). It will be put to a vote to ITU member states during 2008, and if 70% agree, the leap second will be eliminated by 2013. There is some debate as to whether this change is a good or bad idea. The proposal calls for a 'leap-hour' in about 600 years, which nobody seems to believe is a good idea. One philosophical point opponents make is that the 'official' time on Earth should match the time of the sun and heavens."
Wait (Score:5, Funny)
Re:year 2612 bug anyone? (Score:2, Funny)
We can ignore the problem then too. Eventually, morning and evening will be on different days. We might just gain or lose a whole day. Heck, we can ignore the problem forever. We'll be off by a year, then a decade...
How many seconds was it already?
Chrono-noobs! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Metric time? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:year 2612 bug anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
This is why... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Metric time? (Score:5, Funny)
600 years? Who will remember? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Yup. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Metric time? (Score:5, Funny)
The smallest unit is the "Moment", and then the "While" (or, less used, the "Whilst"). A while is about 14.4 moments. Then you have the "long while", which is 13.8 whiles, then the "time", and "long time"...
For example, it took me a while and three moments to write this comment. I'm not a quick typer...
Steer the Earth (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Please take some care with editing... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A 'leap-hour' in about 600 years (Score:3, Funny)
Change time (Score:4, Funny)
Come on it's been nearly 2008 years since we had BC, it's time for a change !
Bam (Score:3, Funny)
Re:South. (Score:1, Funny)
not quite oblig. Simpsons quote (Score:3, Funny)
Re:If it ain't broke... (Score:2, Funny)
time clod insensitive, live some of in nonlinear us you!
Re:Wait (Score:4, Funny)
Re:year 2612 bug anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wait (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Please take some care with editing... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Your post - Bollocks (Score:2, Funny)
Or, why stop at 12? Just use your ten fingers to represent a binary number. Make sure you order the bits properly! We'd certainly end up a more dexterous population...
Re:Your post - Bollocks (Score:2, Funny)
Some numbers... (Score:5, Funny)
That would be an interesting transition period as people got used to indicating or recognizing the numbers 4 or 128...
Re:year 2612 bug anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wait (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Metric time? (Score:5, Funny)
My Favorite Reason (Score:3, Funny)
Won't somebody think of the sundials!? I mean, c'mon! Sundials are cool and important! And what about Stonehenge?
Actually, I'm in favor of keeping UT1 and TAI in sync. But not for the sundials
Re:Some numbers... (Score:5, Funny)
Take one hundred
Binary add thirty two
Fingers say fuck you