Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

Submission + - Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results->

SilverTooth writes: Often, when watching a science documentary or reading an article, it seems that the scientists were executing a well-laid out plan that led to their discovery. Anyone familiar with the process of scientific discovery realizes that is a far cry from reality. Scientific discovery is fraught with false starts and blind alleys. As a result, labs accumulate vast amounts of valuable knowledge on what not to do, and what does not work. Trouble is, this knowledge is not shared using the usual method of scientific communication: the peer-reviewed article. It remains within the lab, or at the most shared informally among close colleagues. As it stands, the scientific culture discourages sharing negative results. Byte Size Biology reports on a forthcoming journal whose aim is to change this: the Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results. Hopefully, scientists will be able to better share and learn more from each other's experience and mistakes.
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results

Comments Filter:

Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts -- for support rather than illumination.

Working...