Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Mars is not the best place to look for life-> 1

Submitted by EccentricAnomaly
EccentricAnomaly (451326) writes "A story over at Science News quotes Alan Stern (former head of NASA Science missions) as saying: "The three strongest candidates [for extraterrestrial life] are all in the outer solar system" He's referring to Europa, Titan, and Enceladus. So why is NASA spending $2.5B on the next Mars Rover and planning to spend over $6B more on a Mars sample return when it can't find the money for much cheaper missions to Europa or Enceladus?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mars is not the best place to look for life

Comments Filter:
  • ... under the streetlight?

    Because that's where the light was!

    Looking for life on Mars has some of that element. Getting to Mars is cheaper (and a lot faster not requiring any fuel saving, time consuming gravity assists) than the outer solar system. We also know how to land on dirt, drive on dirt and scrape up dirt; we have no idea how to land on ice in vacuum (will it cause the ice to "geyser" or some other phenomenon), drill through (steel hard) ice and then perhaps send an autonomous submersible under k

Theory is gray, but the golden tree of life is green. -- Goethe