Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Giant Dinosaur Unearthed In Argentina 85

sciencehabit writes Researchers working in Argentina have discovered the most complete skeleton of a titanosaur, a group of gigantic plant-eating dinosaurs that dominated the Southern Hemisphere beginning about 90 million years ago. The new dino, named Dreadnoughtus schrani, was 26 meters long and weighed about 59 metric tons—that is, twice as long as Tyrannosaurus rex and as heavy as a herd of elephants. That puts it on a par with other well-known giants such as Argentinosaurus (but it's four times as large as the perhaps better known Diplodocus). The researchers say that the beast was so big it would have had no fear of predators. And it was about to get bigger: A close examination of the fossils, especially its back and shoulder bones, indicates that the animal was still growing when it died.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Giant Dinosaur Unearthed In Argentina

Comments Filter:
  • by jpellino ( 202698 ) on Thursday September 04, 2014 @08:50PM (#47831409)
    include some scale - you know, a standard metric - a Volkswagen Beetle, football field, Rhode Island?
  • Re:Predators (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Xest ( 935314 ) on Friday September 05, 2014 @06:34AM (#47833147)

    "A better example of pack hunters taking down a larger animal would be wolves taking down a moose or ox."

    Sure but the point he was making I think is that those aren't good examples of animals being quite big enough to survive pack hunters. I think the point is that there are at least some animals that have grown so big that nothing really bothers them much, even in packs- sometimes their smaller young get hunted but that's about it.

    Blue whales are a fine example like elephants, sure orcas have been known to go after the young, but adults? Not a chance - there's just too much animal there for even a pack of them to deal with.

    I think the summary was pointing out simply that the colossal size of this animal meant it was in that category- the set of animals that have managed to grow big enough in their environment that when fully grown even packs aren't going to dick around with.

    I suspect a pack probably could take down these animals, just as a pack of hyenas probably could take down an elephant and a pack of orcas probably could take down a blue whale, but when the risk is so high no such packs are ever going to bother in practice. Why shouldn't this animal fall into the same category? It doesn't seem unreasonable to think that it's sheer size meant it was never hunted when fully grown or near fully grown whether by packs or solo hunters, it was just too fucking big to bother with.

A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth

Working...