Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Comments: 1 +-   Dark Energy not necessary after all?-> on Friday December 28 2007, @10:33PM ttnuagmada

Submitted by ttnuagmada on Friday December 28 2007, @10:33PM
space
ttnuagmada writes "'Dark energy', which researchers have spent years trying to fathom, isn't necessary to explain our universe after all, according to a new solution to Einstein's theory of general relativity. This challenges the notion that dark energy makes up 76% of our universe, as many cosmologists believe."
Link to Original Source
submission

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Well, one of the problems with applying Einstein's general theory to cosmological problems is that the textbook version really doesn't work very well in that context. Einstein's implementation of a general theory was devised around the assumption that it'd have to reduce to special relativity over small regions, and as a result, it tends to come with some additional baggage that doesn't really work in the context of modern cosmology.

    Einstein originally constructed his general theory around the assumption

Do the words need changing?