Of course the press has to politicize this and make it into a "narrative" of some kind. Meanwhile, people who actually know what they're doing are waiting until the facts have been examined:
The current CDC director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, said at Friday's briefing that she didn't "have any indication for or against" the hypotheses and that the White House team is "looking forward" to a report from the World Health Organization that "examines the origin of this pandemic and of SARS-CoV-2 in humans."
Of course the press has to politicize this and make it into a "narrative" of some kind. Meanwhile, people who actually know what they're doing are waiting until the facts have been examined:
The current CDC director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, said at Friday's briefing that she didn't "have any indication for or against" the hypotheses and that the White House team is "looking forward" to a report from the World Health Organization that "examines the origin of this pandemic and of SARS-CoV-2 in humans."
I ask you, if someone claims that there's "no evidence" of something before a study is even done about it, then what ought that to tell you about that person?
Typical politicization of Teh Science (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course the press has to politicize this and make it into a "narrative" of some kind. Meanwhile, people who actually know what they're doing are waiting until the facts have been examined:
I ask you
Re:Typical politicization of Teh Science (Score:2)
Of course the press has to politicize this and make it into a "narrative" of some kind. Meanwhile, people who actually know what they're doing are waiting until the facts have been examined:
I ask you, if someone claims that there's "no evidence" of something before a study is even done about it, then what ought that to tell you about that person?
No studies have been made? GTFO.