You know: To hide bad studies like you'd hide bad whateveritwas that Goldman Sachs rebundled, sold, didn't see others re-bunde, and bought back, shooting itself in the foot.;)
I get what you getting at. But, what a proper meta study does is summarize findings (i.e. people don't have the time to read/find/every/ paper in a field) or combine statistically insignificant studies (e.g. case studies) into something statistically significant (i.e. useful).
Meta-studies always seemed like re-bundling to me. (Score:3)
You know: To hide bad studies like you'd hide bad whateveritwas that Goldman Sachs rebundled, sold, didn't see others re-bunde, and bought back, shooting itself in the foot. ;)
Re:Meta-studies always seemed like re-bundling to (Score:1)
I get what you getting at. But, what a proper meta study does is summarize findings (i.e. people don't have the time to read/find /every/ paper in a field) or combine statistically insignificant studies (e.g. case studies) into something statistically significant (i.e. useful).