Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Biotech

+ - Patents on synthetic life "Exteremely Damaging"->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Pioneer and veteran of genimocs, Professor John Sulston, is extremely concerned about the patent application on the first "Synthetic lifeform". The patents were filed by the Venter Institute following the announcement of the first life-form to have a synthetic genome (as reported here on slashdot http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/05/20/1839209/Synthetic-Genome-Drives-Bacterial-Cell?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot) ). Sulston claims the patent is excessively broad and would stifle research and development in the field by creating an effective monopoly on synthetic life and related molecular techniques.
Prof. Sulston has previously locked horns with Dr Craig Venter (of the eponymous Venter institute) over intellectual property issues surrounding the human genome project ten years ago. Fortunately Sulston won the last round and the HGP is freely accessible — Venter had wanted to charge for access just as he now wishes to make "synthetic life" proprietary."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Patents on synthetic life "Exteremely Damaging"

Comments Filter:

Don't be irreplaceable, if you can't be replaced, you can't be promoted.

Working...