Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Slashdot Deals: Prep for the CompTIA A+ certification exam. Save 95% on the CompTIA IT Certification Bundle ×
Science

Submission + - Confusion and Criticism over ENCODE's Claims-> 1

As_I_Please writes: In response to the previous report of the ENCODE project discovering "biochemical functions for 80 percent of the genome," many scientists have questioned what was meant by "function." Ars Technica Science Editor John Timmer wrote an article calling ENCODE's definition of functionality "broad to the point of being meaningless. At worst, it was actively misleading." Nature magazine also has a followup discussing the ambiguity surrounding the 80% figure and claims about junk DNA.
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Confusion and Criticism over ENCODE's Claims

Comments Filter:

When a fellow says, "It ain't the money but the principle of the thing," it's the money. -- Kim Hubbard

Working...