Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

+ - Why Geim never patented graphene->

Submitted by gbrumfiel
gbrumfiel writes: Andre Geim won this year's Nobel prize in physics for graphene, but he never patented it. In an interview with Nature News, he explains why

We considered patenting; we prepared a patent and it was nearly filed. Then I had an interaction with a big, multinational electronics company. I approached a guy at a conference and said, "We've got this patent coming up, would you be interested in sponsoring it over the years?" It's quite expensive to keep a patent alive for 20 years. The guy told me, "We are looking at graphene, and it might have a future in the long term. If after ten years we find it's really as good as it promises, we will put a hundred patent lawyers on it to write a hundred patents a day, and you will spend the rest of your life, and the gross domestic product of your little island, suing us." That's a direct quote.


Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why Geim never patented graphene

Comments Filter:

System going down at 1:45 this afternoon for disk crashing.

Working...