![Mars Mars](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/mars_64.png)
![NASA NASA](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/nasa_64.png)
![The Almighty Buck The Almighty Buck](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/money_64.png)
NASA Will Award You $5,000 For Your Finest Mars City Idea 156
coondoggie writes with this snippet from Network World: NASA this week said it would look to the public for cool ideas on how to build a sustainable environment on Mars with the best plan earning as much as $5,000. With the Journey to Mars Challenge, NASA wants applicants to describe one or more Mars surface systems or capabilities and operations that are needed to set up and establish a technically achievable, economically sustainable human living space on the red planet. Think air, water, food, communications systems and the like.
Timing? Coincidence? (Score:2)
That a week ago KSP went out of Beta?
Time to check whether the base mods have been updated yet.
Planetary magnetic field generator (Score:2)
Where's my $5K?
Re: (Score:1)
Where's my $5K?
On Mars.
Re: (Score:2)
Where's my $5K?
On Mars.
But only after you stay for 10 years will they let you cash the check they had JPL put inside Spirit....
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
To receive it, you have to spend at least one night in the manor!
Dude... i don't know if you mean what i think that you mean,,, but i am Greek... i don't know what you think about us Greeks (don't believe the barbarous lies), but i will decline the offer... blame your pseudonym!
Re: (Score:1)
Surely it is in Greece!
I start to like you - why don't you sign up for a Slashdot account? You already have one? Well, use it!
Re: (Score:1)
You gotta make the core hot and turn it into liquid so it spins. You might need a battery to excite the coil.
Re: (Score:2)
Superconducting coil around the equator power by solar panels seems feasible.
Re: (Score:1)
Heh, maybe in 500 years...
Re: (Score:2)
Well it seems sort of plausible.
Re: (Score:2)
It does not have to be a one-turn coil, 350 turns would require only a MA of current, or only about 10000 times more than a big car starter motor uses! :)
Paul B.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The static energy / current requirements seem plausible, but that may only be a small part of the picture. Any conductor moving in that feild - vehicles, people, ions from solar wind - will then generate an EMF and dissipate energy in the process.
Re: (Score:2)
I did the calculation to show that it was a silly idea (need ca
Re: (Score:2)
Could you somehow use solar wind itself to induce the current that produces the field that repels it? That kind of shield would be very useful for manned spacecraft.
Re: (Score:2)
You gotta make the core hot and turn it into liquid so it spins. You might need a battery to excite the coil.
Battery? No, what we need are nukes, a subterranean (submarsean?) vehicle that can travel to the core to place them, and a team of misfit heroes.
Re: (Score:2)
Get Aaron Eckhart on the phone, stat!
Re: (Score:2)
We can't leave a mission of such important to misfits. This clearly requires politicians, lobbyists and corporate executives.
Re: (Score:2)
"as much as" a whole $5K? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
lol - that was my first thought. Add a zero and it might be worth some actual thought.
Simple (Score:3, Insightful)
Build the city on earth instead. Breathable atmosphere, easy resupply missions, plenty of water.
Re: (Score:3)
Even easier... Change the name of an existing city to "Mars" and you are done...
Oh yea, "I came home from Mars just last week.".. Or, "I'm going to Mars to live for the next 10 years."
Re: (Score:2)
Even easier... Change the name of an existing city to "Mars" and you are done...
Oh yea, "I came home from Mars just last week.".. Or, "I'm going to Mars to live for the next 10 years."
You're a litte bit too late for that: Mars, PA [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Even easier, just change the name of a train station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
ghost towns are cooler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Build the city on earth instead. Breathable atmosphere...
Not for long [softpedia-static.com]
For me to poop in [theneweconomy.com]
And, you know, there's this [rottentomatoes.com]. Mars is a warehouse, who wants to live in a warehouse? Let Amazon handle it, with Huey, Dewey, and Louie...
Re: (Score:1)
You are a cow. A cow says moo. MOOOOOOO! Moooooooo! Mooo cow moooooo! YOU COW!
Re: (Score:2)
Until that extinction level event rock comes cruising along and wipes out humanity because of the whole "all our eggs in one basket" thing....
Re: (Score:2)
Build an underground shelter, with sufficient supplies to last until the dust settles. Much cheaper, and much higher chance of survival.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU1QPtOZQZU
Where should we build it? On the part of the continent that gets flattened by the impact, or the continent that gets turned to lava by the thermal shock? If you can build something that would allow a breeding population of humans to survive something even a fraction as bad as that I think it'll be far more expensive than a Mars colony.
Re: (Score:2)
Build a couple, spread out over the earth. Keep in mind that small mammals were able to survive the previous huge impact by digging a hole in the ground with their paws. I'm sure we can do better than that.
Re: (Score:3)
They were able to survive *some* of the huge impacts. There were a few, including the one that created the moon that would not be survivable by any digging. But it's not just impacts. There are a whole host of other disasters that could take out a one planet humanity.
Re: (Score:2)
There were a few, including the one that created the moon that would not be survivable by any digging.
That was a small planet, and it's gone now.
There are a whole host of other disasters that could take out a one planet humanity.
There are at least 100 times as many that can take out a fragile settlement on Mars, so by building such a place, you've increased the odds of humanity's survival by 1%. It's not worth the trouble.
Re: (Score:2)
So if you came down with cancer and the treatment had a 1% success rate you'd just not bother?
No offense, but Stephen Hawking thinks it's worth the bother, and some guy on Slashdot named itzly doesn't. I'm going to go with Hawking's recommendation
http://www.space.com/8924-stephen-hawking-humanity-won-survive-leaving-earth.html
Re: (Score:2)
Build an underground shelter, with sufficient supplies to last until the dust settles. Much cheaper, and much higher chance of survival.
This is a good plan. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plantlife. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. Selecting survivors need not be difficult -- a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills.
Naturally, they would breed prodigiously; there would be much time, and little to do. And, with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females
Re: (Score:2)
Watch out for those nubile females, they want our fluids!
Re: (Score:2)
Naturally, they would breed prodigiously; there would be much time, and little to do. And, with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, society could be rebuilt. Though since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.
Apart from not mentioning beer, your argument seems compelling.
Re: (Score:2)
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. —H. L. Mencken
$5k??? Really, NASA? (Score:3)
It occurs to me that a feasable plan for a sustainable mars colony is worth a *HECK* of a lot more than just $5K....
Try increasing that by *AT LEAST* a couple of orders of magnitude.
Offering only $5K for a practical idea that once successfully implemented is going to be quite frankly worth trillions of dollars is really undervaluing the significance of coming up with a workable plan in the first place.
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, really, I won't even change a lightbulb without getting a signed contract.
Re: (Score:3)
I never change lightbulbs because it's a hardware problem, and I'm a software guy.
Re: $5k??? Really, NASA? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That's still better than the market rate of $0.10 for 12 ideas. In fact, you'd probably go bankrupt if you offered that rate, which is why they're limiting it to the top 3 ideas only.
Presumably the plan here is to not overlook anything "obvious" that their experts somehow didn't think of. Obviously, the actual plans in full detail will be developed by the experts.
Re: (Score:2)
Offering only $5K for a practical idea
Well, the probably had a big budget increase!
Re: (Score:3)
Don't worry, they're not actually looking for ideas. They have tons of ideas. They have people whose whole job is to come up with ideas. They have an army of very knowledgeable volunteers in groups like The Planetary Society who'd write detailed thousand-page treatises on solid waste recycling on Mars, in exchange for just knowing that the human race has an off-world outpost. They're not l
Re: (Score:2)
worth a *HECK* of a lot more than just $5K....
Don't be greedy, that's half the NASA budget for 2015.
Egg hatcheries (Score:1)
Barsoom always needs more egg hatcheries. And air generation stations along the canals.
Ceres better than Mars (Score:2)
Easier to get to, less radiation (but enough for solar panels to work), lots of water, no huge gravity well to surmount when coming home.
Re: (Score:2)
Ceres has 1/10 the gravity of our Moon... why go to Ceres vice our own Moon?
Re: (Score:2)
Water and Nitrogen...pending Dawn Confirmation.
Re: (Score:2)
2.8% of Earth's gravity might be a little bit difficult to get used to.
Surface? (Score:5, Insightful)
My first idea is to dig in. Put the people underground, as much as possible. Put critical infrastructure underground as well. No matter how you build, or what you build with, surface structures are going to be vulnerable. Put greenhouses on the surface, put solar panels on the surface, put hazardous research and fabrication on the surface. Put the PEOPLE underground. Dig them in where they can sleep soundly, knowing that they are safe from piddling little things like storms, or meteors, or whatever.
Re: (Score:2)
What's the point of going to Mars and then live underground ? You can dig a hole right here, if you want.
Re: (Score:2)
If someone can build an underground city on Mars, they surely can bring a nuke.
But even so, a Mars city is never going to be 100% self sustaining. At some point in time, they're going to run out of something essential that needs to come from earth.
Re: (Score:2)
What makes you way that? If we can put a rover within 100 meters of where we wanted to, we can put a nuke there.
Re: (Score:2)
So you want to put the people underground where they'll be safe, and their source of food and fresh air (the greenhouses) where they're going to be, as you yourself say, vulnerable.
The greenhouses need to be underground as well. So does the power generation, which means a fusion plant. Good thing they're only 20 years away, just like they were 20 years ago.
Re: (Score:3)
So you want to put the people underground where they'll be safe, and their source of food and fresh air (the greenhouses) where they're going to be, as you yourself say, vulnerable.
The greenhouses need to be underground as well. So does the power generation, which means a fusion plant. Good thing they're only 20 years away, just like they were 20 years ago.
You can put greenhouses above ground. Just make sure you have an underground failsafe and enough emergency reserves to make it through a disaster.
Even then it's probably not feasible. Look how expensive it is to go underground on earth, now consider how tough it will be on Mars when you're walking around in spacesuits and have to transport heavy duty excavation and construction equipment from earth.
More likely just put everything above ground and distributed. If an asteroid takes out a greenhouse or a house
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't think "underground", but soil-sheltered. There is no need for subway-tunnel construction when all you need is a radiation shield. And besides, the lower gravitation (3.711 m/s vs 9.81) makes it easier to haul rocks and dirt.
Re: (Score:2)
Keep the greenhouses on the surface, so they can use the existing fusion plant.
Re: (Score:2)
Develop a drilling or excavation machine that can operate mostly autonomously (ideally, using something like industrial lasers to avoid mechanical wear on the drilling apparatus) and send one or more to Mars several years/decades ahead of when you want to send the humans. Have them drill at a downward angle into the side of a crater, and once you've gone sufficiently far then start having them dig or drill to the side. Ideally, by the time the colonists reach Mars all they need to do is install airlocks at
Re: (Score:2)
There may be some leaks but hopefully the colonists can make some sort of cement out of the Martian dirt to plug them.
Lucky you covered that last point, I was getting worried your plan was insanely risky.
It'll take a lot more than $5000 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You are a self-centered egoist and egocentric guy... blocking all humanity for a few bucks... you insensitive clod!
Just recycle an existing city (Score:1)
I am quite sure with just a few reforms, some of the underground cities used by Martians in the past can be put back into shape - there seems to be too few inhabitants left around there to claim for the vast urban infrastructure that should have been in place back them.
Re: (Score:2)
I am quite sure with just a few reforms, some of the underground cities used by Martians in the past can be put back into shape - there seems to be too few inhabitants left around there to claim for the vast urban infrastructure that should have been in place back them.
Finally, the voice of reason.
Bio-Dome. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
$5000 is not enough for me to watch Bio-Dome.
-S
That's it? (Score:1)
We're talking about NASA here people... if they are going to be that cheap in compensation for a great idea... they can go phuck themselves.
Oh, I got this! (Score:3)
First, we have to find the alien reactor...
Re:Oh, I got this! (Score:5, Funny)
No, first you have to get your ass to Mars.
Re: (Score:1)
Free your mind... [youtube.com]
Coal-fired power plants, obviously. (Score:2)
Kudzu !!!! (Score:2)
Anyone remember the Thunderbirds 2086 episode KUDZILLA?
Tesla Energy (Score:2)
Give $1000 to charity (won't make any difference to Elon Musk) and give the other $4000 to whoever designs the rest of the city around Tesla's Gigafactory and Powerwall products. Unless Tesla are secretly developing oxygen systems for their already ongoing space concern.
Re: (Score:2)
Inflatable (Score:1)
Just make a huge bouncy castle and drop it from orbit. They're already good at that!
Technically feasible (Score:2)
Here [lego.com], here's a technically feasible Mars idea.
But wait, that's not a city. Not quite. How about this [lego.com]. There. That was about $5000 worth of work. Pay the man.
City? (Score:4, Insightful)
Easy ... (Score:4, Funny)
So, you put 10,000 lawyers and politicians into a hermetically sealed bag ... you launch that bag into space.
Once you've done that, get back to me and I'll tell you the rest.
Re: (Score:1)
We'll call it the B Ark! Just make sure we keep the telephone sanitizers...
My plan -- I just saved NASA $6,666,000,000 (Score:4, Insightful)
"NASA is working on... the rocket expected to launch the [Mars] mission -- the Space Launch System"
My plan:
1. Kill the Senate Launch System and bury it in a landfill
2. Fire everyone who thought it was a good idea
3. Wait around a few years and play Kerbal Space Program
4. Buy a ride on Falcon Heavy R and save a billion bucks per launch
5. Now you can afford to haul more stuff to Mars for a city
Thank you, I'll take the $5000 in cashier's check, Visa or Mastercard.... but definitely NOT American Express.
3D printers! (Score:1)
The answer is 3D printers. They solve all known problems. Just 3D print a massive spaceship, then fly said spaceship to Mars and 3D print yourself a city, then 3D print a breathable atmosphere and magnetic field.
Re: (Score:2)
The answer is 3D printers. They solve all known problems. Just 3D print a massive spaceship, then fly said spaceship to Mars and 3D print yourself a city, then 3D print a breathable atmosphere and magnetic field.
I understand that we'll be able to do that in about twenty years time. In the meantime, we need a short term solution in case an asteroid wipes out all life on Earth tomor
KICKSTARTER!! (Score:2)
I am going to do a Kickstarter with a $100,000 goal to be used to come up with a good idea within a year. The $5000 from NASA will represent a 5% return on the investment, which is very good these days.
Screw Mars! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Use T-Mobile! (Score:3)
Watchmen (Score:4, Funny)
My favorite structure on Mars is the giant clockwork thing in Watchmen. But I guess that doesn't quite meet the breathable air requirement.
Simple (Score:1)
Volunteer the entire Tea Party to go colonize Mars.
Just don't, until you get a functional biosphere. (Score:2)
That's my suggestion. Biosphere 1 and 2 were both failures. We don't know enough to make sustainable closed biospheres work on Earth, much less in orbit or on Mars. When we have something that lasts 10 years, we might be on to something. Until then, practice, practice, practice... Baby steps. How about an L5 or two to start.
Cloud City (Score:2)
Venus (Score:2)
We're scouring the galaxy for Earth-like planets when Earth's twin lives right next door. Sorry, but it's not Mars. We just have to adjust the thermostat a bit...
Re: (Score:2)
Hookers and blackjack.
In fact, forget the blackjack.
Re: (Score:2)
That solved 4 problems fairly well, food, water, power and housing.
Everything else that stems from that is gravy.
Clearly the lack of breathable air is just a tiny detail.