Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Space

+ - James Webb Space Telescopes Cost is Astronomical->

Submitted by digitaldc
digitaldc (879047) writes "The scale of the delay and cost overrun blighting Nasa's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has been laid bare by a panel called in to review the project. The group believes the final budget for Hubble's successor is likely to climb to at least $6.5bn, for a launch that is possible in September 2015. But even this assessment is optimistic, say the panel members. The head of the US space agency has accepted that "cost performance and coordination have been lacking". Charles Bolden has ordered a reorganisation of the project and has changed the management at its top.

Whereas Hubble (space telescope) sees the Universe mostly in visible light, JWST will observe the cosmos at longer wavelengths, in the infrared. It will see deeper into space and further back in time, to the very first population of stars."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

James Webb Space Telescopes Cost is Astronomical

Comments Filter:

An inclined plane is a slope up. -- Willard Espy, "An Almanac of Words at Play"

Working...