Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Troll complaint dismissed; subscriber not necessarily infringer->

Submitted by
NewYorkCountryLawyer
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The courts are finally starting to get it, that the subscriber to an internet access account which has been used for a copyright infringement is not necessarily the infringer. In AF Holdings v. Rogers, a case in the Southern District of California, the Chief Judge of the Court has granted a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim where the only evidence the plaintiff has against defendant is that defendant appears to have been the subscriber to the internet access account in question. In his 7-page opinion (PDF), Chief Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz noted that "just because an IP address is registered to an individual does not mean that he or she is guilty of infringement when that IP address is used to commit infringing activity"."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Troll complaint dismissed; subscriber not necessarily infringer

Comments Filter:

"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics

Working...