No evidence at all, says Xi, vigorously brushing his hands together while standing on a particularly lumpy rug.
China and their government is to blame for so many actual documented atrocities. I don't understand why people need to make up bullshit conspiracies as well. All it does is weaken the actual documented atrocities that really do occur by normalising the idea that everyone blames China for everything.
The 'lab origin' hypothesis presented by Dr. Redfield is not a conspiracy theory in my opinion. I mean, who conspired with whom? If anything, the CCP conspired to squash any legitimate investigation (to this day!) - and I don't think that's a theory, that's a fact.
The 'lab origin' hypothesis presented by Dr. Redfield is not a conspiracy theory in my opinion.
In my opinion global warming is a hoax and I even found some guy with Dr in his name that agrees with me. Unfortunately for me when my opinion and the *opinion* of one authority to whom I appeal goes against a widely held consensus I would feel incredibly stupid for having the opinion had I not seen an overwhelming amount of actual evidence. Otherwise people would label me a conspiracy nutbag.
I mean, who conspired with whom?
You don't need to conspire with someone to create a conspiracy. You need to conspire for the benefit of someone, and that benefit is known. There's a reason it was almost universally republicans pushing that conspiracy theory.
If anything, the CCP conspired to squash any legitimate investigation (to this day!) - and I don't think that's a theory, that's a fact.
And yet they've achieved no such thing as a legitimate investigation to the origins does not rely on you going around and questioning people capable of squashing the investigation on site. We determine origins of viruses through a large and diverse means. You can't cover up the origin of the virus any more than you can cover up who your father is if the lab has both yours and his DNA.
Fortunately your opinion is meaningless. People who believe conspiracy theories are always of the opinion that it's not a conspiracy theory.
The 'lab origin' hypothesis presented by Dr. Redfield is not a conspiracy theory in my opinion.
In my opinion global warming is a hoax and I even found some guy with Dr in his name that agrees with me. Unfortunately for me when my opinion and the *opinion* of one authority to whom I appeal goes against a widely held consensus I would feel incredibly stupid for having the opinion had I not seen an overwhelming amount of actual evidence. Otherwise people would label me a conspiracy nutbag.
Not sure what you mean by this. Are you equivocating a belief that global warming is a hoax and a belief that a WIV lab leak is quite possible? That's a stretch.
I mean, who conspired with whom?
You don't need to conspire with someone to create a conspiracy. You need to conspire for the benefit of someone, and that benefit is known. There's a reason it was almost universally republicans pushing that conspiracy theory.
I think a great number of United States citizens suspect it was a leak from the WIV, it's not a republican/democrat thing. I suspect that you are not a United States citizen.
If anything, the CCP conspired to squash any legitimate investigation (to this day!) - and I don't think that's a theory, that's a fact.
And yet they've achieved no such thing as a legitimate investigation to the origins does not rely on you going around and questioning people capable of squashing the investigation on site. We determine origins of viruses through a large and diverse means. You can't cover up the origin of the virus any more than you can cover up who your father is if the lab has both yours and his DNA.
Yeah, the problem is we don't know what virus DNA the WIV has, the CCP is blocking access.
"Now here's something you're really going to like!"
-- Rocket J. Squirrel
'No Evidence' says Xi (Score:2, Insightful)
No evidence at all, says Xi, vigorously brushing his hands together while standing on a particularly lumpy rug.
Re: (Score:5, Insightful)
No evidence at all, says Xi, vigorously brushing his hands together while standing on a particularly lumpy rug.
China and their government is to blame for so many actual documented atrocities. I don't understand why people need to make up bullshit conspiracies as well. All it does is weaken the actual documented atrocities that really do occur by normalising the idea that everyone blames China for everything.
The "narrative" becomes counter to its own goals.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:'No Evidence' says Xi (Score:3)
The 'lab origin' hypothesis presented by Dr. Redfield is not a conspiracy theory in my opinion.
In my opinion global warming is a hoax and I even found some guy with Dr in his name that agrees with me. Unfortunately for me when my opinion and the *opinion* of one authority to whom I appeal goes against a widely held consensus I would feel incredibly stupid for having the opinion had I not seen an overwhelming amount of actual evidence. Otherwise people would label me a conspiracy nutbag.
I mean, who conspired with whom?
You don't need to conspire with someone to create a conspiracy. You need to conspire for the benefit of someone, and that benefit is known. There's a reason it was almost universally republicans pushing that conspiracy theory.
If anything, the CCP conspired to squash any legitimate investigation (to this day!) - and I don't think that's a theory, that's a fact.
And yet they've achieved no such thing as a legitimate investigation to the origins does not rely on you going around and questioning people capable of squashing the investigation on site. We determine origins of viruses through a large and diverse means. You can't cover up the origin of the virus any more than you can cover up who your father is if the lab has both yours and his DNA.
Fortunately your opinion is meaningless. People who believe conspiracy theories are always of the opinion that it's not a conspiracy theory.
Re: (Score:1)
The 'lab origin' hypothesis presented by Dr. Redfield is not a conspiracy theory in my opinion.
In my opinion global warming is a hoax and I even found some guy with Dr in his name that agrees with me. Unfortunately for me when my opinion and the *opinion* of one authority to whom I appeal goes against a widely held consensus I would feel incredibly stupid for having the opinion had I not seen an overwhelming amount of actual evidence. Otherwise people would label me a conspiracy nutbag.
Not sure what you mean by this. Are you equivocating a belief that global warming is a hoax and a belief that a WIV lab leak is quite possible? That's a stretch.
I mean, who conspired with whom?
You don't need to conspire with someone to create a conspiracy. You need to conspire for the benefit of someone, and that benefit is known. There's a reason it was almost universally republicans pushing that conspiracy theory.
I think a great number of United States citizens suspect it was a leak from the WIV, it's not a republican/democrat thing. I suspect that you are not a United States citizen.
If anything, the CCP conspired to squash any legitimate investigation (to this day!) - and I don't think that's a theory, that's a fact.
And yet they've achieved no such thing as a legitimate investigation to the origins does not rely on you going around and questioning people capable of squashing the investigation on site. We determine origins of viruses through a large and diverse means. You can't cover up the origin of the virus any more than you can cover up who your father is if the lab has both yours and his DNA.
Yeah, the problem is we don't know what virus DNA the WIV has, the CCP is blocking access.