Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - NASA's cashflow problem puts moon trip in doubt 1

Submitted by krou
krou (1027572) writes "According to the Guardian, a panel of experts and former astronauts appointed by Barack Obama, and led by retired Lockheed Martin chairman Norman Augustine, is going to state that there is simply no money to go back to the moon, and the next-generation Ares I rocket is likely to be scrapped unless there is more funding. The $81bn Constellation Program's long-term goal of putting a human on Mars is almost certainly not going to be possible by the middle of the century. The options outlined by the panel for the future of Nasa "are to extend the working life of the ageing space shuttle fleet beyond next year's scheduled retirement until 2015, while developing a cheaper transport to the moon; pressing ahead with Constellation as quickly as existing funding allows; or creating a new, larger rocket that would allow exploration of the solar system while bypassing the moon." All of this means that Nasa won't be back on the moon before the end of the next decade as hoped, "or even leaving lower Earth orbit for at least another two decades". Another result of the monetary black hole is that they don't have the "$300m to expand a network of telescopes and meet the government's target of identifying, by 2020, at least 90% of the giant space rocks that pose a threat to Earth"."
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NASA's cashflow problem puts moon trip in doubt

Comments Filter:
  • It is a really sad situation, while I do realize that the space program is extremely expensive I believe the future return on investment is well worth the resources. Humans are natural explorers, it is in our blood to find out the unknown and I think we are at our best and joined together when working towards that goal. I know that people do not take the space launches and such as serous as they once did and a lot of excite for the space program has fizzled, but I believe that is because we stopped pushing

It is the quality rather than the quantity that matters. - Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 B.C. - A.D. 65)