When Beliefs and Facts Collide 725
schnell writes A New York Times article discusses a recent Yale study that shows that contrary to popular belief, increased scientific literacy does not correspond to increased belief in accepted scientific findings when it contradicts their religious or political views. The article notes that this is true across the political/religious spectrum and "factual and scientific evidence is often ineffective at reducing misperceptions and can even backfire on issues like weapons of mass destruction, health care reform and vaccines." So what is to be done? The article suggests that "we need to try to break the association between identity and factual beliefs on high-profile issues – for instance, by making clear that you can believe in human-induced climate change and still be a conservative Republican."
It's Okay (Score:0, Funny)
It's okay for Liberals to admit that there is no global warming.
Yep (Score:5, Funny)
Those damb religio-political dogmatists keep blocking publication of my papers on the theory of anturgic phrogneal boropathy.
quelle surprise (Score:5, Funny)
"for instance, by making clear that you can believe in human-induced climate change and still be a conservative Republican."
Unsurprisingly, TFA/NYT chose that polarity as an exemplar instead of its opposite.
Re:What if? (Score:2, Funny)
Are you sure these are scientific doctrine? (Score:4, Funny)
Really?
Re:It's Okay (Score:2, Funny)
No, in this case, we just laugh at you. You're too obnoxious to ignore.
Nobody wins in this game.