Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Software

+ - Debunking the "Google Tax"-> 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft recently upped the war of words over which cloud platform is the best for business, with a TechNet blog claiming that Google Apps lacks basic functions and that users have to pay extra — a Google “tax” — to make Google Apps “enterprise-ready”. From one perspective Microsoft has a valid point. If you wanted all the features of Microsoft’s cloud software, Office 365, you would need to add more elements to bring the cheaper Google Apps up to measure. But Microsoft needs to be careful about calling names. As this article explains, while it is true that some features may cost extra in Google Apps, the same is true of Microsoft. Small businesses receive a restricted version of the Microsoft cloud and the full feature set is only available for more than four times the cost of a Google Apps licence."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Debunking the "Google Tax"

Comments Filter:

fortune: cpu time/usefulness ratio too high -- core dumped.

Working...