Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - US Army Has First Test Flight of Mach 6 Weapon-> 2

Submitted by
Stirling Newberry
Stirling Newberry writes "In a terse press release the US Department of Defense announced the first test of the the AHW, which uses rockets to launch and then glides to its target, in a manner similar to the Space Shuttle's re-entry. Earlier ABC News posted a story with animation video of the concept. Over at DefenseTech they argue that the trajectory being different from an ICBM is meant to show that it is not a first strike, but even the comments don't think that explanation flies.

More likely it is the speed of deployment, the ability to strike targets without going high enough to be seen by many advance warning radars, and without using nuclear warheads makes it a precision surprise attack weapon, a kind of super cruise missile for surprise asymetric attacks."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Army Has First Test Flight of Mach 6 Weapon

Comments Filter:
  • Wonder if it could be done smaller scale, deliver other kinds of things, and use some soft of fixed ground-based launching structure.

    • This is a question that has been asked before: how flexible is this as a delivery device? Could it be used to transport people or objects extremely quickly? Or is it just brute force technology that might be useful for individual missions, but which doesn't scale up. Given the boosters, it looks far more as if mobile launch applications would have to have small payloads, where as larger vehicles would have prohibitively expensive and risk prone rockets.

      Personally, I prefer solutions that involve mid fligh

Computers can figure out all kinds of problems, except the things in the world that just don't add up.