NASA's New Mission to the Moon 283
mattnyc99 writes "Popular Mechanics has a new, in-depth preview of NASA's Orion spacecraft, tracking the complex challenges facing the engineers of the CEV (which NASA chief Michael Griffin called 'Apollo on steroids') as America shifts its focus away from the Space Shuttle and back toward returning to the moon by 2020. After yesterday's long op-ed in the New York Times concerning NASA's about-face, Popular Mechanic's interview with Buzz Aldrin and podcast with Transterrestrial.com's Rand Simberg raise perhaps the most pressing questions here: Is it worth going back to the lunar surface? And will we actually stay there?"
it's a joke, people (Score:5, Funny)
What do you mean "going back"? That assumes we were there a first time.
Updated Technology (Score:5, Funny)
we smoke while we flip the bird (Score:5, Funny)
The boston police?
Re:Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
Wasn't sure if you knew that or not.
They fly around in the sky.
Yikes. (Score:4, Funny)
With apologies to Kennedy: (Score:4, Funny)
Sextant? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:With apologies to Kennedy: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Is it worth going back to the lunar surface? (Score:1, Funny)
I thought it was the giant leap...? But don't quote me on that.
Re:Is it worth going back to the lunar surface? (Score:4, Funny)
Couple of IFs:
Re:Is it worth going back to the lunar surface? (Score:3, Funny)
It'd get bigger! Result!
Re:Is it worth going back to the lunar surface? (Score:3, Funny)
Probably about as far as the inside surface of your space helmet. Ewww.