And bad for business, so the WSJ, who reported on the delusional small group of scientists, is pushing the idea that it was not a natural occurrence, but a leak from a Chines Lab, which we hypothetically have more control to mitigate.
For the most part infections, HIV, flu, mad cow, etc, has not been a human creation, but a natural evolution. People who want this to be the Chinese Virus for political reasons also need to have it be a human creation. There is little evidence of this and history tells us i
And bad for business, so the WSJ, who reported on the delusional small group of scientists
Take note kids. In this case It's a "delusional small group of scientists". In the case of climate change it's a "delusional small group of scientists".
As mentioned politics and money. Tobacco, for instance, was first subject to rigorous research in the late 19th century. Through the 20th century the negative health effects due to prolonged exposure became the consensus of the ethical science based medical community. That did not mean there were plenty of researchers who for a phalanx to protect the manufacturers from the lies of mainstream science. Some were delusional and truly believed, some merely took the grants fromTobacco companies and adjusted experiments and results to achieve the desired outcome.
The Virus is scary (Score:1)
For the most part infections, HIV, flu, mad cow, etc, has not been a human creation, but a natural evolution. People who want this to be the Chinese Virus for political reasons also need to have it be a human creation. There is little evidence of this and history tells us i
Intellectualism is scary (Score:0, Flamebait)
And bad for business, so the WSJ, who reported on the delusional small group of scientists
Take note kids. In this case It's a "delusional small group of scientists". In the case of climate change it's a "delusional small group of scientists".
Re:Intellectualism is scary (Score:2)