Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Does lab equipment take on a mind of its own to trick scientists?->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "In a newly published paper, MIT researchers propose an experiment that may close the last major loophole of Bell’s inequality. The test is to see whether, as far-fetched as it sounds, a particle detector’s settings conspire with events in the shared past to determine which properties of a particle to measure — a scenario that implies that a physicist running the experiment does not have complete free will in choosing each detector’s setting. The test involves quasars, telescopes and lots of deep, deep space, and was published this week in the journal Physical Review Letters."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Does lab equipment take on a mind of its own to trick scientists?

Comments Filter:

FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A firefly is not a fly, but a beetle.

Working...