Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

+ - Why Geim never patented graphene->

Submitted by gbrumfiel
gbrumfiel (1917934) writes "Andre Geim won this year's Nobel prize in physics for graphene, but he never patented it. In an interview with Nature News, he explains why

We considered patenting; we prepared a patent and it was nearly filed. Then I had an interaction with a big, multinational electronics company. I approached a guy at a conference and said, "We've got this patent coming up, would you be interested in sponsoring it over the years?" It's quite expensive to keep a patent alive for 20 years. The guy told me, "We are looking at graphene, and it might have a future in the long term. If after ten years we find it's really as good as it promises, we will put a hundred patent lawyers on it to write a hundred patents a day, and you will spend the rest of your life, and the gross domestic product of your little island, suing us." That's a direct quote.

"

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why Geim never patented graphene

Comments Filter:

%DCL-MEM-BAD, bad memory VMS-F-PDGERS, pudding between the ears

Working...