Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Researcher reverse-engineers pacemaker transmitter to deliver deadly shocks

Comments Filter:
  • From TFA:

    In a video demonstration, which Jack declined to release publicly because it may reveal the name of the manufacturer, ...

    Instead of hiding the name of the pacemaker manufacturer, that Jack guy should revealed it.

    The benefit of revealing the information far out-weight security via obfuscation - thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people may have this type of pacemaker inside their body and they have the right to know what's coming !

    By revealing the name, the patients would have a chance to replace their pacemaker with a different (and hopefully, more secure) type.

    Jack said his goal was not to cause harm, but to help manufacturers secure their devices.

    This "Jack" guy might be a hack

  • by sjames (1099)

    Much worse, the hack allows for new firmware to be uploaded. Imagine if at some date a few years from now, everyone with an insecure pacemaker drops over dead and then the firmware wipes itself.

Human resources are human first, and resources second. -- J. Garbers

Working...