Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Submission + - Confusion and Criticism over ENCODE's Claims ( 1

As_I_Please writes: In response to the previous report of the ENCODE project discovering "biochemical functions for 80 percent of the genome," many scientists have questioned what was meant by "function." Ars Technica Science Editor John Timmer wrote an article calling ENCODE's definition of functionality "broad to the point of being meaningless. At worst, it was actively misleading." Nature magazine also has a followup discussing the ambiguity surrounding the 80% figure and claims about junk DNA.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Confusion and Criticism over ENCODE's Claims

Comments Filter:

"Lead us in a few words of silent prayer." -- Bill Peterson, former Houston Oiler football coach