This is a perfect example of peer review and open publication doing it's job. It's one of the main reasons why modern western science, as it's practiced nowadays, is pretty much the gold standard in terms of factual information. Nothing else even comes close.
Note to climate deniers: this scientific process is coalescing against you. In a decade or two, you will be viewed as flat-earthers.
Note to the Chinese government and scientific establishment: You crave the legitimacy that western-style scient
peer review doing it's job (Score:2)
Note to climate deniers: this scientific process is coalescing against you. In a decade or two, you will be viewed as flat-earthers.
Note to the Chinese government and scientific establishment: You crave the legitimacy that western-style scient
Re:peer review doing it's job (Score:2)
Note to climate deniers: this scientific process is coalescing against you. In a decade or two, you will be viewed as flat-earthers.
You're more than a decade behind here. The science already coalesced, got challenged repeatedly by the deniers, who had their assertions proven false.