Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine Biotech Wireless Networking Science

Wireless Contraception 302

Kittenman writes: The BBC is carrying information on a type of contraception (funded in part by Bill Gates) that takes the form of a microchip, inserted under the skin. The chip releases contraceptive hormones to the body until wirelessly advised not to do so. This device has several interesting applications and issues associated with it. The researchers are already working on making the device secure against unauthorized transmissions. There's also the issue of making it easier for governments to control population levels. The chip will be available from 2018. This correspondent will watch the issues with interest.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wireless Contraception

Comments Filter:
  • Good lord (Score:5, Interesting)

    by GrumpySteen ( 1250194 ) on Tuesday July 08, 2014 @03:23PM (#47409421)

    First the Nest thermostat is said to be enough to make the Stasi blush, then insurance companies are compared to the Panopticon and now a birth control device is supposedly a government plot to control population levels?

    This is supposed to be news for nerds. Not news for delusional paranoiacs.

  • by Tokolosh ( 1256448 ) on Tuesday July 08, 2014 @03:50PM (#47409689)

    I think it would be great to have a phone app that tells me whether the women I have just me in a bar has an operational chip implanted. Then I would not have to trust her saying "I'm safe" or that the condom will malfunction.

  • Re:yes but (Score:4, Interesting)

    by blue9steel ( 2758287 ) on Tuesday July 08, 2014 @04:37PM (#47410111)

    The Hobby Lobby case is/was about individual owners of a company not losing their rights just because they formed a corporation for tax or liability purposes. It treats these individuals just like they were still a sole proprietorship or partnership. Simply put, the decision says that if you form a business, you do not give up any rights regardless of the form of that business.

    Which is why it's a bad ruling. Corporations are a specific grant of public privilege and as such should have different rules than a sole proprietorship or partnership. A corporation is a public institution not a private one and thus has to be held to a higher standard. As a libertarian I completely agree that private institutions should be able to do exactly what the owners of The Hobby Lobby desire, a corporation should not. The correct response would be to revoke their corporate charter and require them to reform as a sole proprietorship or partnership.

  • Re:Good lord (Score:4, Interesting)

    by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportland&yahoo,com> on Tuesday July 08, 2014 @05:08PM (#47410357) Homepage Journal

    There used to be. I remember when nerds where hopeful and did things. now they just whine into there specialty beer.

  • Already? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Snodgrass ( 446409 ) on Tuesday July 08, 2014 @06:10PM (#47410765) Homepage

    The researchers are already working on making the device secure against unauthorized transmissions.

    You're going to trust your body chemistry (moods, behaviors, etc) to a company that considers security as an afterthought?

    Good luck.

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...